Fix bitbucket improve issue #240

sarbjitsinghgrewal · 2023-08-24T12:26:28Z

I've worked on addressing the following Bitbucket-related issues:

Inline Review:
The problem with the lack of support for create_inline_comment was causing the failure of this feature. To remedy this, I've introduced a new function, create_inline_comment(), which facilitates the creation of inline comments. Moreover, I've created another function called publish_bitbucket_inline_comments() specifically for enabling support for Bitbucket inline comments. With these additions in place, the inline review functionality has been successfully restored and is now fully operational.

Auto-Description:
I dedicated my efforts to resolving the non-functional "describe" functionality. Upon investigation, I discovered a bug wherein using the "describe" command on GitHub led to the insertion of erroneous data such as dictionaries or lists. I've taken the initiative to fix this bug, ensuring that the "describe" command functions as intended. Now, this issue has been effectively rectified, and the functionality operates seamlessly.

Update CHANGELOG.md:
An impediment within the code prevented Bitbucket from incorporating comments for updating the Changelog. I've taken the necessary steps to remove this limiting condition. Additionally, I've implemented a new function that allows for the addition of comments within the Bitbucket file. Thanks to these adjustments, the obstacle has been overcome, and the ability to add comments for updating the Changelog on Bitbucket is now fully functional.

I've thoroughly tested these changes to ensure their effectiveness. Furthermore, I've employed Docker commands to execute the project, confirming that all modifications are functioning optimally. This includes the successful addition of comments to pull requests.

These comprehensive improvements are expected to significantly enhance the project's functionality. I invite you to review the changes and share your feedback. Should any further adjustments be required, please don't hesitate to communicate them to me. Your input is invaluable as we strive for project excellence.

…_bitbucket_improve_issue

mrT23 · 2023-08-28T06:20:39Z

Preparing review...

…_bitbucket_improve_issue

sb0210 · 2023-08-30T11:41:45Z

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

CodiumAI-Agent · 2023-08-30T11:42:40Z

PR Analysis

🎯 Main theme: This PR focuses on improving Bitbucket support in the PR-Agent project. It introduces new functionalities and fixes existing issues related to inline comments, auto-description, and updating the CHANGELOG.md file.
📝 PR summary: The PR introduces new functions to create and publish inline comments for Bitbucket. It also fixes a bug in the auto-description functionality and enables Bitbucket to incorporate comments for updating the Changelog. The changes have been thoroughly tested and are expected to significantly enhance the project's functionality.
📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
🧪 Relevant tests added: No
🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and addresses important issues in the project. However, it would be beneficial to include unit tests for the new functions introduced in the PR. This would help ensure the robustness of the code and prevent potential issues in the future.
🤖 Code feedback:
- relevant file: pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py
  suggestion: Consider handling exceptions in the 'create_inline_comment' function. This would help in debugging and prevent potential crashes. [important]
  relevant line: def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str):
- relevant file: pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py
  suggestion: The 'run' function has a lot of nested if-else conditions. Consider refactoring this function to improve readability and maintainability. [medium]
  relevant line: if get_settings().config.git_provider == 'bitbucket':
- relevant file: pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py
  suggestion: The 'publish_inline_comments' function has been modified to handle Bitbucket specifically. It would be better to handle this within the Bitbucket provider itself to maintain the abstraction of the GitProvider interface. [important]
  relevant line: if get_settings().config.git_provider == 'bitbucket':
- relevant file: pr_agent/tools/pr_update_changelog.py
  suggestion: The assertion that checks if the git provider is Github has been commented out. If Bitbucket is now supported, consider removing this line instead of commenting it out. [medium]
  relevant line: # assert type(self.git_provider) == GithubProvider, "Currently only Github is supported"

How to use

Tag me in a comment '@CodiumAI-Agent' and add one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

sb0210 · 2023-08-30T11:48:49Z

@CodiumAI-Agent /improve --extended

CodiumAI-Agent · 2023-08-30T11:49:59Z

pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py

+            if get_settings().config.git_provider == 'bitbucket':
+                self.git_provider.publish_bitbucket_inline_comments(comments)
+            else:
+                self.git_provider.publish_inline_comments(comments)


Suggestion: Consider refactoring the code to avoid duplicating the publish_inline_comments method. You can create a single method that handles both cases, reducing code redundancy and improving maintainability.

Suggested change

if get_settings().config.git_provider == 'bitbucket':

self.git_provider.publish_bitbucket_inline_comments(comments)

else:

self.git_provider.publish_inline_comments(comments)

self.git_provider.publish_inline_comments(comments, is_bitbucket=get_settings().config.git_provider == 'bitbucket')

CodiumAI-Agent · 2023-08-30T11:49:59Z

pr_agent/tools/pr_update_changelog.py

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ def __init__(self, pr_url: str, cli_mode=False, args=None):
                                          get_settings().pr_update_changelog_prompt.user)

    async def run(self):
-        assert type(self.git_provider) == GithubProvider, "Currently only Github is supported"
+        # assert type(self.git_provider) == GithubProvider, "Currently only Github is supported"


Suggestion: Consider replacing the assertion with a more user-friendly error handling mechanism. Assertions can be turned off globally in the Python interpreter, and they are typically used for debugging, not for handling run-time errors.

Suggested change

# assert type(self.git_provider) == GithubProvider, "Currently only Github is supported"

if not isinstance(self.git_provider, GithubProvider):

raise NotImplementedError("Currently only Github is supported")

CodiumAI-Agent · 2023-08-30T11:50:00Z

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py

            "POST", self.bitbucket_comment_api_url, data=payload, headers=self.headers
        )
        return response


Suggestion: Consider using the requests.post method instead of requests.request with 'POST' as a parameter. This would make the code more readable and easier to understand.

Suggested change

"POST", self.bitbucket_comment_api_url, data=payload, headers=self.headers

)

return response

response = requests.post(self.bitbucket_comment_api_url, data=payload, headers=self.headers)

CodiumAI-Agent · 2023-08-30T11:50:00Z

pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py

+                if get_settings().config.git_provider == 'bitbucket':
+                    return 


Suggestion: Consider removing the redundant return statement in line 80. If the function doesn't need to return a value, there's no need to include a return statement.

Suggested change

if get_settings().config.git_provider == 'bitbucket':

return

if get_settings().config.git_provider == 'bitbucket':

pass

…_bitbucket_improve_issue

okotek · 2023-09-04T07:59:14Z

pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py

-                    self.git_provider.publish_labels(pr_types + current_labels)
+                # bitbucket does not support publishing PR labels yet
+                if get_settings().config.git_provider == 'bitbucket':
+                    return 


Shouldn't refer explicitly to a Git provider outside the git providers types (use "is_supported")

…_bitbucket_improve_issue

okotek · 2023-09-07T15:25:31Z

@sarbjitsinghgrewal sorry for the delay, will review and merge early next week

okotek · 2023-09-07T15:41:37Z

@CodiumAI-Agent review

CodiumAI-Agent · 2023-09-07T15:42:54Z

PR Analysis

🎯 Main theme: This PR aims to improve the Bitbucket-related functionalities of the PR-Agent tool. It introduces new functions to support inline comments, fixes a bug in the "describe" command, and enables the addition of comments for updating the Changelog on Bitbucket.
📝 PR summary: The PR introduces several improvements to the Bitbucket-related functionalities of the PR-Agent tool. It adds support for inline comments, fixes a bug in the "describe" command, and enables the addition of comments for updating the Changelog on Bitbucket. The changes have been tested thoroughly to ensure their effectiveness.
📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
🧪 Relevant tests added: No
🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR introduces several enhancements to the Bitbucket-related functionalities of the PR-Agent tool. However, it would be beneficial to include unit tests to verify the new functionalities and changes. This would help ensure the robustness of the code and prevent potential regressions in the future.
🤖 Code feedback:
- relevant file: pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py
  suggestion: It seems like the publish_bitbucket_inline_comments function is very similar to the publish_inline_comments function. Consider refactoring these functions to avoid code duplication. You could create a more generic function that handles the publishing of inline comments and then call this function from both publish_bitbucket_inline_comments and publish_inline_comments. [important]
  relevant line: def publish_bitbucket_inline_comments(self, comments: list[dict]):
- relevant file: pr_agent/tools/pr_description.py
  suggestion: The check for the git provider in the run method could be improved. Instead of checking the git provider and returning if it's 'bitbucket', consider implementing the functionality for 'bitbucket' or throwing an exception if the git provider is not supported. This would make the code more robust and easier to extend in the future. [medium]
  relevant line: if get_settings().config.git_provider == 'bitbucket':
- relevant file: pr_agent/tools/pr_reviewer.py
  suggestion: Similar to the previous suggestion, the check for the git provider in the _publish_inline_code_comments method could be improved. Consider implementing the functionality for 'bitbucket' or throwing an exception if the git provider is not supported. This would make the code more robust and easier to extend in the future. [medium]
  relevant line: if get_settings().config.git_provider == 'bitbucket':
- relevant file: pr_agent/tools/pr_update_changelog.py
  suggestion: The commented out assertion that checks if the git provider is Github could be removed if it's no longer needed. If the functionality is now supported for other git providers, consider updating the assertion to check for those providers. [medium]
  relevant line: # assert type(self.git_provider) == GithubProvider, "Currently only Github is supported"

How to use

Tag me in a comment '@CodiumAI-Agent' and add one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

sarbjitsinghgrewal added 5 commits August 24, 2023 11:52

fix improve, update_changelog and review inline comment

67ff505

update readme

db6bf41

Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent into fix…

f0dc485

…_bitbucket_improve_issue

add publish_labels and get_labels functions

0e42634

fix conflicts

39522ab

Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent into fix…

2aaa722

…_bitbucket_improve_issue

CodiumAI-Agent reviewed Aug 30, 2023

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent into fix…

970a789

…_bitbucket_improve_issue

okotek reviewed Sep 4, 2023

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/Codium-ai/pr-agent into fix…

704c169

…_bitbucket_improve_issue

Codium-ai deleted a comment from CodiumAI-Agent Sep 7, 2023

Codium-ai deleted a comment from github-actions bot Sep 7, 2023

okotek merged commit 704c169 into Codium-ai:main Sep 10, 2023
1 check failed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Fix bitbucket improve issue #240

Fix bitbucket improve issue #240

sarbjitsinghgrewal commented Aug 24, 2023

mrT23 commented Aug 28, 2023

sb0210 commented Aug 30, 2023

CodiumAI-Agent commented Aug 30, 2023

sb0210 commented Aug 30, 2023

CodiumAI-Agent Aug 30, 2023

CodiumAI-Agent Aug 30, 2023

CodiumAI-Agent Aug 30, 2023

CodiumAI-Agent Aug 30, 2023

okotek Sep 4, 2023

okotek commented Sep 7, 2023

okotek commented Sep 7, 2023

CodiumAI-Agent commented Sep 7, 2023

	# assert type(self.git_provider) == GithubProvider, "Currently only Github is supported"
	if not isinstance(self.git_provider, GithubProvider):
	raise NotImplementedError("Currently only Github is supported")

Fix bitbucket improve issue #240

Fix bitbucket improve issue #240

Conversation

sarbjitsinghgrewal commented Aug 24, 2023

mrT23 commented Aug 28, 2023

sb0210 commented Aug 30, 2023

CodiumAI-Agent commented Aug 30, 2023

PR Analysis

PR Feedback

How to use

sb0210 commented Aug 30, 2023

CodiumAI-Agent Aug 30, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

CodiumAI-Agent Aug 30, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

CodiumAI-Agent Aug 30, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

CodiumAI-Agent Aug 30, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

okotek Sep 4, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

okotek commented Sep 7, 2023

okotek commented Sep 7, 2023

CodiumAI-Agent commented Sep 7, 2023

PR Analysis

PR Feedback

How to use