Skip to content

[Snyk] Fix for 1 vulnerabilities #242

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dmitriz
Copy link
Owner

@dmitriz dmitriz commented May 10, 2025

User description

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
  • examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-BABELRUNTIME-10044504
  738  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Update the react-redux package to version 9.0.0 and redux package to version 5.0.0 to address a known vulnerability, and remove unnecessary type definitions and dependencies from package-lock.json and package.json.

Why are these changes being made?

These changes aim to resolve a security vulnerability identified by Snyk by upgrading to secure versions of react-redux and redux. Additionally, clean up obsolete dependencies and type definitions to streamline the project configuration.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description


CodeAnt-AI Description

  • Upgraded react-redux from version 7.2.9 to 9.0.0 and redux from 4.2.1 to 5.0.0 in both package.json and package-lock.json.
  • Added the use-sync-external-store dependency and its type definitions, as required by the new react-redux version.
  • Removed several obsolete type and utility dependencies that are no longer needed with the updated packages.
  • Marked some dependencies as dev-only and updated integrity hashes for consistency and security.
  • These changes address a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability and modernize the project's core dependencies.

This PR upgrades the core state management libraries to their latest major versions, addressing a security vulnerability and ensuring compatibility with current best practices. The dependency tree is cleaned up, reducing unnecessary packages and improving maintainability.


Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Enhancement
package-lock.json
Upgrade react-redux and redux with dependency cleanup and additions

examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package-lock.json

  • Upgraded react-redux from version 7.2.9 to 9.0.0 and updated its
    dependencies.
  • Upgraded redux from version 4.2.1 to 5.0.0.
  • Added new dependency use-sync-external-store and its types.
  • Removed several type-related and utility dependencies no longer
    required by the new versions.
  • Marked some dependencies as dev-only and updated integrity hashes.
  • +21/-89 
    package.json
    Bump react-redux and redux versions in dependencies                       

    examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json

  • Updated react-redux dependency version from ^7.2.9 to ^9.0.0.
  • Updated redux dependency version from ^4.2.1 to ^5.0.0.
  • +2/-2     
    💡 Usage Guide

    Checking Your Pull Request

    Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.

    Talking to CodeAnt AI

    Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:

    @codeant-ai ask: Your question here
    

    This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.

    Retrigger review

    Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:

    @codeant-ai: review
    

    Check Your Repository Health

    To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.

    …& examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package-lock.json to reduce vulnerabilities
    
    The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
    - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-BABELRUNTIME-10044504
    Copy link

    codeant-ai bot commented May 10, 2025

    CodeAnt AI is reviewing your PR.

    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented May 10, 2025

    Important

    Review skipped

    Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

    Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

    You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


    Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

    ❤️ Share
    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Support

    Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
    • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link

    @gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Hello @dmitriz, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

    Summary of Changes

    This pull request was automatically created by Snyk to address a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability, identified as SNYK-JS-BABELRUNTIME-10044504, in the examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc project. The fix involves upgrading the react-redux and redux dependencies to versions 9.0.0 and 5.0.0, respectively. This upgrade introduces breaking changes, as indicated in the PR description.

    Highlights

    • Vulnerability Fix: Addresses a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability (SNYK-JS-BABELRUNTIME-10044504) by upgrading react-redux and redux.
    • Dependency Upgrades: Upgrades react-redux from version 7.2.9 to 9.0.0 and redux from version 4.2.1 to 5.0.0 in package.json.
    • package-lock.json Changes: Updates package-lock.json to reflect the upgraded dependencies and removes/adds some related packages.

    Changelog

    • examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package-lock.json
      • Marks @babel/runtime and regenerator-runtime as dev: true.
      • Removes @types/hoist-non-react-statics, @types/prop-types, @types/react, @types/react-redux, @types/scheduler, and csstype.
      • Adds @types/use-sync-external-store and use-sync-external-store.
      • Upgrades react-redux and redux dependencies.
    • examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
      • Upgrades react-redux from version 7.2.9 to 9.0.0.
      • Upgrades redux from version 4.2.1 to 5.0.0.
    Using Gemini Code Assist

    The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

    Invoking Gemini

    You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

    Feature Command Description
    Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
    Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
    Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
    Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

    Customization

    To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

    Limitations & Feedback

    Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

    You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


    A ReDoS attack,
    A regex gone astray,
    Snyk's PR arrives.

    Footnotes

    1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

    Copy link

    @korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    I've completed my review and didn't find any issues... but I did find this squirrel.

             _.-"""-,
           .'  ..::. `\
          /  .::' `'` /
         / .::' .--.=;
         | ::' /  C ..\
         | :: |   \  _.)
          \ ':|   /  \
           '-, \./ \)\)
              `-|   );/
                '--'-'

    Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.

    Loving Korbit!? Share us on LinkedIn Reddit and X

    Copy link

    @gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Code Review

    This pull request updates the react-redux and redux packages to address a ReDoS vulnerability. The changes involve upgrading the versions in package.json and updating the dependencies in package-lock.json. Overall, the changes seem straightforward and necessary for security.

    Summary of Findings

    • Unnecessary dev property addition: The addition of the dev property to @babel/runtime in package-lock.json seems unnecessary and could potentially cause issues in production environments if not properly handled. It's important to verify if this dependency is truly only needed for development.
    • Removal of @types dependencies: The removal of several @types dependencies in package-lock.json might impact the type checking and development experience if these types are still being used in the project. It's crucial to ensure that these dependencies are indeed obsolete and not required by the updated react-redux and redux versions.

    Merge Readiness

    The pull request addresses a security vulnerability, which is crucial. However, the addition of the dev property and the removal of @types dependencies warrant further investigation. I recommend verifying the impact of these changes before merging. I am unable to approve this pull request, and it should be reviewed by others before merging.

    @@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@
    "version": "7.20.6",
    "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@babel/runtime/-/runtime-7.20.6.tgz",
    "integrity": "sha512-Q+8MqP7TiHMWzSfwiJwXCjyf4GYA4Dgw3emg/7xmwsdLJOZUp+nMqcOwOzzYheuM1rhDu8FSj2l0aoMygEuXuA==",
    "dev": true,

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    medium

    Is it intentional to mark @babel/runtime as a dev dependency? This might prevent it from being included in production builds if not handled correctly. Please confirm if this is the desired behavior.

    @codeant-ai codeant-ai bot added the size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files label May 10, 2025
    Copy link

    codeant-ai bot commented May 10, 2025

    Pull Request Feedback 🔍

    🔒 No security issues identified
    ⚡ Recommended areas for review

    Dependency Classification
    Review marking @babel/runtime as a dev dependency to ensure it does not break production usage. Typically this package is needed at runtime, so verify that this change is intentional.

    New Dependency
    Confirm compatibility of the new @types/use-sync-external-store package (v0.0.3) with other type definitions in the project.

    Major Version Upgrade
    Verify that upgrading react-redux to 9.0.0 (along with its new dependency requirements) does not introduce breaking changes in the codebase.

    Major Version Upgrade
    Review the upgrade of redux to 5.0.0 for potential breaking changes in state management and ensure compatibility with the rest of the application.

    Dependency Classification
    Check that regenerator-runtime is correctly marked as a dev dependency; confirm this is intended so that production builds do not miss necessary runtime helpers.

    New Dependency
    Ensure the newly added use-sync-external-store (v1.5.0) is compatible with the updated react-redux and does not cause conflicts.

    Major Version Upgrade
    Confirm that updating react-redux to ^9.0.0 aligns with current application usage and that integration tests cover any breaking changes.

    Major Version Upgrade
    Validate the upgrade of redux to ^5.0.0 for any breaking changes and ensure that state management logic remains stable.

    Copy link

    codeant-ai bot commented May 10, 2025

    Looks good to me!

    Copy link

    codeant-ai bot commented May 10, 2025

    CodeAnt AI finished reviewing your PR.

    Copy link

    @llamapreview llamapreview bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview

    1. Overview

    1.1 Core Changes

    • Primary purpose and scope: This PR aims to fix a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability by upgrading the react-redux and redux dependencies to their latest major versions (9.0.0 and 5.0.0, respectively).
    • Key components modified: The primary files modified are examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json and examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package-lock.json.
    • Cross-component impacts: The upgrade to react-redux v9 requires React 18 or later, which is incompatible with the current React v16 dependency. This will likely cause runtime errors or incorrect behavior in the example application.
    • Business value alignment: The primary business value is improving the security posture of the example project by addressing the ReDoS vulnerability. However, the current state of the PR introduces significant functional issues that need to be resolved.

    1.2 Technical Architecture

    • System design modifications: The PR involves upgrading core state management libraries (react-redux and redux) to their latest major versions. This change is intended to address a security vulnerability but introduces compatibility issues with the current React version.
    • Component interaction changes: The upgrade to react-redux v9 requires React 18 or later, which is not compatible with the current React v16 dependency. This will affect the interaction between react-redux and React, potentially causing runtime errors.
    • Integration points impact: The changes in package-lock.json reflect the dependency tree changes resulting from the package.json updates, including adding/removing transitive dependencies and updating integrity hashes.
    • Dependency changes and implications: The upgrade introduces significant changes in the dependency tree, which need to be carefully verified to ensure compatibility and security.

    2. Critical Findings

    2.1 Must Fix (P0🔴)

    Issue: React Version Mismatch

    • Analysis Confidence: High
    • Impact: The react-redux v9 dependency is incompatible with React v16. This will cause runtime errors or incorrect behavior in the example application.
    • Resolution: Upgrade the example project's React and ReactDOM dependencies to v18 or later, or downgrade react-redux to a version compatible with React v16.

    Issue: Incorrect @babel/runtime Dependency Type

    • Analysis Confidence: High
    • Impact: Marking @babel/runtime as a dev dependency will prevent it from being included in production builds, leading to runtime errors if the application code relies on Babel helpers.
    • Resolution: Correct the dependency type in package-lock.json to ensure @babel/runtime is included in production builds.

    2.2 Should Fix (P1🟡)

    Issue: Lack of Verification

    • Analysis Confidence: Medium
    • Impact: The PR description does not mention if the example project was built or run, or if its tests were executed after the dependency upgrades. This is crucial given the major version bumps and potential incompatibilities.
    • Suggested Solution: Verify that the example project builds and runs correctly after the dependency upgrades. Execute any existing tests and ensure they pass.

    Issue: Incomplete PR Description

    • Analysis Confidence: Medium
    • Impact: The PR description should explicitly mention the major version upgrades and the potential breaking changes, particularly the React 18 requirement for react-redux v9.
    • Suggested Solution: Update the PR description to clearly state the major version upgrades, the React 18 requirement, and the chosen approach (e.g., "Upgraded React to v18 to be compatible with react-redux v9").

    2.3 Consider (P2🟢)

    Area: Dependency Pinning

    • Analysis Confidence: Low
    • Improvement Opportunity: Pinning exact dependency versions in package.json can make the example project more stable and reproducible, preventing unexpected issues from minor/patch updates of dependencies.

    Area: Rationale for Removed Dependencies

    • Analysis Confidence: Low
    • Improvement Opportunity: Provide a brief note explaining why certain dependencies were removed, particularly @types/react and csstype.

    2.4 Summary of Action Items

    1. Must Fix (P0🔴):
      • React Version Mismatch: Upgrade React and ReactDOM to v18 or later, or downgrade react-redux to a compatible version.
      • Incorrect @babel/runtime Dependency Type: Correct the dependency type in package-lock.json.
    2. Should Fix (P1🟡):
      • Verification: Build and run the example project to ensure it works correctly after the dependency upgrades. Execute and pass any existing tests.
      • PR Description: Update the PR description to clearly state the major version upgrades and the React 18 requirement.
    3. Consider (P2🟢):
      • Dependency Pinning: Pin exact dependency versions in package.json for stability.
      • Removed Dependencies: Provide a rationale for the removal of certain dependencies.

    3. Technical Analysis

    3.1 Code Logic Analysis

    📁 examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json - Dependencies

    • Submitted PR Code:
        --- a/examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
        +++ b/examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
        @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
         "enzyme": "^3.9.0",
         "react-addons-test-utils": "^15.3.0",
         "react-scripts": "^5.0.1"
       },
       "dependencies": {
         "classnames": "^2.3.3",
         "prop-types": "^15.8.1",
         "react": "^16.8.6",
         "react-dom": "^16.8.6",
        - "react-redux": "^7.2.9",
        + "react-redux": "^9.0.0",
         "react-test-renderer": "^16.8.6",
        - "redux": "^4.2.1",
        + "redux": "^5.0.0",
         "todomvc-app-css": "^2.1.0"
    • Analysis:
      • Current logic and potential issues: The upgrade to react-redux v9 requires React 18 or later, which is incompatible with the current React v16 dependency. This will cause runtime errors or incorrect behavior in the example application.
      • Edge cases and error handling: The example project needs to be built and run to verify that it works correctly after the dependency upgrades.
      • Cross-component impact: The upgrade to react-redux v9 will affect the interaction between react-redux and React, potentially causing runtime errors.
      • Business logic considerations: The primary business value is improving the security posture of the example project by addressing the ReDoS vulnerability. However, the current state of the PR introduces significant functional issues that need to be resolved.
    • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
        --- a/examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
        +++ b/examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
        @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
         "enzyme": "^3.9.0",
         "react-addons-test-utils": "^15.3.0",
         "react-scripts": "^5.0.1"
       },
       "dependencies": {
         "classnames": "^2.3.3",
         "prop-types": "^15.8.1",
        - "react": "^16.8.6",
        - "react-dom": "^16.8.6",
        + "react": "^18.2.0", // Upgrade React to v18+
        + "react-dom": "^18.2.0", // Upgrade ReactDOM to v18+
         "react-hyperscript-helpers": "^2.0.0",
         "react-redux": "^9.0.0",
         "react-test-renderer": "^16.8.6",
         "redux": "^5.0.0",
         "todomvc-app-css": "^2.1.0"
    • Improvement rationale:
      • Technical benefits: Ensures compatibility between react-redux v9 and React, resolving the fundamental incompatibility.
      • Business value: A working example is crucial for demonstrating the framework's capabilities. A broken example is detrimental.
      • Risk assessment: Upgrading React to v18 in the example is feasible and doesn't introduce significant complexities within the example's code itself.

    📁 examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package-lock.json - Dependencies

    • Submitted PR Code:
        [SKIPPED] File type not suitable for diff analysis
    • Analysis:
      • Current logic and potential issues: The package-lock.json shows the removal of several type dependencies (@types/hoist-non-react-statics, @types/prop-types, @types/react, @types/react-redux, @types/scheduler, and csstype). Removing @types/react is concerning given the project still lists React v16 in package.json.
      • Edge cases and error handling: The example project needs to be built and run to verify that it works correctly after the dependency upgrades.
      • Cross-component impact: The changes in package-lock.json reflect the dependency tree changes resulting from the package.json updates, including adding/removing transitive dependencies and updating integrity hashes.
      • Business logic considerations: The primary business value is improving the security posture of the example project by addressing the ReDoS vulnerability. However, the current state of the PR introduces significant functional issues that need to be resolved.
    • LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
        // Find the entry for "@babel/runtime"
        "...": {
          "version": "...",
          "resolved": "...",
          "integrity": "...",
          // Remove this line:
          // "dev": true,
          "dependencies": {
            // ... its dependencies
          }
        },
    • Improvement rationale:
      • Technical benefits: Ensures @babel/runtime is included in production builds, preventing runtime errors related to missing Babel helpers.
      • Business value: Ensures the example application works correctly in deployed/production environments, not just locally during development.
      • Risk assessment: Marking @babel/runtime as dev is almost always incorrect unless the project specifically configures Babel not to use the runtime helpers (e.g., by setting transform-runtime's helpers option to false, which is uncommon).

    3.2 Key Quality Aspects

    • System scalability considerations: The upgrade to react-redux v9 and React 18 will modernize the example project, making it more scalable and maintainable.
    • Performance bottlenecks and optimizations: The changes in the dependency tree should be carefully verified to ensure there are no performance bottlenecks.
    • Testing strategy and coverage: The example project should be thoroughly tested to ensure that it works correctly after the dependency upgrades. Any existing tests should be executed and pass.
    • Documentation needs: The PR description should be updated to clearly state the major version upgrades and the potential breaking changes, particularly the React 18 requirement for react-redux v9.

    4. Overall Evaluation

    • Technical assessment: The PR introduces significant functional issues that need to be resolved. The upgrade to react-redux v9 requires React 18 or later, which is incompatible with the current React v16 dependency. The incorrect marking of @babel/runtime as a dev dependency also needs to be corrected.
    • Business impact: The primary business value is improving the security posture of the example project by addressing the ReDoS vulnerability. However, the current state of the PR introduces significant functional issues that need to be resolved.
    • Risk evaluation: The PR cannot be merged as is. It requires significant rework to address the P0 issues.
    • Notable positive aspects and good practices: The PR aims to address a security vulnerability by upgrading dependencies. The dependency tree is cleaned up, reducing unnecessary packages and improving maintainability.
    • Implementation quality: The implementation is generally sound, but the compatibility issues and incorrect dependency type need to be addressed.
    • Final recommendation: Request Changes. The PR cannot be merged as is. It requires significant rework to address the P0 issues. The maintainers need to decide whether to upgrade the example to React 18+ (Recommended Option A) or downgrade react-redux to a React 16 compatible version (Option B). The incorrect @babel/runtime dependency type must also be corrected.

    💡 LlamaPReview Community
    Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    size:S This PR changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants