Skip to content

Ports #[macro_use] and #[macro_escape] to the new attribute parsing infrastructure #143843

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Contributor

Ports #[macro_use] and #[macro_escape] to the new attribute parsing infrastructure for #131229 (comment)

r? @jdonszelmann @oli-obk

Currently blocked on #143796, is in the merge queue right now should be fixed soon
@rustbot blocked

…trVisitor

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
…ng infrastructure

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 12, 2025

jdonszelmann is currently at their maximum review capacity.
They may take a while to respond.

@rustbot rustbot added A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 12, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 12, 2025

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing

cc @jdonszelmann

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_attr.rs

cc @jdonszelmann

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy

cc @rust-lang/clippy

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_data_structures

cc @jdonszelmann

@rustbot rustbot added the S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. label Jul 12, 2025
@@ -84,7 +85,7 @@ pub(crate) trait AttributeParser<S: Stage>: Default + 'static {
/// that'd be equivalent to unconditionally applying an attribute to
/// every single syntax item that could have attributes applied to it.
/// Your accept mappings should determine whether this returns something.
fn finalize(self, cx: &FinalizeContext<'_, '_, S>) -> Option<AttributeKind>;
fn finalize(self, cx: &mut FinalizeContext<'_, '_, S>) -> Option<AttributeKind>;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've changed this to a mutable reference because I need a mutable reference to produce errors.
I'm assuming it not being mutable was just a mistake

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-blocked Status: Blocked on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants