fix(profiling): code provenance using libdatadog exporter [backport 2.14]

[github-actions]

Backport 4363516 from #10796 to 2.14.

Checklist

• PR author has checked that all the criteria below are met
• The PR description includes an overview of the change
• The PR description articulates the motivation for the change
• The change includes tests OR the PR description describes a testing strategy
• The PR description notes risks associated with the change, if any
• Newly-added code is easy to change
• The change follows the library release note guidelines
• The change includes or references documentation updates if necessary
• Backport labels are set (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

• Reviewer has checked that all the criteria below are met
• Title is accurate
• All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal
• Avoids breaking API changes
• Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks
• Newly-added code is easy to change
• Release note makes sense to a user of the library
• If necessary, author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment
• Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the release branch maintenance policy

[github-actions]

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/include/code_provenance.hpp  @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/include/code_provenance_interface.hpp  @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/src/code_provenance.cpp   @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/src/code_provenance_interface.cpp  @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/test/code_provenance.cpp  @DataDog/profiling-python
releasenotes/notes/profiling-libdd-code-provenance-37f9e3451b0c532c.yaml  @DataDog/apm-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/CMakeLists.txt            @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/include/libdatadog_helpers.hpp  @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/src/ddup_interface.cpp    @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/src/sample.cpp            @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/src/uploader.cpp          @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/test/CMakeLists.txt       @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/dd_wrapper/test/test_utils.hpp       @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/ddup/_ddup.pyi                       @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/internal/datadog/profiling/ddup/_ddup.pyx                       @DataDog/profiling-python
ddtrace/profiling/profiler.py                                           @DataDog/profiling-python

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2024-10-02 00:24:11

Comparing candidate commit 540694a in PR branch backport-10796-to-2.14 with baseline commit a213e8d in branch 2.14.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 344 metrics, 48 unstable metrics.