Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EUWE] add missing ActiveSupport::Concern to middle module #12585

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2016

Conversation

durandom
Copy link
Member

backporting this #11899 resulted in 🔴 CI, because this missing extend ActiveSupport::Concern in ManageIQ::Providers::Redhat::InfraManager::Vm::Operations was introduced in another PR that should not be backported.

@durandom
Copy link
Member Author

cc @oourfali @borod108

@durandom
Copy link
Member Author

durandom commented Nov 11, 2016

cc @Fryguy @chrisarcand another reason, why it would be good to make the SupportsFeatureMixin more robust. With the implementation in #11322 this would not have happened

@miq-bot
Copy link
Member

miq-bot commented Nov 11, 2016

Checked commit durandom@33bb16f with ruby 2.2.5, rubocop 0.37.2, and haml-lint 0.16.1
1 file checked, 0 offenses detected
Everything looks good. 🍪

@chessbyte
Copy link
Member

Travis failure is the result of UI spec needing to be expanded in #11899. Merging to remove major spec failures.

@chessbyte chessbyte merged commit 0a75070 into ManageIQ:euwe Nov 11, 2016
@chessbyte chessbyte added this to the Sprint 49 Ending Nov 14, 2016 milestone Nov 11, 2016
@chrisarcand
Copy link
Member

another reason, why it would be good to make the SupportsFeatureMixin more robust.

TBH I don't see that as a valid reason; requiring that these modules use AR::Concern is a perfectly fine solution to me (this coming from the guy that really dislikes Concerns). If anything it would make things more consistent.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants