Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add sysroot to installation instruction #1400

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 3, 2021
Merged

Add sysroot to installation instruction #1400

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 3, 2021

Conversation

Zaharid
Copy link
Contributor

@Zaharid Zaharid commented Sep 2, 2021

This has been a built dependency since #1280 and we can't seem to get rid of it. People are finding (see #1290) that following the current instructions gives errors so we should add it until we can remove it.

Closes #1290.

This has been a built dependency since #1280 and we can't seem to get rid of it. People are finding (see #1290) that following the current instructions gives errors so we should add it until we can remove it.
@Zaharid
Copy link
Contributor Author

Zaharid commented Sep 2, 2021

I think we can close #1290 after merging this, as the behaviour would be documented. But the real fix is #1284 (also because relying on inifinite free CI time might not be so sustainable).

Copy link
Member

@RoyStegeman RoyStegeman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The problem is not that sysroot is not installed at all, rather that after installing the nnpdf dependencies the default version is 2.12. See also,

# See https://github.com/NNPDF/nnpdf/pull/1280
- sysroot_linux-64==2.17 # [linux]
.

doc/sphinx/source/get-started/installation.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Roy Stegeman <roystegeman@live.nl>
Copy link
Member

@scarlehoff scarlehoff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But the real fix is #1284 (also because relying on inifinite free CI time might not be so sustainable).

I agree.

Edit: also, maintaining a requeriments.txt file for an easy conda-less installation could be good as well, even as an unsupported feature.

@Zaharid Zaharid merged commit e263f6f into master Sep 3, 2021
@Zaharid Zaharid deleted the Zaharid-patch-1 branch September 3, 2021 09:51
@Zaharid Zaharid added the documentation Issues and PRs related to documentation label Oct 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Issues and PRs related to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

compilation using conda development environment seems to be broken
3 participants