Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add runners needed for Prometheus alert collection #15864

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 23, 2017

Conversation

moolitayer
Copy link

Add new Prometheus workers so they can be started.

Depends on:
ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-kubernetes#40
ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-openshift#22

@moolitayer
Copy link
Author

@miq-bot add_label wip

@miq-bot miq-bot added the wip label Aug 21, 2017
@moolitayer moolitayer changed the title [WIP] New providers [WIP] Add runners needed for Prometheus alert collection Aug 21, 2017
@moolitayer moolitayer changed the title [WIP] Add runners needed for Prometheus alert collection Add runners needed for Prometheus alert collection Aug 23, 2017
@miq-bot miq-bot removed the wip label Aug 23, 2017
@blomquisg
Copy link
Member

blomquisg commented Sep 18, 2017

Waiting on worker PRs to be merged. I'll mark this wip until those are merged.

Please un-wip when those are merged. Then it will show back up on my list.

@blomquisg blomquisg added the wip label Sep 18, 2017
@@ -29,13 +29,15 @@
"ManageIQ::Providers::Kubernetes::ContainerManager::EventCatcher" => %i(manageiq_default),
"ManageIQ::Providers::Kubernetes::ContainerManager::MetricsCollectorWorker" => %i(manageiq_default),
"ManageIQ::Providers::Kubernetes::ContainerManager::RefreshWorker" => %i(manageiq_default),
"ManageIQ::Providers::Kubernetes::MonitoringManager::EventCatcher" => %i(kubernetes openshift),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jrafanie what's the impact of using kubernetes openshift here for the mapping? I see everything else uses manageiq_default.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@blomquisg Currently, we have tight coupling to the manageiq-api and vmware provider gems, see here, so you'll get NameError/LoadError when core code tries to load Api and vmware. For now, we need to use manageiq_default here to be safe.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, updated

@moolitayer
Copy link
Author

@blomquisg @gtanzillo could you please review? The dependent code was merged

@moolitayer
Copy link
Author

@miq-bot remove_label wip

@miq-bot miq-bot removed the wip label Oct 16, 2017
@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Oct 16, 2017

Checked commits moolitayer/manageiq@0a54bf0~...11ebdfe with ruby 2.3.3, rubocop 0.47.1, and haml-lint 0.20.0
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks fine. 🏆

Copy link
Member

@gtanzillo gtanzillo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍 @blomquisg are you good with this?

@moolitayer
Copy link
Author

ping @blomquisg

@chessbyte
Copy link
Member

cc @agrare and @Fryguy

@blomquisg blomquisg merged commit 2ec76f1 into ManageIQ:master Oct 23, 2017
@blomquisg blomquisg added this to the Sprint 72 Ending Oct 30, 2017 milestone Oct 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants