-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Highlighter fix #4721
Merged
Merged
Highlighter fix #4721
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
41ae51d
Fixed the use of partitioningIndex(where:) in ChartDataSet.entriesForβ¦
mbharry 799ec91
Merge branch 'master' into 4719-highlighter-fix
kcome 85cc87d
Fix rounding method to "closest" if there is a result.
kcome e2d2038
Add back `setNeedsDisplay` when deselect currently highlighted bar.
kcome 30538b3
Update closestXValue when rounding method is closest.
kcome File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe this line should be:
Note the
>=
instead of==
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you explain why?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually nevermind, sorry for bothering you! Please disregard this and other comments - I'll delete them.
My thinking was that
partitioningIndex
function requires that all values after the desired index match the expression, but after looking more carefully I see the addedpartition
function before runningpartitioningIndex
- I'm guessing the intention is to make it possible to search in non-ordered data. I'm a little worried about the performance here, but otherwise I think the implementation is correct, except one detail: comparing Doubles directly. This is probably bigger discussion about the library design, but basically due to Double representation in memory, we should never compare Doubles using the equality operator. This will break for example in a simple case:0.3 != 0.1 + 0.2
. But as I said, that's probably a separate discussion.