Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Freshen the simple exchange dApp #676

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2020
Merged

Conversation

michaelfig
Copy link
Member

Refs #646

It should at least compile, deploy, and run.

Refs #646

It should at least compile, deploy, and run.
Copy link
Contributor

@katelynsills katelynsills left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some questions but otherwise looks fine to me

// =====================

// 5. Offer rules
const [unit0, unit1] = await Promise.all([
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code was creating the initial liquidity. Are we doing that elsewhere?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does simple-exchange need liquidity? I didn't know that.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It could benefit from some initial orders in the order book in the same way that we added liquidity to autoswap. It will still work without seeding with initial orders, but will be a worse user experience.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a good idea. I'll make this work.

@michaelfig michaelfig merged commit e77df29 into master Mar 15, 2020
@michaelfig michaelfig deleted the mfig/646-simple-exchange-refresh branch March 15, 2020 04:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants