-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
[Snyk] Fix for 1 vulnerabilities #242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…& examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package-lock.json to reduce vulnerabilities The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade: - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-BABELRUNTIME-10044504
CodeAnt AI is reviewing your PR. |
Important Review skippedIgnore keyword(s) in the title. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @dmitriz, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request was automatically created by Snyk to address a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability, identified as SNYK-JS-BABELRUNTIME-10044504, in the examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc
project. The fix involves upgrading the react-redux
and redux
dependencies to versions 9.0.0 and 5.0.0, respectively. This upgrade introduces breaking changes, as indicated in the PR description.
Highlights
- Vulnerability Fix: Addresses a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability (SNYK-JS-BABELRUNTIME-10044504) by upgrading
react-redux
andredux
. - Dependency Upgrades: Upgrades
react-redux
from version 7.2.9 to 9.0.0 andredux
from version 4.2.1 to 5.0.0 inpackage.json
. - package-lock.json Changes: Updates
package-lock.json
to reflect the upgraded dependencies and removes/adds some related packages.
Changelog
- examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package-lock.json
- Marks
@babel/runtime
andregenerator-runtime
asdev: true
. - Removes
@types/hoist-non-react-statics
,@types/prop-types
,@types/react
,@types/react-redux
,@types/scheduler
, andcsstype
. - Adds
@types/use-sync-external-store
anduse-sync-external-store
. - Upgrades
react-redux
andredux
dependencies.
- Marks
- examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
- Upgrades
react-redux
from version 7.2.9 to 9.0.0. - Upgrades
redux
from version 4.2.1 to 5.0.0.
- Upgrades
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
A ReDoS attack,
A regex gone astray,
Snyk's PR arrives.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues... but I did find this squirrel.
_.-"""-,
.' ..::. `\
/ .::' `'` /
/ .::' .--.=;
| ::' / C ..\
| :: | \ _.)
\ ':| / \
'-, \./ \)\)
`-| );/
'--'-'
Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates the react-redux
and redux
packages to address a ReDoS vulnerability. The changes involve upgrading the versions in package.json
and updating the dependencies in package-lock.json
. Overall, the changes seem straightforward and necessary for security.
Summary of Findings
- Unnecessary
dev
property addition: The addition of thedev
property to@babel/runtime
inpackage-lock.json
seems unnecessary and could potentially cause issues in production environments if not properly handled. It's important to verify if this dependency is truly only needed for development. - Removal of
@types
dependencies: The removal of several@types
dependencies inpackage-lock.json
might impact the type checking and development experience if these types are still being used in the project. It's crucial to ensure that these dependencies are indeed obsolete and not required by the updatedreact-redux
andredux
versions.
Merge Readiness
The pull request addresses a security vulnerability, which is crucial. However, the addition of the dev
property and the removal of @types
dependencies warrant further investigation. I recommend verifying the impact of these changes before merging. I am unable to approve this pull request, and it should be reviewed by others before merging.
@@ -1320,6 +1320,7 @@ | |||
"version": "7.20.6", | |||
"resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@babel/runtime/-/runtime-7.20.6.tgz", | |||
"integrity": "sha512-Q+8MqP7TiHMWzSfwiJwXCjyf4GYA4Dgw3emg/7xmwsdLJOZUp+nMqcOwOzzYheuM1rhDu8FSj2l0aoMygEuXuA==", | |||
"dev": true, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Feedback 🔍
|
Looks good to me! |
CodeAnt AI finished reviewing your PR. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 Core Changes
- Primary purpose and scope: This PR aims to fix a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability by upgrading the
react-redux
andredux
dependencies to their latest major versions (9.0.0 and 5.0.0, respectively). - Key components modified: The primary files modified are
examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
andexamples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package-lock.json
. - Cross-component impacts: The upgrade to
react-redux
v9 requires React 18 or later, which is incompatible with the current React v16 dependency. This will likely cause runtime errors or incorrect behavior in the example application. - Business value alignment: The primary business value is improving the security posture of the example project by addressing the ReDoS vulnerability. However, the current state of the PR introduces significant functional issues that need to be resolved.
1.2 Technical Architecture
- System design modifications: The PR involves upgrading core state management libraries (
react-redux
andredux
) to their latest major versions. This change is intended to address a security vulnerability but introduces compatibility issues with the current React version. - Component interaction changes: The upgrade to
react-redux
v9 requires React 18 or later, which is not compatible with the current React v16 dependency. This will affect the interaction betweenreact-redux
and React, potentially causing runtime errors. - Integration points impact: The changes in
package-lock.json
reflect the dependency tree changes resulting from thepackage.json
updates, including adding/removing transitive dependencies and updating integrity hashes. - Dependency changes and implications: The upgrade introduces significant changes in the dependency tree, which need to be carefully verified to ensure compatibility and security.
2. Critical Findings
2.1 Must Fix (P0🔴)
Issue: React Version Mismatch
- Analysis Confidence: High
- Impact: The
react-redux
v9 dependency is incompatible with React v16. This will cause runtime errors or incorrect behavior in the example application. - Resolution: Upgrade the example project's React and ReactDOM dependencies to v18 or later, or downgrade
react-redux
to a version compatible with React v16.
