-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.3k
gh-131798: JIT: Further optimize _CALL_ISINSTANCE
for class tuples
#134543
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ | ||
Optimize ``_CALL_ISINSTANCE`` in the JIT when the second argument is a tuple | ||
of classes. |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -938,6 +938,9 @@ dummy_func(void) { | |
} | ||
|
||
op(_CALL_ISINSTANCE, (unused, unused, instance, cls -- res)) { | ||
// The below define is equivalent to PyObject_TypeCheck(inst, cls) | ||
#define sym_IS_SUBTYPE(inst, cls) ((inst) == (cls) || PyType_IsSubtype(inst, cls)) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm not sure about this define, maybe it's fine to duplicate this logic? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'll let you choose. We should probably either duplicate it, or just make it a proper function in |
||
|
||
// the result is always a bool, but sometimes we can | ||
// narrow it down to True or False | ||
res = sym_new_type(ctx, &PyBool_Type); | ||
|
@@ -947,14 +950,54 @@ dummy_func(void) { | |
// isinstance(inst, cls) where both inst and cls have | ||
// known types, meaning we can deduce either True or False | ||
|
||
// The below check is equivalent to PyObject_TypeCheck(inst, cls) | ||
PyObject *out = Py_False; | ||
if (inst_type == cls_o || PyType_IsSubtype(inst_type, cls_o)) { | ||
if (sym_IS_SUBTYPE(inst_type, cls_o)) { | ||
out = Py_True; | ||
} | ||
sym_set_const(res, out); | ||
REPLACE_OP(this_instr, _POP_CALL_TWO_LOAD_CONST_INLINE_BORROW, 0, (uintptr_t)out); | ||
} | ||
else if (inst_type && sym_matches_type(cls, &PyTuple_Type)) { | ||
// isinstance(inst, tup) where inst has a known type and tup is a tuple. | ||
// We can deduce True if inst is an instance of at least one of | ||
// the items in the tuple. | ||
// We can deduce False if all items in the tuple have known types and | ||
// inst is not an instance of any of them. | ||
|
||
int length = sym_tuple_length(cls); | ||
if (length != -1) { | ||
// We cannot do anything about tuples with unknown length | ||
bool all_items_known = true; | ||
PyObject *out = NULL; | ||
for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) { | ||
JitOptSymbol *item = sym_tuple_getitem(ctx, cls, i); | ||
if (!sym_has_type(item)) { | ||
// There is an unknown item in the tuple, | ||
// we can no longer deduce False. | ||
all_items_known = false; | ||
continue; | ||
} | ||
Comment on lines
+974
to
+979
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We can't infer anything in this case, since the class could do anything in its So I don't think we need
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I guess we could still do something like this if we know There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just to check if I understood this point: even if we have something like So basically what you said, once we see an item with an unknown type, we must stop. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Basically, yeah. It's a bit more subtle, though: we can infer the result to be So we can set a There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome, that was pretty much my understanding as well :) I'll fix the PR hopefully this weekend. |
||
PyTypeObject *cls_o = (PyTypeObject *)sym_get_const(ctx, item); | ||
if (cls_o && | ||
sym_matches_type(item, &PyType_Type) && | ||
sym_IS_SUBTYPE(inst_type, cls_o)) | ||
{ | ||
out = Py_True; | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
if (!out && all_items_known) { | ||
// We haven't deduced True, but all items in the tuple are known | ||
// so we can deduce False | ||
out = Py_False; | ||
} | ||
if (out) { | ||
sym_set_const(res, out); | ||
REPLACE_OP(this_instr, _POP_CALL_TWO_LOAD_CONST_INLINE_BORROW, 0, (uintptr_t)out); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
#undef sym_IS_SUBTYPE | ||
} | ||
|
||
op(_GUARD_IS_TRUE_POP, (flag -- )) { | ||
|
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
_BUILD_TUPLE
is preventing us from optimizing out_POP_CALL_TWO_LOAD_CONST_INLINE_BORROW
.The bytecode is basically:
To optimize this, we'd need some special handling for
_BUILD_TUPLE
inremove_unneeded_uops
.