-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8361180: Disable CompiledDirectCall verification with -VerifyInlineCaches #26063
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Trivial.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me too.
Thanks! Here goes. /integrate |
Going to push as commit 1ac7489.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Missed the spot when doing JDK-8360867. There is a path from GC that calls into IC verification when cleaning the caches. See
nmethod::cleanup_inline_caches_impl
. It does verification per callsite, and does the whole thing during parallel GC cleanup, which is STW at least in G1. This gets expensive for CTW scenarios. We should wrap that under the same flag introduced by JDK-8360867.Motivational improvements:
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26063/head:pull/26063
$ git checkout pull/26063
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26063
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26063/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26063
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26063
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26063.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment