Skip to content

Update the params-latest file with the new registries #1050

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 11, 2025

Conversation

atheo89
Copy link
Member

@atheo89 atheo89 commented Jul 11, 2025

Related to: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-28512

Add some inputs on this file, in order the nudging start over an update with the correct sha references.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bS8p3Rs54dSY2hlcR-op_jvRisG2L6r-gjTS7THCcAk/edit?gid=0#gid=0

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from daniellutz and harshad16 July 11, 2025 10:20
@atheo89 atheo89 requested a review from jiridanek July 11, 2025 10:26
@atheo89
Copy link
Member Author

atheo89 commented Jul 11, 2025

/hold

@atheo89
Copy link
Member Author

atheo89 commented Jul 11, 2025

/unhold

@jstourac
Copy link
Member

any plans on looking into these or we won't care anymore? 🤔

time="2025-07-11T11:06:12Z" level=fatal msg="Error parsing image name \"docker://quay.io/modh/odh-pipeline-runtime-tensorflow-rocm-py312-ubi9@sha256:00f1841caaf7021dfbb92bf5d80e3aab9e6879e83ee44d66a4b499ffa8972090\": reading manifest sha256:00f1841caaf7021dfbb92bf5d80e3aab9e6879e83ee44d66a4b499ffa8972090 in quay.io/modh/odh-pipeline-runtime-tensorflow-rocm-py312-ubi9: unauthorized: access to the requested resource is not authorized"
Unimplemented variable name: 'odh-workbench-jupyter-tensorflow-cuda-py312-ubi9-n'
ERROR: Image definition for 'odh-workbench-jupyter-tensorflow-cuda-py312-ubi9-n' isn't okay!

@atheo89
Copy link
Member Author

atheo89 commented Jul 11, 2025

I will move this in to unblock nudging work that needs from devOps side. Once we have some build in place I will open a follow up to update main branch.
/lgtm
/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 11, 2025

@atheo89: you cannot LGTM your own PR.

In response to this:

I will move this in to unblock nudging work that needs from devOps side. Once we have some build in place I will open a follow up to update main branch.
/lgtm
/approve

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 11, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: atheo89

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@atheo89 atheo89 merged commit 55474c7 into red-hat-data-services:main Jul 11, 2025
9 of 12 checks passed
@atheo89
Copy link
Member Author

atheo89 commented Jul 11, 2025

any plans on looking into these or we won't care anymore? 🤔

time="2025-07-11T11:06:12Z" level=fatal msg="Error parsing image name \"docker://quay.io/modh/odh-pipeline-runtime-tensorflow-rocm-py312-ubi9@sha256:00f1841caaf7021dfbb92bf5d80e3aab9e6879e83ee44d66a4b499ffa8972090\": reading manifest sha256:00f1841caaf7021dfbb92bf5d80e3aab9e6879e83ee44d66a4b499ffa8972090 in quay.io/modh/odh-pipeline-runtime-tensorflow-rocm-py312-ubi9: unauthorized: access to the requested resource is not authorized"
Unimplemented variable name: 'odh-workbench-jupyter-tensorflow-cuda-py312-ubi9-n'
ERROR: Image definition for 'odh-workbench-jupyter-tensorflow-cuda-py312-ubi9-n' isn't okay!

@jstourac Ι guess these updates will be incorporated once this be in place: opendatahub-io#1336

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants