FEAT: Add option for pep8 aliases in binding

[dipinknair]

This pull request refactors the _bind_assembly_for_explicit_interface function to make it more flexible and updates its usage in the initialize function. The refactored function now supports additional options for binding assemblies, including enabling PEP 8 aliases.

Refactoring of _bind_assembly_for_explicit_interface:

• Renamed _bind_assembly_for_explicit_interface to _bind_assembly and added two optional parameters: explicit_interface and pep8_aliases. This allows the function to handle both explicit interface implementation and PEP 8 aliasing.
• Updated the binding logic to conditionally set AllowExplicitInterfaceImplementation and Pep8Aliases based on the new parameters.

Updates to initialize function:

• Replaced the call to _bind_assembly_for_explicit_interface with _bind_assembly and passed True for both explicit_interface and pep8_aliases arguments to enable these features for the "Ansys.ACT.WB1" assembly.

---

Usage:

app = App()
app.update_globals(globals())
print(app)

# CamelCase
geometry_import = Model.GeometryImportGroup.AddGeometryImport()
# pep8 formatting
geometry_import = Model.geometry_import_group.add_geometry_import()

[koubaa]

let's make it opt-in for now, like this:

app = App(pep8=True)

until it has gone through more usage/testing.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.49%. Comparing base (6e771e6) to head (0bf6c64).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1234      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.44%   86.49%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        2537     2540       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         2193     2197       +4     
+ Misses        344      343       -1     

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.06% (target: -1.00%)	✅ 100.00%

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (6e771e6)	2537	2193	86.44%
Head commit (0bf6c64)	2540 (+3)	2197 (+4)	86.50% (+0.06%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#1234)	6	6	100.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences