Skip to content

The previous pull request and one new commit to support ForceAuthn in AuthnRequest #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

okko
Copy link

@okko okko commented Nov 4, 2011

ForceAuthn asks Shibboleth to ask the user to login every time and not remember the login from the session, making it possible to use Shibboleth SSO without Single-Signout.

okko and others added 14 commits September 29, 2011 14:32
…Name="givenName" Name="urn:oid:2.5.4.42" NameFormat="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:attrname-format:uri"><saml2:AttributeValue xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:type="xs:string">Oskari</saml2:AttributeValue></saml2:Attribute> used to give an empty Attribute Value, this fixes that.
…ovidername as a configurable thing. Added nameid_format into SYNOPSIS.
…XML tree inside it that has also been signed. TODO: Should remove the outermost Signature only, now it removes the first it finds in the byte stream (with a regexp). TODO: Should not need the Response namespace for matching to make XML::Sig general again.
…XML tree inside it that has also been signed. TODO: Should remove the outermost Signature only, now it removes the first it finds in the byte stream (with a regexp). TODO: Should not need the Response namespace for matching to make XML::Sig general again.
Only supported when XML::CanonicalizeXML is used.
Conflicts:
	lib/Net/SAML2/XML/Sig.pm
@chrisa
Copy link
Owner

chrisa commented Jan 13, 2012

Hi,

Sorry for the delay looking at this! I've had no chance to do any SAML work at all until just now, but I hope to get this stuff merged before too long.

I've just pushed 0.17 to CPAN with a couple of smaller fixes, and then I'll be looking at the multiple-signature stuff.

Chris.

@okko
Copy link
Author

okko commented May 25, 2012

Any possibility to get these merged? I'd like to switch back to the upstream version of yours.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants