Add VatTP-over-IBC #1338
Add VatTP-over-IBC #1338
Conversation
michaelfig
force-pushed
the
259-vattp-ibc
branch
from
69b2629
to
e46cad9
Compare
michaelfig
force-pushed
the
259-vattp-ibc
branch
from
e46cad9
to
86fbdbc
Compare
michaelfig
added
cosmic-swingset
| @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ func handleMsgProvision(ctx sdk.Context, keeper Keeper, msg MsgProvision) (*sdk. | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| // Create the account, if it doesn't already exist. | |||
| egress := types.NewEgress(msg.Nickname, msg.Address) | |||
| egress := types.NewEgress(msg.Nickname, msg.Address, msg.PowerFlags) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Am I correct in thinking that the author of the ProvisionOne transaction can choose whatever PowerFlags they want (i.e. the single "give them everything" one we added, which only actually gives them the ability to set up network connections), but these transactions will only be accepted in messages signed by keys associated with accounts that hold a provisionpass token? And that this PR doesn't show the provisionpass check because that was already present in the previous revisions?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is no "give them everything" flag when running on a real chain. That only exists when running on the fake chain. You are correct that this is checked against the provisionpass, which was already present.
michaelfig
force-pushed
the
259-vattp-ibc
branch
from
86fbdbc
to
5b68af5
Compare
This implements the demo described in #259.