drmP.h removed in linux 5.5 #185

sjau · 2020-02-01T06:50:39Z

Initially please make sure the problem hasn't been already addressed:

Are you using the latest driver?
(https://www.displaylink.com/downloads/ubuntu)
Are you using the latest EVDI version?
(https://github.com/DisplayLink/evdi/releases)
If you are using a DisplayLink device, have you checked 'troubleshooting'
on DisplayLink's website?
(https://support.displaylink.com/knowledgebase/topics/103927-troubleshooting-ubuntu)
Is this issue related to evdi/kernel?
(if it is rather connected to DisplayLinkManager please take a look at support
https://support.displaylink.com or forum https://www.displaylink.org/forum/)

In Linux 5.5 the drmP.h was removed which causes breakage as

module/evdi_drv.c
module/evdi_drv.h

want to include that. Simply commenting out the drmP.h file in aforementions files breaks the compilation.

  AR      /build/source/module/built-in.a
   35 | struct drm_ioctl_desc evdi_painter_ioctls[] = {
   36 |  DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV(EVDI_CONNECT, evdi_painter_connect_ioctl,
      |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:54:10: error: 'drm_poll' undeclared here (not in a function)
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:88:39: error: 'DRIVER_GEM' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'DRIVER_DESC'?
      |   ^~~~~~
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:102:3: error: 'struct drm_driver' has no member named 'dumb_create'
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  104 |  .dumb_destroy = drm_gem_dumb_destroy,
  106 |  .ioctls = evdi_painter_ioctls,
  111 |  .prime_fd_to_handle = drm_gem_prime_fd_to_handle,
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:124:3: error: 'struct drm_driver' has no member named 'name'
  126 |  .date = DRIVER_DATE,
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.h:32:23: note: (near initialization for 'driver')
   32 | #define DRIVER_DATE   "20191204"
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:16:
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.h:34:27: note: (near initialization for 'driver')
   34 | #define DRIVER_MAJOR      1
  127 |  .major = DRIVER_MAJOR,
      |           ^~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:16:
   35 | #define DRIVER_MINOR      6
  128 |  .minor = DRIVER_MINOR,
      |           ^~~~~~~~~~~~
   35 | #define DRIVER_MINOR      6
      |                           ^
  129 |  .patchlevel = DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL,
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.h:36:27: error: excess elements in struct initializer [-Werror]
   36 | #define DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL 4
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.h:36:27: note: (near initialization for 'driver')
   36 | #define DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL 4
      |                           ^
  129 |  .patchlevel = DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL,
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c: In function 'evdi_add_device':
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:142:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'DMA_BIT_MASK'; did you mean 'MMF_INIT_MASK'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  142 |   .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
      |               MMF_INIT_MASK
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:147:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'dma_set_mask'; did you mean 'xa_set_mark'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  147 |  if (dma_set_mask(&evdi_context.devices[evdi_context.dev_count]->dev,
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~

      |      xa_set_mark

/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c: In function 'evdi_platform_probe':
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:187:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_dev_alloc'; did you mean 'pmd_alloc'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  187 |  dev = drm_dev_alloc(&driver, &pdev->dev);
      |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |        pmd_alloc
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:187:6: error: assignment to 'struct drm_device *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
  187 |  dev = drm_dev_alloc(&driver, &pdev->dev);
      |      ^
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:195:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_dev_register'; did you mean 'driver_register'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  195 |  ret = drm_dev_register(dev, 0);
      |        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |        driver_register
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:203:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_dev_put'; did you mean 'drm_dev_dbg'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  203 |  drm_dev_put(dev);
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~~
      |  drm_dev_dbg
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c: In function 'evdi_platform_remove':
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:226:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_dev_unplug'; did you mean 'drm_dev_dbg'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  226 |  drm_dev_unplug(drm_dev);
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |  drm_dev_dbg
In file included from /build/source/module/evdi_drv.h:28,
                 from /build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:16:
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c: In function 'evdi_init':
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:343:10: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct drm_driver'
  343 |   (driver.driver_features & DRIVER_ATOMIC) ? "yes" : "no");
      |          ^
/build/source/module/evdi_debug.h:24:44: note: in definition of macro 'EVDI_PRINTK'
   24 |   printk(KERN_LEVEL "evdi: " FORMAT_STR, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
      |                                            ^~~~~~~~~~~
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:342:2: note: in expansion of macro 'EVDI_INFO'
  342 |  EVDI_INFO("Atomic driver:%s",
      |  ^~~~~~~~~
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c: At top level:
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:83:26: error: storage size of 'driver' isn't known
   83 | static struct drm_driver driver = {
      |                          ^~~~~~
/build/source/module/evdi_drv.c:83:26: error: storage size of 'driver' isn't known
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

The nVidia drivers have the same issue, see discussion:

https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/1068332/linux/nvidia-driver-does-not-build-on-linux-v5-5-release-candidate-kernel/

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

zacharyburkett · 2020-02-03T21:52:08Z

I just updated to 5.5.1 and am also experiencing this issue. I've tried to patch with by replacing headers.

First, I replaced <drm/drmP.h> with the following:
#include <drm/drm_file.h>
#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
#include <drm/drm_device.h>

However, it seems like <linux/reservation.h> is missing too.

I'm going to continue trying to patch this, as I need DisplayLink for work. However, I'd really appreciate some help.

zacharyburkett · 2020-02-04T00:09:19Z

The amount of changes necessary is making my head spin.

Maintainers, any assistance?

zacharyburkett · 2020-02-04T01:51:52Z

Seems there is a PR #182

displaylink-dkurek · 2020-02-04T07:05:56Z

Sorry guys, we are falling a bit behind the kernel releases.
I guess the best approach would be to make it 'kernel-by-kernel'
(recently there were quite a few changes in DRM subsystem).
#172 already has patches for 5.4, hopefully we will integrate them
shortly.

EDIT: accidentally wrote 4.4 instead of 5.4.

sjau · 2020-02-04T07:23:39Z

I assume you meant to write 5.4.

displaylink-dkurek · 2020-02-04T10:41:01Z

Yes, 5.4. Edited :). Thanks.

abucodonosor · 2020-02-04T16:11:54Z

Sorry guys, we are falling a bit behind the kernel releases.
I guess the best approach would be to make it 'kernel-by-kernel'
(recently there were quite a few changes in DRM subsystem).
#172 already has patches for 5.4, hopefully we will integrate them
shortly.

EDIT: accidentally wrote 4.4 instead of 5.4.

I've made a test patch for 5.5, is not correct because I think each file should have correct includes also a lot #ifdef's needed but that is something you guys need to decide.
Also, the code fix needs #ifdef's. It works on top of the other patch for 5.4.

https://gitweb.frugalware.org/frugalware-current/raw/master/source/lib-extra/evdi/kernel-5.5-test.patch

Feel free to take this one too or use parts as you wish.

Zetabite · 2020-02-07T03:21:12Z

having similar issues on arch on kernel 5.5.2, using the patch got me rid of the error drmP not existing, but now i have run into another and with that idk what i should do about it.

abucodonosor · 2020-02-07T04:58:34Z

@Zetabite

what issue do you have now?

kvaps · 2020-02-07T12:04:05Z

@abucodonosor thanks, but patch isn't working for me too:

DKMS make.log for evdi-1.6.4 for kernel 5.5.2-arch1-1 (x86_64)
Fri Feb  7 13:02:52 CET 2020
make KBUILD_VERBOSE=1 SUBDIRS=/var/lib/dkms/evdi/1.6.4/build SRCROOT=/var/lib/dkms/evdi/1.6.4/build CONFIG_MODULE_SIG= -C /lib/modules/5.5.2-arch1-1/build modules
make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/lib/modules/5.5.2-arch1-1/build'
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=arch/x86/entry/syscalls all
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=scripts/basic
set -e; mkdir -p include/config/; { echo "5.5.2-arch1$(sh ./scripts/setlocalversion .)"; } > include/config/kernel.release.tmp; if [ -r include/config/kernel.release ] && cmp -s include/config/kernel.release include/config/kernel.release.tmp; then rm -f include/config/kernel.release.tmp; else : '  UPD     include/config/kernel.release'; mv -f include/config/kernel.release.tmp include/config/kernel.release; fi
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.asm-generic obj=arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm \
generic=include/uapi/asm-generic
set -e; mkdir -p include/generated/uapi/linux/; {       echo \#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 328962; echo '#define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))'; } > include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h.tmp; if [ -r include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h ] && cmp -s include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h.tmp; then rm -f include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h.tmp; else : '  UPD     include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h'; mv -f include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h.tmp include/generated/uapi/linux/version.h; fi
mkdir -p ./tools
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin obj=init
make LDFLAGS= MAKEFLAGS=" --jobserver-auth=3,4" O=/usr/lib/modules/5.5.2-arch1-1/build subdir=tools -C ./tools/ objtool
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin obj=usr
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin obj=arch/x86
rm -f include/linux/version.h
make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'objtool'.
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin obj=kernel
scripts/Makefile.build:42: arch/x86/entry/syscalls/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'arch/x86/entry/syscalls/Makefile'.  Stop.
make[1]: *** [arch/x86/Makefile:238: archheaders] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
rm -f .tmp_quiet_recordmcount
scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:26: init/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'init/Makefile'.  Stop.
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1297: _modbuiltin_init] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:26: usr/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'usr/Makefile'.  Stop.
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1297: _modbuiltin_usr] Error 2
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin obj=kernel/bpf
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin obj=kernel/cgroup
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin obj=kernel/dma
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin obj=kernel/events
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin obj=kernel/irq
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin obj=kernel/livepatch
scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:26: kernel/bpf/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'kernel/bpf/Makefile'.  Stop.
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:55: kernel/bpf] Error 2
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:26: kernel/cgroup/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'kernel/cgroup/Makefile'.  Stop.
scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:26: kernel/dma/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'kernel/dma/Makefile'.  Stop.
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:55: kernel/cgroup] Error 2
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:55: kernel/dma] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:26: kernel/irq/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'kernel/irq/Makefile'.  Stop.
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:55: kernel/irq] Error 2
scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:26: kernel/livepatch/Makefile: No such file or directory
scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:26: kernel/events/Makefile: No such file or directory
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'kernel/livepatch/Makefile'.  Stop.
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'kernel/events/Makefile'.  Stop.
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:55: kernel/events] Error 2
make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modbuiltin:55: kernel/livepatch] Error 2
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1297: _modbuiltin_kernel] Error 2
scripts/Kbuild.include:120: *** Recursive variable 'CC_OPTION_CFLAGS' references itself (eventually).  Stop.
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1297: _modbuiltin_arch/x86] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/lib/modules/5.5.2-arch1-1/build'
make: *** [Makefile:22: all] Error 2

Zetabite · 2020-02-07T12:36:02Z

same as @kvaps

abucodonosor · 2020-02-07T13:19:08Z

@kvaps @Zetabite

looks like you are using DKMS?, If so you are missing one fix I think.

Apply patch from Fails to build on kernel 5.4 #172 (comment)
Use DKMS fix from Fails to build on kernel 5.4 #172 (comment)
Apply patch from drmP.h removed in linux 5.5 #185 (comment)

abucodonosor · 2020-02-07T13:34:11Z

@Zetabite

Uh yeah, you can ignore that one. But let me do a quick all in one re-diff for you guys

Zetabite · 2020-02-07T13:37:49Z

@abucodonosor that made it work, thank you very much

abucodonosor · 2020-02-07T13:39:39Z

There a re-diff with all 3 fixes against current git code, should work on released code too.

https://crazy.dev.frugalware.org/all-in-one-kernel-5.4-and-5.5-test.patch

Zetabite · 2020-02-07T13:42:38Z

ill test this one

kvaps · 2020-02-07T13:45:39Z

Apply patch from #172 (comment)

Use DKMS fix from #172 (comment)

Apply patch from #185 (comment)

failed
make.log

kvaps · 2020-02-07T13:47:51Z

https://crazy.dev.frugalware.org/all-in-one-kernel-5.4-and-5.5-test.patch

this patch built succesful

Zetabite · 2020-02-07T13:51:15Z

patch results in a successful build

sjau · 2020-02-07T13:55:00Z

Awesome. I'll test it tonight as well.

abucodonosor · 2020-02-07T13:55:32Z

@kvaps @Zetabite

Ok. Happy testing then :-).

kvaps · 2020-02-07T14:01:03Z

With patch from #185 (comment) evdi is working fine for me

# uname -r
5.5.2-arch1-1

@abucodonosor thanks a lot!

resingm · 2020-02-08T16:55:55Z

Do you mind pushing it? Would be great to see it on AUR soon.

sjau · 2020-02-09T06:35:09Z

I tried the all-in-one patch but wasn't successful:

/build/source/module/evdi_connector.c: In function 'evdi_best_encoder':
/build/source/module/evdi_connector.c:113:60: error: macro "drm_connector_for_each_possible_encoder" requires 3 arguments, but only 2 given
  113 |  drm_connector_for_each_possible_encoder(connector, encoder)
      |                                                            ^
In file included from /build/source/module/evdi_connector.c:14:
/nix/store/l4ffh6hzgd156qmp1b93a3kfw1k48w82-linux-5.4.14-dev/lib/modules/5.4.14/source/include/drm/drm_connector.h:1613: note: macro "drm_connector_for_each_possible_encoder" defined here
 1613 | #define drm_connector_for_each_possible_encoder(connector, encoder, __i) \
      |
'/nix/store/bmwcf9dlnzzjbma5ckb7p581lny1h3kb-busybox-1.31.1/bin/route' -> '/nix/store/zzcvb50qh1fw807ls282yh958q9ar5hx-extra-utils/bin/route'
/build/source/module/evdi_connector.c:113:2: error: 'drm_connector_for_each_possible_encoder' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'drm_connector_has_possible_encoder'?
  113 |  drm_connector_for_each_possible_encoder(connector, encoder)
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      |  drm_connector_has_possible_encoder
/build/source/module/evdi_connector.c:113:2: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
/build/source/module/evdi_connector.c:113:41: error: expected ';' before 'return'
  113 |  drm_connector_for_each_possible_encoder(connector, encoder)
      |                                         ^
      |                                         ;
  114 |                return encoder;
      |                ~~~~~~
/build/source/module/evdi_connector.c:111:22: error: unused variable 'encoder' [-Werror=unused-variable]
  111 |  struct drm_encoder *encoder;
      |                      ^~~~~~~
/build/source/module/evdi_connector.c:108:68: error: unused parameter 'connector' [-Werror=unused-parameter]
  108 | static struct drm_encoder *evdi_best_encoder(struct drm_connector *connector)
      |                                              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~
'/nix/store/bmwcf9dlnzzjbma5ckb7p581lny1h3kb-busybox-1.31.1/bin/rpm' -> '/nix/store/zzcvb50qh1fw807ls282yh958q9ar5hx-extra-utils/bin/rpm'
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[4]: *** [/nix/store/l4ffh6hzgd156qmp1b93a3kfw1k48w82-linux-5.4.14-dev/lib/modules/5.4.14/source/scripts/Makefile.build:266: /build/source/module/evdi_connector.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [/nix/store/l4ffh6hzgd156qmp1b93a3kfw1k48w82-linux-5.4.14-dev/lib/modules/5.4.14/source/Makefile:1652: /build/source/module] Error 2
make[2]: *** [/nix/store/l4ffh6hzgd156qmp1b93a3kfw1k48w82-linux-5.4.14-dev/lib/modules/5.4.14/source/Makefile:179: sub-make] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory '/nix/store/l4ffh6hzgd156qmp1b93a3kfw1k48w82-linux-5.4.14-dev/lib/modules/5.4.14/build'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:67: module] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/build/source/module'
make: *** [Makefile:8: all] Error 2

abucodonosor · 2020-02-09T13:21:36Z

@sjau

Actually, the patch is missing #ifdef's for kernel 5.4 so it only compiles with a kernel 5.5.x.

selvagg · 2020-02-09T23:43:38Z

Can we please have this fix pushed to AUR?

sjau · 2020-02-11T13:34:30Z

@sjau
Actually, the patch is missing #ifdef's for kernel 5.4 so it only compiles with a kernel 5.5.x.

well, it was indicated as:

5.4 and 5.5 "all-in-one-kernel-5.4-and-5.5-test.patch"

displaylink-dkurek · 2020-02-14T05:48:02Z

OK, so update for kernel 5.4, 5.5 and changes for DKMS build landed on devel. Hopefully I haven't missed anything :)

ViggoGaming · 2020-02-21T10:25:06Z

When is this in the aur?

abucodonosor · 2020-02-21T17:20:24Z

@ViggoGaming

Why do you think it is appropriate to ask here about Distribution specific packaging things in here?

Please use the appropriate Distribution mechanisms for that, in this case,
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/evdi/

Thx

devnix · 2020-02-24T09:47:19Z

Neither the patch on latest tag or the branch devel will work for me, getting the same drmP.h errors when running sudo dkms install evdi/5.2.14

sjau · 2020-02-24T10:50:19Z

Works for me with latest devel and kernel 5.5

devnix · 2020-02-24T12:56:36Z

@sjau Which patch of 5.5? I'm trying to compile it on 5.5.5

sjau · 2020-02-24T13:09:54Z

Linux subi 5.5.5 #1-NixOS SMP Wed Feb 19 18:54:14 UTC 2020 x86_64 GNU/Linux

devnix · 2020-02-24T16:49:22Z

Wow, it's very odd. If it helps, I'm using Ubuntu. I guess I'll try later with a VM

a-anjos · 2020-04-27T10:34:44Z

What I did on Debian Bullseye Kernel 5.5, X1C6, docking Thinkpad 40AF:

1 - Download https://www.displaylink.com/downloads/file?id=1369, and:

./displaylink-driver-5.2.14.run --keep --noexec
cd displaylink-driver-5.2.14/

2 - Download https://github.com/DisplayLink/evdi/archive/devel.zip and extract the content.
3 - Replace the contents of displaylink-driver-5.2.14/evdi-5.2.14-src.tar.gz with the contents of evdi-devel/module (don't change the file name).
4 - Created soft link (modify according to your kernel version):

cd /lib/modules/5.5.0-2-amd64/ 
sudo ln -s Makefile Kconfig

5 - Execute: sudo ./displaylink-installer.sh install
6 - Reboot the system

I was using Ubuntu before and had a very large lag in the video (it looked like the keyboard was too slow, but it was just the video not being updated). On Debian, it's perfect.
The PROBLEM is that I need to have the laptop's lid open (i.e. must have both screens on), and sleep doesn't work. Therefore, for this to be usable, I always need to fully shutdown the laptop and, when I turn it on, I need to leave the lid open.
I hope this helps until we have a proper DisplayLink driver for Linux.

sjau changed the title ~~drmP.h remove in linux 5.5~~ drmP.h removed in linux 5.5 Feb 1, 2020

displaylink-dkurek closed this as completed Feb 14, 2020

sjau mentioned this issue Feb 25, 2020

EVDI: 2019-01-16 -> 2019-02-25 NixOS/nixpkgs#81012

Merged

10 tasks

msandres13 mentioned this issue Apr 26, 2020

Fedora 31 fails to compile evdi #198

Closed

Zetabite mentioned this issue Apr 28, 2020

evdi doesnt compile on arch kernel 5.6.7 #199

Closed

geerlingguy mentioned this issue Jan 29, 2021

Test GPU (ASRock Rack M2_VGA, based on SM750) geerlingguy/raspberry-pi-pcie-devices#62

Closed

drmP.h removed in linux 5.5 #185

drmP.h removed in linux 5.5 #185

Comments

sjau commented Feb 1, 2020

zacharyburkett commented Feb 3, 2020

zacharyburkett commented Feb 4, 2020

zacharyburkett commented Feb 4, 2020

displaylink-dkurek commented Feb 4, 2020 • edited Loading

sjau commented Feb 4, 2020

displaylink-dkurek commented Feb 4, 2020

abucodonosor commented Feb 4, 2020

Zetabite commented Feb 7, 2020

abucodonosor commented Feb 7, 2020

kvaps commented Feb 7, 2020

Zetabite commented Feb 7, 2020

abucodonosor commented Feb 7, 2020

abucodonosor commented Feb 7, 2020

Zetabite commented Feb 7, 2020

abucodonosor commented Feb 7, 2020

Zetabite commented Feb 7, 2020

kvaps commented Feb 7, 2020

kvaps commented Feb 7, 2020

Zetabite commented Feb 7, 2020

sjau commented Feb 7, 2020

abucodonosor commented Feb 7, 2020

kvaps commented Feb 7, 2020 • edited Loading

resingm commented Feb 8, 2020

sjau commented Feb 9, 2020

abucodonosor commented Feb 9, 2020

selvagg commented Feb 9, 2020

sjau commented Feb 11, 2020

displaylink-dkurek commented Feb 14, 2020

ViggoGaming commented Feb 21, 2020

abucodonosor commented Feb 21, 2020

devnix commented Feb 24, 2020

sjau commented Feb 24, 2020

devnix commented Feb 24, 2020

sjau commented Feb 24, 2020

devnix commented Feb 24, 2020

a-anjos commented Apr 27, 2020 • edited Loading

displaylink-dkurek commented Feb 4, 2020 •

edited

Loading

kvaps commented Feb 7, 2020 •

edited

Loading

a-anjos commented Apr 27, 2020 •

edited

Loading