Remove lodash #800
Remove lodash #800
Conversation
Remove lodash from the form builder
WalkthroughThis update systematically removes all Lodash utility function dependencies across the codebase, replacing them with native JavaScript methods or custom helper functions. Several new utility methods are introduced within components or as a shared utility module. The widget configuration is updated to remove Lodash and include the new utility library. No changes are made to the core logic or exported entity signatures. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Component
participant Utils
Note over Component,Utils: Example: Utility function usage after refactor
Component->>Utils: call sortBy(array, iteratee)
Utils-->>Component: returns sorted array
Component->>Utils: call isEqual(a, b)
Utils-->>Component: returns boolean
Component->>Utils: call uniqWith(array, comparator)
Utils-->>Component: returns unique array
sequenceDiagram
participant App
participant widget.json
participant Lodash
participant Utils
App->>widget.json: Load dependencies
widget.json--x Lodash: Lodash removed from assets
widget.json-->>Utils: js/libs/utils.js added as asset
App->>Utils: Use utility functions (e.g., sortBy, isEqual)
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
npm error Exit handler never called! ✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![cursor[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1210556?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug: `mapKeys` Utility Ignores Iteratee Return Value
The mapKeys utility function is incorrectly implemented. It calls the iteratee but ignores its return value, always returning an empty object instead of mapping object keys as intended by the original lodash method.
js/libs/form.js#L81-L89
fliplet-widget-form-builder/js/libs/form.js
Lines 81 to 89 in 91ce56b
BugBot free trial expires on July 22, 2025
You have used $0.00 of your $1.00 spend limit so far. Manage your spend limit in the Cursor dashboard.
Was this report helpful? Give feedback by reacting with 👍 or 👎
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 22
🔭 Outside diff range comments (3)
js/components/password.js (1)
126-130: Fix critical bug: Object.forEach() doesn't exist.The change from
_.forEach(this.rules, function(value))tothis.rules.forEach(function(value))is incorrect. Therulesproperty is an object, not an array, and objects don't have aforEachmethod. This will cause a runtime error.- this.rules.forEach(function(value) { - if (!value.test(password)) { - isValid = false; - } - }); + Object.values(this.rules).forEach(function(value) { + if (!value.test(password)) { + isValid = false; + } + });Alternatively, you could use
Object.keys()and iterate over the keys:- this.rules.forEach(function(value) { - if (!value.test(password)) { - isValid = false; - } - }); + Object.keys(this.rules).forEach(function(key) { + if (!this.rules[key].test(password)) { + isValid = false; + } + }.bind(this));js/components/file.js (1)
107-135: Address var usage in multiple locations.Multiple
vardeclarations should be replaced withconstto follow modern JavaScript practices and the Google JavaScript Style Guide.loadFileData: function() { - var $vm = this; - var isFileDataLoaded = false; + const $vm = this; + let isFileDataLoaded = false; // ... rest of method }).then(function(files) { - var newFiles = files.map(function(file) { + const newFiles = files.map(function(file) {js/libs/core.js (1)
224-937: Comprehensive testing plan needed for core refactoring.This extensive Lodash removal affects critical form builder functionality and requires thorough testing.
Essential test areas:
- Debounce functionality: Input handling, timing accuracy
- Object property merging: Component configuration inheritance
- Array operations: Option processing, deduplication, filtering
- Field matching: Name synchronisation, duplicate detection
- Deep cloning: Form data preservation, nested object handling
Suggested test approach:
- Unit tests for each utility replacement
- Integration tests for form field creation and configuration
- End-to-end tests for multi-step form scenarios
The scope of changes warrants extensive regression testing to ensure no functionality is broken.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
js/components/checkbox.js(4 hunks)js/components/customButton.js(1 hunks)js/components/file.js(3 hunks)js/components/image.js(1 hunks)js/components/matrix.js(8 hunks)js/components/number.js(1 hunks)js/components/password.js(1 hunks)js/components/radio.js(1 hunks)js/components/reorderList.js(3 hunks)js/components/wysiwyg.js(4 hunks)js/libs/builder.js(18 hunks)js/libs/core.js(22 hunks)js/libs/form.js(27 hunks)js/libs/templates.js(1 hunks)js/libs/utils.js(1 hunks)widget.json(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.js`: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide ...
**/*.js: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide and point out any mismatches. Ensure all code is fully documented. Suggest a testing plan to ensure code is adequately tested. Suggest unit tests. Avoid integration tests.
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
js/libs/templates.jsjs/components/number.jsjs/components/customButton.jsjs/components/password.jsjs/components/image.jsjs/components/radio.jsjs/components/reorderList.jsjs/components/checkbox.jsjs/components/matrix.jsjs/components/wysiwyg.jsjs/components/file.jsjs/libs/core.jsjs/libs/utils.jsjs/libs/builder.jsjs/libs/form.js
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
js/libs/core.js (2)
js/libs/builder.js (3)
field(1155-1155)currentMultiStepForm(1133-1133)currentMultiStepForm(1179-1179)js/libs/form.js (9)
field(298-298)currentMultiStepForm(283-283)currentMultiStepForm(900-900)currentMultiStepForm(1086-1086)currentMultiStepForm(1415-1415)currentMultiStepForm(2006-2006)currentMultiStepForm(2046-2046)currentMultiStepForm(2065-2065)currentMultiStepForm(2087-2087)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
js/components/customButton.js
[error] 33-33: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 34-34: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
js/components/radio.js
[error] 58-60: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
js/components/reorderList.js
[error] 117-117: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 119-119: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
js/components/checkbox.js
[error] 53-57: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 60-62: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 112-112: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 113-113: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 135-135: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'let' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 143-143: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 144-144: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 148-148: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 165-165: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 166-166: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 169-171: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 182-182: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 228-230: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
js/components/matrix.js
[error] 63-63: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 97-97: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 177-177: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 178-180: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 182-182: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 246-246: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 249-249: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 258-260: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 313-313: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 314-316: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
js/components/wysiwyg.js
[error] 42-42: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
[error] 74-74: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 86-86: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 87-87: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 88-92: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 125-125: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 249-249: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'let' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
js/components/file.js
[error] 97-97: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 98-98: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 108-108: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 109-109: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'let' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 128-132: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
js/libs/core.js
[error] 49-49: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 50-50: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 143-143: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 147-147: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 225-237: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 226-226: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'let' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 229-229: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 230-230: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 318-320: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 435-435: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
[error] 429-429: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 430-433: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 637-639: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 674-676: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 692-697: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 699-709: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 701-701: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 815-815: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 818-818: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 925-925: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
js/libs/utils.js
[error] 34-34: Do not access Object.prototype method 'hasOwnProperty' from target object.
It's recommended using Object.hasOwn() instead of using Object.hasOwnProperty().
See MDN web docs for more details.
(lint/suspicious/noPrototypeBuiltins)
[error] 26-26: Use Array.isArray() instead of instanceof Array.
instanceof Array returns false for array-like objects and arrays from other execution contexts.
Unsafe fix: Use Array.isArray() instead.
(lint/suspicious/useIsArray)
[error] 117-117: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
js/libs/builder.js
[error] 265-267: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 672-678: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 680-686: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 696-696: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 700-700: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 793-795: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 977-977: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'let' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 978-978: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 979-979: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 981-981: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'let' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 982-982: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 985-985: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 986-986: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 987-987: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 1024-1027: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 1254-1256: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 1282-1284: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
js/libs/form.js
[error] 134-134: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'let' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 137-137: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 138-138: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 139-142: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 143-143: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 454-454: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 513-513: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
[error] 519-519: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
[error] 538-538: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'let' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 1443-1443: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 1633-1639: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 1656-1656: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 2157-2160: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 2163-2163: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
[error] 2168-2168: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
[error] 2173-2173: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
[error] 2175-2175: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
[error] 2166-2166: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 2220-2220: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 2409-2409: Other switch clauses can erroneously access this declaration.
Wrap the declaration in a block to restrict its access to the switch clause.
The declaration is defined in this switch clause:
Unsafe fix: Wrap the declaration in a block.
(lint/correctness/noSwitchDeclarations)
[error] 2409-2409: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 2447-2447: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'let' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: Cursor BugBot
🔇 Additional comments (34)
js/libs/utils.js (2)
53-69: LGTM! Excellent debounce implementation.The debounce function correctly handles both immediate and delayed execution patterns, with proper cleanup and context preservation.
142-157: Use safer property checking method.The
hasfunction should useObject.hasOwnProperty.call()instead of accessinghasOwnPropertydirectly from the object.function has(obj, path) { if (!obj || typeof obj !== 'object') return false; const keys = path.split('.'); let current = obj; for (const key of keys) { - if (current === null || current === undefined || !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(current, key)) { + if (current === null || current === undefined || !Object.hasOwnProperty(current, key)) { return false; } current = current[key]; } return true; }Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
js/components/number.js (1)
82-82: Replacement of _.isNaN with isNaN is safe in this contextNo other occurrences of
_.isNaNwere found in the codebase. Sincevalueis the result ofparseFloat(), it will always be a number (orNaN), soisNaN(value)behaves identically to_.isNaN(value)here. You may optionally useNumber.isNaN(value)for stricter NaN-only checks, but it isn’t required to maintain correctness.widget.json (1)
35-35: Approved removal of lodash — new utils.js usage verified
- Searched for any remaining lodash references with
rg lodashandrg "_.[\w]+"across.jsfiles; no lodash imports or usage found in application code.- The only matches are internal identifiers in vendor libraries, which are unaffected by this change.
- Adding
js/libs/utils.jsto both interface and build assets and removing the lodash dependency is correct and complete.js/libs/templates.js (1)
76-78: Ignore removal of unused template helpersA scan of the entire codebase found no references to
compileTemplateorrenderTemplateoutside their commented definitions injs/libs/templates.js. Commenting them out introduces no breaking changes, so you can safely leave them removed.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
js/components/image.js (1)
317-319: Excellent lodash replacement with native method.The replacement of
_.mapwith nativeArray.prototype.mapis correct and maintains identical functionality whilst removing the lodash dependency.js/components/file.js (1)
54-60: Excellent native method replacements for lodash utilities.The replacements are correct:
Array.map()properly replaces_.mapArray.some()properly replaces_.someThese native methods provide identical functionality whilst removing lodash dependencies.
js/components/matrix.js (4)
66-76: Well-implemented kebab-case conversion helper.The toKebabCase method correctly handles camelCase to kebab-case conversion and provides appropriate documentation.
78-89: Solid isEmpty implementation with comprehensive type checking.The isEmpty method handles all the necessary edge cases (null, undefined, empty strings, arrays, and objects) with clear logic.
157-159: Excellent native JavaScript replacements for Lodash methods.The refactoring successfully replaces Lodash utilities with native equivalents:
Array.prototype.forEachinstead of_.forEachObject.keys().forEachinstead of_.forInArray.prototype.findIndexinstead of_.findIndexObject.prototype.hasOwnProperty.callinstead of_.has- Custom
isEmptymethod instead of_.isEmptyThe logic remains intact and the implementations are correct.
Also applies to: 169-196
245-265: Consistent and correct native method usage throughout.All remaining Lodash replacements follow the same pattern:
- Native
findandeverymethods- Proper use of
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call- Consistent forEach patterns
The refactoring maintains the original functionality whilst removing external dependencies.
Also applies to: 289-297, 312-321, 335-337
js/components/checkbox.js (5)
104-120: Well-implemented sortBy method with proper immutability.The sortBy implementation correctly:
- Uses
slice()to avoid mutating the original array- Implements proper comparison logic
- Handles edge cases with consistent return values
122-156: Robust deep equality implementation with comprehensive type checking.The isEqual method properly handles:
- Primitive type equality
- Null/undefined checks
- Array deep comparison with recursion
- Object deep comparison with property validation
- Proper use of
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.callThe recursive implementation is correct and will handle nested structures appropriately.
158-179: Correct uniqueWith implementation using comparator function.The method properly:
- Creates a new result array
- Uses
some()to check for duplicates- Correctly applies the comparator function with proper context
- Maintains functional programming principles
53-57: Effective usage of custom sortBy method.The sortBy method is used correctly to maintain checkbox option order based on their index positions in the options array.
Also applies to: 185-189
228-230: Proper native JavaScript replacements.Good use of native
find()method withObject.prototype.hasOwnProperty.callfor safe property checking.js/components/wysiwyg.js (4)
54-64: Clean toKebabCase implementation.The method correctly handles the conversion from various formats to kebab-case with proper regex patterns and method chaining.
66-76: Excellent getNestedProperty implementation.The method properly uses
reduce()to safely traverse nested object properties and handles missing properties gracefully.
78-95: Solid setNestedProperty implementation with object creation.The method correctly:
- Splits the path into keys
- Creates intermediate objects as needed
- Sets the final property value
- Uses proper functional programming patterns
248-257: Proper usage of native forEach and helper methods.The code correctly:
- Uses native
forEachinstead of Lodash- Applies the custom
getNestedPropertyandsetNestedPropertymethods- Maintains the original plugin configuration logic
js/libs/core.js (6)
48-68: Excellent native JavaScript replacements for category processing.The refactoring successfully replaces Lodash methods with native equivalents:
Object.keys().forEach()instead of_.forInArray.prototype.find()instead of_.findThe logic is preserved and the implementation is more performant without external dependencies.
224-237: Well-implemented custom debounce function.The debounce implementation correctly:
- Uses closure to maintain timeout state
- Handles context and arguments properly
- Clears previous timeouts appropriately
- Applies the function with correct timing
This is a solid replacement for
_.debounce.
340-400: Proper use of Object.assign for property merging.The native
Object.assign()correctly replaces_.assign()functionality whilst maintaining the original merge behaviour for component properties.Also applies to: 435-439
924-937: Effective custom debounced field matching implementation.The
_matchFieldsmethod properly:
- Uses custom debounce with appropriate delay
- Maintains context with closure
- Handles field name synchronisation correctly
- Checks for duplicate fields in multi-step forms
The refactoring preserves the original functionality whilst removing Lodash dependency.
692-709: Correct native array method usage.The code properly replaces Lodash array utilities with native methods:
Array.prototype.map()instead of_.mapArray.prototype.filter()instead of_.filterand_.compact- Proper handling of falsy value filtering
The spread operator with
Setfor deduplication is a modern, efficient approach.Also applies to: 1321-1346
870-871: Evaluate deep-cloning approach in js/libs/core.jsThe current use of
this.localSelectedFieldOptions = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(this.selectedFieldOptions)); this.localFieldOptions = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(this.fieldOptions));fails for Dates, functions, undefined values or circular references.
Consider instead:
- Use the built-in structured cloning API where available (modern browsers, Node 17+):
this.localSelectedFieldOptions = structuredClone(this.selectedFieldOptions); this.localFieldOptions = structuredClone(this.fieldOptions);- Provide a fallback or polyfill for environments without
structuredClone, or use a lightweight deep-clone utility.- Verify your target runtime support and test edge cases (e.g. circular structures, special object types).
[js/libs/core.js#L870–871]
js/libs/builder.js (4)
43-43: Well done on replacing_.compactwith nativefilter(Boolean)!This is a clean and idiomatic JavaScript replacement that maintains the same functionality.
Also applies to: 422-422
123-143: Good replacement of_.assignwithObject.assign.The native
Object.assignis the standard way to merge objects in modern JavaScript.
696-696: Excellent use of Set for array uniqueness!Using
[...new Set()]is a modern and efficient way to get unique values, replacing_.uniq.
977-992: Good conversion from lodash to native loops.The nested loop structure correctly handles the attribute processing.
Consider using more modern iteration methods:
-for (var i = 0; i < $allElements.length; i++) { - var el = $allElements[i]; +for (const el of $allElements) { var $el = $(el); - for (var j = 0; j < el.attributes.length; j++) { - var attr = el.attributes[j]; + for (const attr of el.attributes) {js/libs/form.js (4)
15-153: Good approach to replacing lodash with native JavaScript helpers!The helper functions are well-implemented and maintain compatibility with the lodash API. This keeps the codebase maintainable while removing the external dependency.
52-67: Well-implementedgetfunction for nested property access.The implementation correctly handles edge cases and follows the lodash API, including support for both string paths with dots and array paths.
451-470: Verify the usage ofmapKeyshere.Given that the
mapKeysimplementation is broken (see previous comment), this code might not be working as intended. The current usage suggests you're only iterating over the object, not transforming keys.Consider replacing with a clearer approach:
-mapKeys(Fliplet.Navigate.query, function(value, key) { +Object.entries(Fliplet.Navigate.query).forEach(function([key, value]) { if (key === field.defaultValueKey) { field.rowOptions.forEach(function(row) { var val = row.id ? row.id : row.label; if (!has(matrixValue, val)) { matrixValue[val] = value; } }); } else if (key.includes(field.defaultValueKey)) { var regex = /\[(.*)\]/g; var match = key.split(regex).filter(r => r !== ''); if (match.length > 1) { matrixValue[match[1]] = value; } else { matrixValue = value; } } });
1861-1861: Good use ofObject.values()for native object value extraction.This is the standard way to get object values in modern JavaScript, replacing lodash's
_.values.
| @@ -716,7 +721,7 @@ Fliplet().then(function() { | |||
| payload: payload | |||
| }); | |||
| } else if (!hooksDeleted) { | |||
| if (_.isEqual(columns.sort(), ds.columns.sort())) { | |||
| if (JSON.stringify(columns.sort()) === JSON.stringify(ds.columns.sort())) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider a more efficient array comparison method.
While JSON.stringify works for comparing arrays, it can be inefficient for large datasets and doesn't handle all edge cases (e.g., different object property orders).
Consider using a dedicated array comparison function:
-if (JSON.stringify(columns.sort()) === JSON.stringify(ds.columns.sort())) {
+if (columns.length === ds.columns.length && columns.sort().every((val, index) => val === ds.columns.sort()[index])) {
return; // no need to update
}Or extract to a utility function:
function arraysEqual(a, b) {
if (a.length !== b.length) return false;
const sortedA = [...a].sort();
const sortedB = [...b].sort();
return sortedA.every((val, index) => val === sortedB[index]);
}🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In js/libs/builder.js at line 724, replace the current array comparison using
JSON.stringify with a more efficient and reliable method. Implement a utility
function that first checks array lengths, sorts copies of both arrays, and then
compares elements one by one for equality. Use this function to compare the
columns arrays instead of stringifying them.
| function mapKeys(object, iteratee) { | ||
| const result = {}; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(object)) { | ||
| iteratee(value, key); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return result; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: The mapKeys function is incorrectly implemented.
The function only calls the iteratee but doesn't create a new object with mapped keys. This will break any code relying on this function.
The current implementation doesn't map keys or return a transformed object. Here's the correct implementation:
function mapKeys(object, iteratee) {
const result = {};
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(object)) {
- iteratee(value, key);
+ const newKey = iteratee(value, key);
+ result[newKey] = value;
}
return result;
}However, looking at the usage in line 451, it seems the code doesn't actually need the mapped object - it's just iterating. Consider if mapKeys is the right function here, or if a simple Object.entries().forEach() would be clearer.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function mapKeys(object, iteratee) { | |
| const result = {}; | |
| for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(object)) { | |
| iteratee(value, key); | |
| } | |
| return result; | |
| } | |
| function mapKeys(object, iteratee) { | |
| const result = {}; | |
| for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(object)) { | |
| const newKey = iteratee(value, key); | |
| result[newKey] = value; | |
| } | |
| return result; | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In js/libs/form.js around lines 81 to 89, the mapKeys function currently calls
the iteratee but does not build or return a new object with transformed keys,
which breaks its intended functionality. To fix this, modify the function to
create a new result object where each key is replaced by the value returned from
the iteratee, and return this new object. Alternatively, if the usage at line
451 only requires iteration without mapping, replace the mapKeys call with
Object.entries().forEach() for clarity and correctness.
| var timeout; | ||
|
|
||
| return function() { | ||
| var context = this; | ||
| var args = arguments; | ||
| var later = function() { | ||
| timeout = null; | ||
| if (!immediate) func.apply(context, args); | ||
| }; | ||
| var callNow = immediate && !timeout; | ||
|
|
||
| clearTimeout(timeout); | ||
| timeout = setTimeout(later, wait); | ||
| if (callNow) func.apply(context, args); | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider using let instead of var in the debounce function.
While var works here, using let would be more consistent with modern JavaScript practices.
function debounce(func, wait, immediate) {
- var timeout;
+ let timeout;
return function() {
- var context = this;
- var args = arguments;
- var later = function() {
+ const context = this;
+ const args = arguments;
+ const later = function() {
timeout = null;
if (!immediate) func.apply(context, args);
};
- var callNow = immediate && !timeout;
+ const callNow = immediate && !timeout;
clearTimeout(timeout);
timeout = setTimeout(later, wait);
if (callNow) func.apply(context, args);
};
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| var timeout; | |
| return function() { | |
| var context = this; | |
| var args = arguments; | |
| var later = function() { | |
| timeout = null; | |
| if (!immediate) func.apply(context, args); | |
| }; | |
| var callNow = immediate && !timeout; | |
| clearTimeout(timeout); | |
| timeout = setTimeout(later, wait); | |
| if (callNow) func.apply(context, args); | |
| }; | |
| } | |
| function debounce(func, wait, immediate) { | |
| let timeout; | |
| return function() { | |
| const context = this; | |
| const args = arguments; | |
| const later = function() { | |
| timeout = null; | |
| if (!immediate) func.apply(context, args); | |
| }; | |
| const callNow = immediate && !timeout; | |
| clearTimeout(timeout); | |
| timeout = setTimeout(later, wait); | |
| if (callNow) func.apply(context, args); | |
| }; | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 134-134: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'let' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 137-137: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 138-138: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 139-142: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 143-143: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In js/libs/form.js between lines 134 and 149, replace the declaration of the
variable 'timeout' from 'var' to 'let' to align with modern JavaScript practices
and improve code clarity and block scoping.
| var ordered = _.sortBy(this.value, function(val) { | ||
| return _.findIndex($vm.options, function(option) { | ||
| var ordered = this.sortBy(this.value, function(val) { | ||
| return $vm.options.findIndex(function(option) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@armine-fliplet Could you please confirm if this change will work? I assume $vm.options doesn’t have a findIndex function unless it is string or Array.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Arpanexe type of $vm.options is Array
| return (option.id || option.label) === val; | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Get all options label in array format | ||
| var allOptions = _.map(this.options, function(option) { | ||
| var allOptions = this.options.map(function(option) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@armine-fliplet Same with map function
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Arpanexe type of $vm.options is Array
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
js/libs/core.js (1)
149-170: Excellent Lodash replacements with minor style improvements needed.The replacements are correct:
Object.keys().forEach()properly replaces_.forInString.prototype.includes()correctly replaces_.includesObject.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call()is good practice for safe property checkingConsider updating variable declarations from
vartoconst:- Object.keys(Fliplet.Navigate.query).forEach(function(key) { - var value = Fliplet.Navigate.query[key]; + Object.keys(Fliplet.Navigate.query).forEach(function(key) { + const value = Fliplet.Navigate.query[key];
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
js/libs/core.js (2)
22-37: Remove duplicate JSDoc documentation.The JSDoc comment for
emitEventis duplicated. Remove the first occurrence (lines 22-27) since the function is commented out with proper explanation.
436-446: Object.assign replacement is correct, but address variable declarations.The replacement of
_.assignInwithObject.assignis correct. Update variable declarations fromvartoconst:- var baseComponent = components[componentName]; - var pickedProps = { + const baseComponent = components[componentName]; + const pickedProps = {Note: The parameter reassignment issue on line 442 was already flagged in previous reviews.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
js/libs/core.js(22 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.js`: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide ...
**/*.js: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide and point out any mismatches. Ensure all code is fully documented. Suggest a testing plan to ensure code is adequately tested. Suggest unit tests. Avoid integration tests.
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
js/libs/core.js
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
js/libs/core.js (2)
js/libs/builder.js (3)
field(1155-1155)currentMultiStepForm(1133-1133)currentMultiStepForm(1179-1179)js/libs/form.js (9)
field(298-298)currentMultiStepForm(283-283)currentMultiStepForm(900-900)currentMultiStepForm(1086-1086)currentMultiStepForm(1415-1415)currentMultiStepForm(2006-2006)currentMultiStepForm(2046-2046)currentMultiStepForm(2065-2065)currentMultiStepForm(2087-2087)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
js/libs/core.js
[error] 56-56: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 57-57: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 150-150: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 154-154: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 232-244: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 233-233: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'let' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 236-236: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 237-237: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 325-327: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 442-442: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
[error] 436-436: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 437-440: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 644-646: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 681-683: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 699-704: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 706-716: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 708-708: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 822-822: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 825-825: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 932-932: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole body of the function. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (4)
js/libs/core.js (4)
58-60: LGTM: Correct Lodash replacement.The replacement of
_.findwith nativeArray.prototype.findis correct and maintains the same functionality.
727-850: LGTM: Consistent Object.assign replacements.All
Object.assign(this.errors, {...})calls correctly replace_.assignInfunctionality. The error handling logic is preserved and the syntax is clean.
877-878: JSON cloning replacement is adequate for this use case.The
JSON.parse(JSON.stringify())replacement for_.cloneDeepworks well for basic object cloning of field options. Note that this approach has limitations (doesn't handle functions, dates, undefined, Symbol) but is sufficient for the current data structure.
1328-1353: LGTM: Clean array processing implementation.The use of native
split(),map(), andfilter()methods for processing option strings is correct and efficient. The string parsing logic properly handles both simple options and label/ID pairs.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
js/libs/utils.js (2)
115-133: Avoid parameter reassignment inassignInStatic analysis still flags
targetreassignment. Use a local variable instead to comply with Google style and maintain clarity.-function assignIn(target, ...sources) { - if (!target || typeof target !== 'object') { - target = {}; - } +function assignIn(target, ...sources) { + const result = (target && typeof target === 'object') ? target : {}; sources.forEach(source => { if (source && typeof source === 'object') { Object.keys(source).forEach(key => { if (source[key] && typeof source[key] === 'object' && !Array.isArray(source[key])) { - target[key] = assignIn(target[key] || {}, source[key]); + result[key] = assignIn(result[key] || {}, source[key]); } else { - target[key] = source[key]; + result[key] = source[key]; } }); } }); - return target; + return result; }
1-4: Extend file-level JSDoc per Google styleThe header lacks
@fileoverview, examples, and explicit author/version tags previously requested.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
js/libs/utils.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.js`: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide ...
**/*.js: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide and point out any mismatches. Ensure all code is fully documented. Suggest a testing plan to ensure code is adequately tested. Suggest unit tests. Avoid integration tests.
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
js/libs/utils.js
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
js/libs/utils.js
[error] 117-117: Reassigning a function parameter is confusing.
The parameter is declared here:
Use a local variable instead.
(lint/style/noParameterAssign)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (1)
js/libs/utils.js (1)
90-96:isEmptydoes not respect Maps, Sets, Numbers or Booleans
_.isEmpty(new Map()) → true, but this implementation returnsfalse.
Also primitives like0orfalseshould returntrueaccording to Lodash. Please align or update documentation.
| function debounce(func, wait, immediate) { | ||
| let timeout; | ||
|
|
||
| return function executedFunction(...args) { | ||
| const later = () => { | ||
| timeout = null; | ||
| if (!immediate) func.apply(this, args); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| const callNow = immediate && !timeout; | ||
|
|
||
| clearTimeout(timeout); | ||
| timeout = setTimeout(later, wait); | ||
|
|
||
| if (callNow) func.apply(this, args); | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
debounce leaks this & arguments context
Inside the returned arrow (later) this is lexically bound to the outer scope, not to the original call site, which breaks the common Lodash contract. Use a normal function and forward both this and args explicitly.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In js/libs/utils.js around lines 53 to 69, the debounce function uses an arrow
function for 'later', causing 'this' to be lexically bound and not preserving
the original call context. Replace the arrow function 'later' with a normal
function expression and explicitly forward 'this' and 'args' to 'func.apply' to
correctly preserve the calling context and arguments.
| function uniqWith(array, comparator) { | ||
| const result = []; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const item of array) { | ||
| if (!result.some(existing => comparator(existing, item))) { | ||
| result.push(item); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return result; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
uniqWith is O(n²); warn for large inputs
For large arrays this quadratic scan may be a bottleneck. Consider hashing comparator keys or using a Set when comparator is equality.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In js/libs/utils.js around lines 176 to 186, the uniqWith function has O(n²)
complexity due to nested iteration with the comparator. To fix this, optimize
for large inputs by checking if the comparator is simple equality and, if so,
use a Set to track seen items for O(n) performance. Otherwise, consider hashing
keys derived from the comparator to reduce redundant comparisons and improve
efficiency.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
js/libs/utils.js (3)
194-204: Performance concern: O(n²) complexity for large arrays.The
uniqWithfunction has quadratic time complexity due to the nested iteration. For large arrays, this could become a performance bottleneck.Consider optimising for large inputs by checking if the comparator is simple equality and using a Set for O(n) performance, or implement a more efficient algorithm for custom comparators.
278-293: Avoid global namespace pollution.The code blindly overwrites
window.FlipletUtilswithout checking if it already exists, which could clobber existing utilities.// Make utilities available globally for browser usage if (typeof window !== 'undefined') { - window.FlipletUtils = { + window.FlipletUtils = Object.assign(window.FlipletUtils || {}, { cloneDeep, debounce, kebabCase, isEmpty, compact, assignIn, has, uniq, uniqWith, sortBy, isEqual - }; + }); }
1-4: Enhance file-level documentation.The current documentation is basic. Consider adding more comprehensive JSDoc comments following the Google JavaScript style guide.
/** * Utility functions to replace lodash dependencies * These functions provide native JavaScript alternatives to commonly used lodash methods + * + * @fileoverview Native JavaScript utility functions replacing Lodash dependencies + * @version 1.0.0 + * @author Fliplet */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
js/libs/utils.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.js`: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide ...
**/*.js: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide and point out any mismatches. Ensure all code is fully documented. Suggest a testing plan to ensure code is adequately tested. Suggest unit tests. Avoid integration tests.
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
js/libs/utils.js
🪛 GitHub Check: Linting
js/libs/utils.js
[failure] 47-47:
Expected blank line before this statement
[failure] 42-42:
Do not nest ternary expressions
[failure] 38-38:
Expected blank line before this statement
[failure] 37-37:
Expected blank line before this statement
[failure] 6-6:
Missing JSDoc for parameter 'cache'
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run ESLint on Pull Requests
js/libs/utils.js
[error] 6-6: ESLint: Missing JSDoc for parameter 'cache' (valid-jsdoc)
| // Export utilities for use in other files | ||
| if (typeof module !== 'undefined' && module.exports) { | ||
| module.exports = { | ||
| cloneDeep, | ||
| debounce, | ||
| kebabCase, | ||
| isEmpty, | ||
| compact, | ||
| assignIn, | ||
| has, | ||
| uniq, | ||
| uniqWith, | ||
| sortBy, | ||
| isEqual | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Make utilities available globally for browser usage | ||
| if (typeof window !== 'undefined') { | ||
| window.FlipletUtils = { | ||
| cloneDeep, | ||
| debounce, | ||
| kebabCase, | ||
| isEmpty, | ||
| compact, | ||
| assignIn, | ||
| has, | ||
| uniq, | ||
| uniqWith, | ||
| sortBy, | ||
| isEqual | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Suggest comprehensive unit testing plan.
This utility library requires thorough testing to ensure compatibility with lodash replacements. Consider implementing unit tests covering:
- Edge cases for each function (null, undefined, empty values)
- Circular reference handling in
cloneDeep - Performance testing for
uniqWithwith large datasets - Cross-browser compatibility testing
- Type validation and error handling
Would you like me to generate a comprehensive test suite for these utilities?
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In js/libs/utils.js around lines 261 to 293, the utility functions are exported
for both Node.js and browser environments but lack comprehensive unit tests. To
fix this, create a detailed test suite that covers edge cases such as null,
undefined, and empty inputs for each function, tests cloneDeep's handling of
circular references, evaluates uniqWith's performance on large datasets,
verifies cross-browser compatibility, and checks type validation and error
handling to ensure robustness and compatibility with lodash replacements.
| function has(obj, path) { | ||
| if (!obj || typeof obj !== 'object') return false; | ||
|
|
||
| const keys = path.split('.'); | ||
| let current = obj; | ||
|
|
||
| for (const key of keys) { | ||
| if (current === null || current === undefined || !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(current, key)) { | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| current = current[key]; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return true; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add input validation for the path parameter.
The function assumes path is a string but doesn't validate this assumption, which could lead to runtime errors.
function has(obj, path) {
if (!obj || typeof obj !== 'object') return false;
+ if (typeof path !== 'string') return false;
const keys = path.split('.');📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function has(obj, path) { | |
| if (!obj || typeof obj !== 'object') return false; | |
| const keys = path.split('.'); | |
| let current = obj; | |
| for (const key of keys) { | |
| if (current === null || current === undefined || !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(current, key)) { | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| current = current[key]; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } | |
| function has(obj, path) { | |
| if (!obj || typeof obj !== 'object') return false; | |
| if (typeof path !== 'string') return false; | |
| const keys = path.split('.'); | |
| let current = obj; | |
| for (const key of keys) { | |
| if (current === null || current === undefined || !Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(current, key)) { | |
| return false; | |
| } | |
| current = current[key]; | |
| } | |
| return true; | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In js/libs/utils.js around lines 160 to 175, the has function assumes the path
parameter is a string but does not validate it, which can cause runtime errors
if a non-string is passed. Add input validation at the start of the function to
check if path is a string; if not, return false immediately to prevent errors
from calling split on a non-string.
| * @param {*} obj - Object to clone | ||
| * @returns {*} Cloned object | ||
| */ | ||
| function cloneDeep(obj, cache = new WeakMap()) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing JSDoc parameter documentation.
The cache parameter is missing from the JSDoc documentation, which is causing linting failures.
/**
* Deep clone an object using structuredClone or JSON fallback
* Replacement for _.cloneDeep()
* @param {*} obj - Object to clone
+ * @param {WeakMap} cache - Internal cache for circular reference tracking
* @returns {*} Cloned object
*/📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function cloneDeep(obj, cache = new WeakMap()) { | |
| /** | |
| * Deep clone an object using structuredClone or JSON fallback | |
| * Replacement for _.cloneDeep() | |
| * @param {*} obj - Object to clone | |
| * @param {WeakMap} cache - Internal cache for circular reference tracking | |
| * @returns {*} Cloned object | |
| */ | |
| function cloneDeep(obj, cache = new WeakMap()) { | |
| // …rest of implementation… | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In js/libs/utils.js at line 12, the JSDoc comment for the cloneDeep function is
missing documentation for the cache parameter. Add a @param tag for cache in the
JSDoc block, describing it as a WeakMap used to cache objects during cloning to
handle circular references. This will resolve the linting failure related to
missing parameter documentation.
| function sortBy(array, iteratee) { | ||
| const getValue = typeof iteratee === 'function' | ||
| ? iteratee | ||
| : item => item[iteratee]; | ||
|
|
||
| return [...array].sort((a, b) => { | ||
| const aVal = getValue(a); | ||
| const bVal = getValue(b); | ||
|
|
||
| if (aVal < bVal) return -1; | ||
| if (aVal > bVal) return 1; | ||
|
|
||
| return 0; | ||
| }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider handling edge cases in sortBy function.
The function doesn't handle cases where the iteratee function might return undefined or null values, which could lead to unexpected sorting behaviour.
return [...array].sort((a, b) => {
const aVal = getValue(a);
const bVal = getValue(b);
+
+ // Handle undefined/null values
+ if (aVal == null && bVal == null) return 0;
+ if (aVal == null) return 1;
+ if (bVal == null) return -1;
if (aVal < bVal) return -1;
if (aVal > bVal) return 1;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| function sortBy(array, iteratee) { | |
| const getValue = typeof iteratee === 'function' | |
| ? iteratee | |
| : item => item[iteratee]; | |
| return [...array].sort((a, b) => { | |
| const aVal = getValue(a); | |
| const bVal = getValue(b); | |
| if (aVal < bVal) return -1; | |
| if (aVal > bVal) return 1; | |
| return 0; | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| function sortBy(array, iteratee) { | |
| const getValue = typeof iteratee === 'function' | |
| ? iteratee | |
| : item => item[iteratee]; | |
| return [...array].sort((a, b) => { | |
| const aVal = getValue(a); | |
| const bVal = getValue(b); | |
| // Handle undefined/null values | |
| if (aVal == null && bVal == null) return 0; | |
| if (aVal == null) return 1; | |
| if (bVal == null) return -1; | |
| if (aVal < bVal) return -1; | |
| if (aVal > bVal) return 1; | |
| return 0; | |
| }); | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In js/libs/utils.js around lines 213 to 227, the sortBy function does not handle
cases where the iteratee returns undefined or null, which can cause unexpected
sorting results. Update the comparison logic to explicitly check for undefined
or null values for aVal and bVal, and define a consistent ordering for these
cases (e.g., treat undefined/null as greater or lesser than any valid value).
This will ensure the sort behaves predictably even when some items have missing
or null properties.
| cache.set(obj, result); | ||
| return result; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Fix formatting issues for better readability.
Static analysis indicates missing blank lines before these statements, which improves code readability.
if (Array.isArray(obj)) {
const result = obj.map(item => cloneDeep(item, cache));
+
cache.set(obj, result);
+
return result;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| cache.set(obj, result); | |
| return result; | |
| if (Array.isArray(obj)) { | |
| const result = obj.map(item => cloneDeep(item, cache)); | |
| cache.set(obj, result); | |
| return result; | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Linting
[failure] 38-38:
Expected blank line before this statement
[failure] 37-37:
Expected blank line before this statement
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In js/libs/utils.js around lines 37 to 38, add a blank line before the
statements "cache.set(obj, result);" and "return result;" to improve code
readability and adhere to formatting standards.
| const cloned = obj instanceof Map | ||
| ? new Map() | ||
| : obj instanceof Set | ||
| ? new Set() | ||
| : {}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Simplify nested ternary expressions for better readability.
The nested ternary operators make the code harder to read and are flagged by static analysis.
if (typeof obj === 'object') {
- const cloned = obj instanceof Map
- ? new Map()
- : obj instanceof Set
- ? new Set()
- : {};
+ let cloned;
+ if (obj instanceof Map) {
+ cloned = new Map();
+ } else if (obj instanceof Set) {
+ cloned = new Set();
+ } else {
+ cloned = {};
+ }
cache.set(obj, cloned);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const cloned = obj instanceof Map | |
| ? new Map() | |
| : obj instanceof Set | |
| ? new Set() | |
| : {}; | |
| if (typeof obj === 'object') { | |
| let cloned; | |
| if (obj instanceof Map) { | |
| cloned = new Map(); | |
| } else if (obj instanceof Set) { | |
| cloned = new Set(); | |
| } else { | |
| cloned = {}; | |
| } | |
| cache.set(obj, cloned); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Linting
[failure] 42-42:
Do not nest ternary expressions
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In js/libs/utils.js around lines 42 to 46, the nested ternary expression used to
initialize the cloned variable reduces code readability. Refactor this by
replacing the nested ternary with a clearer if-else or switch statement that
explicitly checks if obj is an instance of Map or Set and assigns the
appropriate new instance, otherwise defaults to an empty object. This will
improve readability and satisfy static analysis checks.
| : obj instanceof Set | ||
| ? new Set() | ||
| : {}; | ||
| cache.set(obj, cloned); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add blank line before statement for consistency.
Static analysis indicates a missing blank line before this statement.
cache.set(obj, cloned);
+
for (const key in obj) {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| cache.set(obj, cloned); | |
| cache.set(obj, cloned); | |
| for (const key in obj) { |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Linting
[failure] 47-47:
Expected blank line before this statement
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In js/libs/utils.js at line 47, add a blank line before the statement
"cache.set(obj, cloned);" to maintain consistent code formatting and satisfy
static analysis requirements.
Remove lodash from the form builder
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Chores