Add number parameter to OnWhatsAppDto constructor

[judsonjuniorr]

When requesting if the Whatsapp number is valid, if the number sent contains the 9 digit from Brazil, and the result comes without that digit, there's no way to identify the number sent inside the response array.

With this change the response DTO will become like this:

With that when the API returns the list of valid numbers I can identify that exact number I sent

[leandrosroc]

With the exact number returned of what was sent, will it be used for comparison or for later sending? because if the jid returned without the ninth digit, then it would later be sent to the person who is in the jid, being registered on WhatsApp

[leandrosroc]

Jid Whatsapp is the most correct number to use when sending

[judsonjuniorr]

@leandrosroc will be used just for comparison.

Here an example:

Request:

{
  "numbers": [
    "5534998313925",
    "553498313925"
  ]
}

Response:

[
    {
        "jid": "553498313925@s.whatsapp.net",
        "exists": true,
        "number": "5534998313925"
    },
    {
        "jid": "553498313925@s.whatsapp.net",
        "exists": true,
        "number": "553498313925"
    }
]

And then I can compare to save the jid in the database for that number:

[
    "5534998313925",
    "553498313925"
].map(number => {
    const jidValidation = result.find(r => r.number === number)
    const jidExists = jidValidation?.exists ?? false
    const jid = jidValidation?.jid
})

And with this I can store the jid on the database for that specific number.

After storing the jid for that number I can check the validation from my database instead of requesting the validation before sending any message

[leandrosroc]

I understood

[judsonjuniorr]

I tried but It's not the exact value, check this example:

Request:

{
  "numbers": [
    "5534998313925",
  ]
}

Response:

[
    {
        "jid": "553498313925@s.whatsapp.net",
        "exists": true,
    }
]

You can see I sent 5534998313925 but the jid number returned is 553498313925 without the 9 digit

[leandrosroc]

I agree, makes sense for the proposed objective