chore: Add legacy path #175
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@sime can you add a PR description to explain this change? |
|
@mikesposito Description is updated. Related comment MetaMask/metamask-extension#19443 (comment) |
|
@Gudahtt @mikesposito What are the chances of a point release for this? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related PR MetaMask/metamask-extension#19443
Ledger users are migrating to Trezor, directly inputting their recovery phrases into the HWW. OG Ethereum users are unable to access their assets on Trezor to due the 'legacy' derivation path not available when configuring Trezor.
The Ledger integration offers the same legacy derivation path: https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/blob/f03f2d3f79ce0c54bbce033cd83cdf9c4f26b363/ui/pages/create-account/connect-hardware/index.js#LL41C1-L41C1
https://www.reddit.com/r/TREZOR/comments/13wy3xz/comment/jmlwqyw/?context=3