Issue: Incorrect @babel/runtime
Dependency Type
- Analysis Confidence: High
- Impact: Marking
@babel/runtime
as a dev dependency will prevent it from being included in production builds, leading to runtime errors if the application code relies on Babel helpers. - Resolution: Correct the dependency type in
package-lock.json
to ensure@babel/runtime
is included in production builds.
2.2 Should Fix (P1🟡)
Issue: Lack of Verification
- Analysis Confidence: Medium
- Impact: The PR description does not mention if the example project was built or run, or if its tests were executed after the dependency upgrades. This is crucial given the major version bumps and potential incompatibilities.
- Suggested Solution: Verify that the example project builds and runs correctly after the dependency upgrades. Execute any existing tests and ensure they pass.
Issue: Incomplete PR Description
- Analysis Confidence: Medium
- Impact: The PR description should explicitly mention the major version upgrades and the potential breaking changes, particularly the React 18 requirement for
react-redux
v9. - Suggested Solution: Update the PR description to clearly state the major version upgrades, the React 18 requirement, and the chosen approach (e.g., "Upgraded React to v18 to be compatible with react-redux v9").
2.3 Consider (P2🟢)
Area: Dependency Pinning
- Analysis Confidence: Low
- Improvement Opportunity: Pinning exact dependency versions in
package.json
can make the example project more stable and reproducible, preventing unexpected issues from minor/patch updates of dependencies.
Area: Rationale for Removed Dependencies
- Analysis Confidence: Low
- Improvement Opportunity: Provide a brief note explaining why certain dependencies were removed, particularly
@types/react
andcsstype
.
2.4 Summary of Action Items
- Must Fix (P0🔴):
- React Version Mismatch: Upgrade React and ReactDOM to v18 or later, or downgrade
react-redux
to a compatible version. - Incorrect
@babel/runtime
Dependency Type: Correct the dependency type inpackage-lock.json
.
- React Version Mismatch: Upgrade React and ReactDOM to v18 or later, or downgrade
- Should Fix (P1🟡):
- Verification: Build and run the example project to ensure it works correctly after the dependency upgrades. Execute and pass any existing tests.
- PR Description: Update the PR description to clearly state the major version upgrades and the React 18 requirement.
- Consider (P2🟢):
- Dependency Pinning: Pin exact dependency versions in
package.json
for stability. - Removed Dependencies: Provide a rationale for the removal of certain dependencies.
- Dependency Pinning: Pin exact dependency versions in
3. Technical Analysis
3.1 Code Logic Analysis
📁 examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json - Dependencies
- Submitted PR Code:
--- a/examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
+++ b/examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
"enzyme": "^3.9.0",
"react-addons-test-utils": "^15.3.0",
"react-scripts": "^5.0.1"
},
"dependencies": {
"classnames": "^2.3.3",
"prop-types": "^15.8.1",
"react": "^16.8.6",
"react-dom": "^16.8.6",
- "react-redux": "^7.2.9",
+ "react-redux": "^9.0.0",
"react-test-renderer": "^16.8.6",
- "redux": "^4.2.1",
+ "redux": "^5.0.0",
"todomvc-app-css": "^2.1.0"
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The upgrade to
react-redux
v9 requires React 18 or later, which is incompatible with the current React v16 dependency. This will cause runtime errors or incorrect behavior in the example application. - Edge cases and error handling: The example project needs to be built and run to verify that it works correctly after the dependency upgrades.
- Cross-component impact: The upgrade to
react-redux
v9 will affect the interaction betweenreact-redux
and React, potentially causing runtime errors. - Business logic considerations: The primary business value is improving the security posture of the example project by addressing the ReDoS vulnerability. However, the current state of the PR introduces significant functional issues that need to be resolved.
- Current logic and potential issues: The upgrade to
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
--- a/examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
+++ b/examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
"enzyme": "^3.9.0",
"react-addons-test-utils": "^15.3.0",
"react-scripts": "^5.0.1"
},
"dependencies": {
"classnames": "^2.3.3",
"prop-types": "^15.8.1",
- "react": "^16.8.6",
- "react-dom": "^16.8.6",
+ "react": "^18.2.0", // Upgrade React to v18+
+ "react-dom": "^18.2.0", // Upgrade ReactDOM to v18+
"react-hyperscript-helpers": "^2.0.0",
"react-redux": "^9.0.0",
"react-test-renderer": "^16.8.6",
"redux": "^5.0.0",
"todomvc-app-css": "^2.1.0"
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures compatibility between
react-redux
v9 and React, resolving the fundamental incompatibility. - Business value: A working example is crucial for demonstrating the framework's capabilities. A broken example is detrimental.
- Risk assessment: Upgrading React to v18 in the example is feasible and doesn't introduce significant complexities within the example's code itself.
- Technical benefits: Ensures compatibility between
📁 examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package-lock.json - Dependencies
- Submitted PR Code:
[SKIPPED] File type not suitable for diff analysis
- Analysis:
- Current logic and potential issues: The
package-lock.json
shows the removal of several type dependencies (@types/hoist-non-react-statics
,@types/prop-types
,@types/react
,@types/react-redux
,@types/scheduler
, andcsstype
). Removing@types/react
is concerning given the project still lists React v16 inpackage.json
. - Edge cases and error handling: The example project needs to be built and run to verify that it works correctly after the dependency upgrades.
- Cross-component impact: The changes in
package-lock.json
reflect the dependency tree changes resulting from thepackage.json
updates, including adding/removing transitive dependencies and updating integrity hashes. - Business logic considerations: The primary business value is improving the security posture of the example project by addressing the ReDoS vulnerability. However, the current state of the PR introduces significant functional issues that need to be resolved.
- Current logic and potential issues: The
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
// Find the entry for "@babel/runtime"
"...": {
"version": "...",
"resolved": "...",
"integrity": "...",
// Remove this line:
// "dev": true,
"dependencies": {
// ... its dependencies
}
},
- Improvement rationale:
- Technical benefits: Ensures
@babel/runtime
is included in production builds, preventing runtime errors related to missing Babel helpers. - Business value: Ensures the example application works correctly in deployed/production environments, not just locally during development.
- Risk assessment: Marking
@babel/runtime
asdev
is almost always incorrect unless the project specifically configures Babel not to use the runtime helpers (e.g., by settingtransform-runtime
'shelpers
option tofalse
, which is uncommon).
- Technical benefits: Ensures
3.2 Key Quality Aspects
- System scalability considerations: The upgrade to
react-redux
v9 and React 18 will modernize the example project, making it more scalable and maintainable. - Performance bottlenecks and optimizations: The changes in the dependency tree should be carefully verified to ensure there are no performance bottlenecks.
- Testing strategy and coverage: The example project should be thoroughly tested to ensure that it works correctly after the dependency upgrades. Any existing tests should be executed and pass.
- Documentation needs: The PR description should be updated to clearly state the major version upgrades and the potential breaking changes, particularly the React 18 requirement for
react-redux
v9.
4. Overall Evaluation
- Technical assessment: The PR introduces significant functional issues that need to be resolved. The upgrade to
react-redux
v9 requires React 18 or later, which is incompatible with the current React v16 dependency. The incorrect marking of@babel/runtime
as a dev dependency also needs to be corrected. - Business impact: The primary business value is improving the security posture of the example project by addressing the ReDoS vulnerability. However, the current state of the PR introduces significant functional issues that need to be resolved.
- Risk evaluation: The PR cannot be merged as is. It requires significant rework to address the P0 issues.
- Notable positive aspects and good practices: The PR aims to address a security vulnerability by upgrading dependencies. The dependency tree is cleaned up, reducing unnecessary packages and improving maintainability.
- Implementation quality: The implementation is generally sound, but the compatibility issues and incorrect dependency type need to be addressed.
- Final recommendation: Request Changes. The PR cannot be merged as is. It requires significant rework to address the P0 issues. The maintainers need to decide whether to upgrade the example to React 18+ (Recommended Option A) or downgrade
react-redux
to a React 16 compatible version (Option B). The incorrect@babel/runtime
dependency type must also be corrected.
💡 LlamaPReview Community
Have feedback on this AI Code review tool? Join our GitHub Discussions to share your thoughts and help shape the future of LlamaPReview.
User description
Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.
Snyk changed the following file(s):
examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package-lock.json
Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:
SNYK-JS-BABELRUNTIME-10044504
Important
Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.
For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic
Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:
🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Update the
react-redux
package to version 9.0.0 andredux
package to version 5.0.0 to address a known vulnerability, and remove unnecessary type definitions and dependencies frompackage-lock.json
andpackage.json
.Why are these changes being made?
These changes aim to resolve a security vulnerability identified by Snyk by upgrading to secure versions of
react-redux
andredux
. Additionally, clean up obsolete dependencies and type definitions to streamline the project configuration.CodeAnt-AI Description
react-redux
from version 7.2.9 to 9.0.0 andredux
from 4.2.1 to 5.0.0 in bothpackage.json
andpackage-lock.json
.use-sync-external-store
dependency and its type definitions, as required by the newreact-redux
version.This PR upgrades the core state management libraries to their latest major versions, addressing a security vulnerability and ensuring compatibility with current best practices. The dependency tree is cleaned up, reducing unnecessary packages and improving maintainability.
Changes walkthrough
package-lock.json
Upgrade react-redux and redux with dependency cleanup and additions
examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package-lock.json
react-redux
from version 7.2.9 to 9.0.0 and updated itsdependencies.
redux
from version 4.2.1 to 5.0.0.use-sync-external-store
and its types.required by the new versions.
package.json
Bump react-redux and redux versions in dependencies
examples/interframeworkability/react-redux-todomvc/package.json
react-redux
dependency version from ^7.2.9 to ^9.0.0.redux
dependency version from ^4.2.1 to ^5.0.0.💡 Usage Guide
Checking Your Pull Request
Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.
Talking to CodeAnt AI
Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:
This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.
Retrigger review
Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:
Check Your Repository Health
To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.