refactor: use regexp-groups to simplify ignores

[ST-DDT]

Implement idea suggested here: #2773 (comment)

• feat(no-deprecated-slot-attribute): regex ignore patterns #2773 (comment)

---

Excluding/Ignoring things is a common task in rules. This PR creates a helper that hides all the string[] -> regexp[] -> boolean logic in a simple helper function.

const options = context.options[0] || {}
const { ignore = [] } = options
const ignoreGroupMatcher = regexp.toRegExpGroupMatcher(ignore)

...

 if (
  ignoreGroupMatcher(
    componentName,
    casing.pascalCase(componentName),
    casing.kebabCase(componentName)
  )
) {
  // skip
  return
}

The current project contains at least 9 instances of .map(toRegExp) + a few more using more verbose syntax.

If the general design of this feature is accepted, I will convert the other locations to the new feature and mark this PR as POC.

I'm not super happy with the method name and jsdocs, so any input would be appreciated.

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: cb9a52f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[FloEdelmann]

I like the idea! It would be great to see it used a lot more in the whole codebase 🙂

[ST-DDT]

I like the idea! I would be great to see it used a lot more in the whole codebase 🙂

Does that count as

the general design of this feature is accepted

so that I should start converting the rest of the applicable locations?

[FloEdelmann]

I should start converting the rest of the applicable locations?

That would be great! Do you want to want to give it a go?

[ST-DDT]

Ready for review/merge.

There are a few locations left, that either use plain string[] ignore lists or just use a single ignore pattern, that I haven't touched, but I think they can be enhanced in later PRs on demand.