Skip to content

Introduce PlatformHandles API #101

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jakepetroules
Copy link
Contributor

@jakepetroules jakepetroules commented Jun 30, 2025

Imbue Execution with a new PlatformHandles structure which provides access to platform-specific handles used to control the process while it is running. This is necessary for interop with certain platform-native APIs, especially on Windows.

One test has been introduced which shows how this API could be used to associate a subprocess with a Job Object using the Windows API.

In future, the idea is that PlatformHandles could store a process descriptor on Linux (clone3(..., CLONE_PIDFD) / pidfd_open) and FreeBSD (pdfork), or other platforms which may have or introduce similar concepts in the future.

Somewhat related article with some good info: https://gaultier.github.io/blog/way_too_many_ways_to_wait_for_a_child_process_with_a_timeout.html

Imbue Execution with a new PlatformHandles structure which provides access to platform-specific handles used to control the process while it is running. This is necessary for interop with certain platform-native APIs, especially on Windows.

One test has been introduced which shows how this API could be used to associate a subprocess with a Job Object using the Windows API.

In future, the idea is that PlatformHandles could store a process descriptor on Linux (clone3(..., CLONE_PIDFD) / pidfd_open) and FreeBSD (pdfork), or other platforms which may have or introduce similar concepts in the future.
@jakepetroules jakepetroules force-pushed the eng/PR-platform-handles branch from eba918b to e0559da Compare July 1, 2025 00:43
Copy link
Contributor

@iCharlesHu iCharlesHu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This API changes needs to be discussed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants