Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix current/active server deletability validation #17391

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 30, 2018

Conversation

jrafanie
Copy link
Member

@jrafanie jrafanie commented May 7, 2018

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575077

Note, the UI will need to check server.errors after attempting to
destroy the record to see any errors.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575077

Note, the UI will need to check server.errors after attempting to
destroy the record to see any errors.
@jrafanie jrafanie force-pushed the fix_server_deleteable_validation branch from 84ebb58 to 7040201 Compare May 7, 2018 20:36
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented May 7, 2018

Checked commit jrafanie@7040201 with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.52.1, haml-lint 0.20.0, and yamllint 1.10.0
2 files checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. ⭐

Copy link
Member

@kbrock kbrock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 good use of validations (the way they are meant to be used)

@jrafanie
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @kbrock.

This is ready to go, once merged, @dclarizio @h-kataria, this PR will allow the UI to check the validations on deletions as described in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575077#c4

@carbonin carbonin self-assigned this May 30, 2018
@carbonin carbonin merged commit f827149 into ManageIQ:master May 30, 2018
@carbonin carbonin added this to the Sprint 87 Ending Jun 4, 2018 milestone May 30, 2018
@jrafanie jrafanie deleted the fix_server_deleteable_validation branch May 31, 2018 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants