Skip to content

Split methods pass take 2 #15280

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

Jarcho
Copy link
Contributor

@Jarcho Jarcho commented Jul 15, 2025

Blocked on #15279, #15277 and #15270.

This still needs dev new_lints changes and some cleanup work needs to be done. First commit of the split just moves the files to their new location. Hopefully that's enough to allow git to deal with merging nicely.

cc @flip1995

changelog: none

Summary Notes

Managed by @rustbot—see help for details

@Jarcho Jarcho added the S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work label Jul 15, 2025
Copy link

Seems that you are trying to add a new lint!

We are currently in a feature freeze, so we are delaying all lint-adding PRs to September 18 and focusing on bugfixes.

Thanks a lot for your contribution, and sorry for the inconvenience.

With ❤ from the Clippy team.

@rustbot note Feature-freeze
@rustbot blocked
@rustbot label +A-lint

@rustbot rustbot added the A-lint Area: New lints label Jul 15, 2025
@Jarcho Jarcho force-pushed the split_methods_pass branch 2 times, most recently from a47996a to 461e0e3 Compare July 15, 2025 18:35
@Jarcho Jarcho removed the A-lint Area: New lints label Jul 15, 2025
@Jarcho Jarcho force-pushed the split_methods_pass branch from 275fc1b to 2730f94 Compare July 15, 2025 23:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-blocked Status: marked as blocked ❌ on something else such as an RFC or other implementation work
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants