Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding missing time_series flag to cc flow field solver call #493

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 16, 2022

Conversation

bayc
Copy link
Collaborator

@bayc bayc commented Aug 31, 2022

Feature or improvement description
This is a small bugfix to add a missing time_series flag to the CC model full flow field solver. It is pointed at the develop branch as the time series functionality is not yet in the main branch.

Related issue, if one exists
None.

Impacted areas of the software
solver.py

Additional supporting information
None.

Test results, if applicable
Can now run example 02 and visualize the CC model, when previously it would error out.

@bayc bayc added bug Something isn't working v3 Label to denote focus on v3 labels Aug 31, 2022
@bayc bayc requested review from paulf81 and rafmudaf August 31, 2022 16:37
@bayc bayc self-assigned this Aug 31, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@paulf81 paulf81 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change makes sense to me! Thanks for catching the bug!

@rafmudaf
Copy link
Collaborator

rafmudaf commented Sep 2, 2022

@bayc Could you add the API documentation for the Grid class time_series argument here: https://github.com/bayc/floris/blob/2bb8a15daa068668d7cf06cf934f458a586ee985/floris/simulation/grid.py#L57?

@rafmudaf rafmudaf merged commit 11eece0 into NREL:develop Sep 16, 2022
@rafmudaf rafmudaf mentioned this pull request Sep 16, 2022
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working v3 Label to denote focus on v3
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants