Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding the TurbOPark wake velocity deficit model #396

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 31, 2022

Conversation

bayc
Copy link
Collaborator

@bayc bayc commented Mar 17, 2022

Feature or improvement description
This pull request add the TurbOPark wake velocity deficit model, respective solver, and tests to the FLORIS package. For more details on the TurbOPark model, see: https://github.com/OrstedRD/TurbOPark.

Related issue, if one exists
Closes #297

Impacted areas of the software
Most of the simulation directory and parts of FlorisInterface.

Additional supporting information
This is an initial implementation of the TurbOPark model. Due to the nature of the model, it does not currently support plotting of the wakes (flow field points are assumed to be at turbine locations). Additionally, the current implementation does not support wake steering. Either plotting or setting of yaw angles will cause an error to be issued when using this model. Also, the model is currently only meant to be used with the linear (FLS) wake combination method.

@bayc bayc added enhancement An improvement of an existing feature v3 Label to denote focus on v3 labels Mar 17, 2022
@bayc bayc added this to the v3.1.0 milestone Mar 17, 2022
@bayc bayc self-assigned this Mar 17, 2022
@bayc bayc linked an issue Mar 17, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
# Conflicts:
#	floris/simulation/solver.py
@rafmudaf
Copy link
Collaborator

@bayc we also need to update the TurbOPark solver to use the _sorted variables where necessary

rafmudaf and others added 2 commits March 31, 2022 15:40
* Use sorted flow field velocities

* getting additional _sorted parameters

Co-authored-by: bayc <christopher.j.bay@gmail.com>
@bayc bayc merged commit ba546fa into NREL:develop Mar 31, 2022
@bayc bayc deleted the feature/add_turbopark branch March 31, 2022 22:43
@rafmudaf rafmudaf mentioned this pull request Mar 31, 2022
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement An improvement of an existing feature v3 Label to denote focus on v3
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add TurbOPark model
3 participants