Skip to content

Correcting Misleading Protected Modifiers in Presenter class #347

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mildabre
Copy link
Contributor

@mildabre mildabre commented Jun 14, 2025

In the ApplicationExtension class, the checkPresenter() method enforces that the presenter methods startup(), beforeRender(), afterRender(), and shutdown() must be public and non-static. However, in the base abstract Presenter class within the Nette framework, these methods are defined as protected. While this does not prevent them from being overridden in derived classes, it introduces unnecessary confusion and lacks clear justification.

After upgrading my projects to the latest version of Nette, ApplicationExtension started throwing exceptions such as:

Nette\InvalidStateException: Method Nette\Application\UI\Presenter::checkHttpMethod(): this method must be public non-static.

This issue occurred only in some older projects that had not been updated for a long time, even though all final presenters had correctly set modifiers as public, while the majority of my updated projects remained unaffected. I could not determine why certain projects triggered the exception while others did not. However, after manually refactoring the Presenter class inside /vendor/ and changing the visibility of the mentioned methods from protected to public, the issue was completely resolved—without any loss of normal presenter functionality.

Proposed Change
I propose modifying the affected methods in the nette/application package by changing their visibility from protected to public, for two key reasons:

a) eliminating unnecessary confusion - the protected modifier in this context serves no meaningful purpose and only introduces ambiguity.

b) preventing unnecessary exceptions - under specific conditions, even syntactically correct final presenters can unexpectedly trigger errors, which this change would effectively prevent.

I opened this theme for public discussion on forum nette

dg and others added 22 commits September 10, 2024 12:09
- inteface Nette\Application\IRouter replaced by Nette\Routing\Router
…e() for persistent parameters. [Closes nette/nette#703][Closes nette/nette#703][Closes nette#69]" (possible BC break)

This reverts commit cda17f4.

See https://forum.nette.org/cs/35528-stejne-pojmenovany-parametr-akce-presenteru-a-persistentni-odlisne-chovani-v-nette-2-0-oproti-aktualnimu#p221742

BC break: Property must be nullable, ie: #[Persistent] public ?int $foo
…rs dynamically (BC break)

TODO: scanDir must be active
@mildabre
Copy link
Contributor Author

By reviewing the incriminated project, I found that the protected modifiers were not the cause of the false exception being thrown. However, the first and main argument for the change remains, the simplification of unnecessarily complex code.

@dg dg force-pushed the master branch 3 times, most recently from 3463b9a to ee24f8e Compare June 19, 2025 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants