Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

convert from Taylor model to SparsePolynomialZonotope #3440

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

schillic
Copy link
Member

@schillic schillic commented Feb 24, 2024

The unit test is not perfect because it checks for equality, not equivalence; but we do not have an equivalence check for polynomial zonotopes. So I added another integration test that checks equivalence of the overapproximations, which in this case holds (I doubt it holds in general, though, so this is also not really a good test).
With #3446, the zonotope overapproximations are indeed identical (without #3446, they are still equivalent, but with lots of redundant generators).

@schillic schillic force-pushed the schillic/convert branch 2 times, most recently from 475099e to 8110ee5 Compare February 25, 2024 22:29
@schillic schillic marked this pull request as ready for review February 26, 2024 16:48
@schillic schillic force-pushed the schillic/convert branch 2 times, most recently from f732a30 to d8f9ee3 Compare February 26, 2024 19:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant