Add comprehensive JSDoc and template documentation #799
Conversation
- Add JSDoc headers to all Vue components in js/components/ - Add JSDoc header to password configuration component - Add template comments to 12 complex Handlebars templates - Update README.md to include documentation step in field creation process - Improve code maintainability and AI agent comprehension 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@armine-fliplet has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
WalkthroughThe changes consist of extensive documentation improvements and minor code enhancements. The README.md was rewritten to provide a comprehensive developer guide. All form field component files, configuration files, and Handlebars templates received descriptive file-level comments explaining their purpose and features. Several utility files gained JSDoc comments, and some new internal utility functions were introduced for template handling and event emission, without altering any existing logic or interfaces. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant README.md
participant ComponentJS
participant TemplateHBS
participant UtilityJS
Developer->>README.md: Reads comprehensive setup and contribution guide
Developer->>ComponentJS: Reviews JSDoc comments for component details
Developer->>TemplateHBS: Reads template purpose in comment
Developer->>UtilityJS: Reviews JSDoc and new utility function docs
sequenceDiagram
participant UtilityJS
participant Handlebars
participant TemplateStore
UtilityJS->>TemplateStore: compileTemplate(name)
TemplateStore-->>UtilityJS: Returns compiled template function
UtilityJS->>Handlebars: renderTemplate(name, context)
Handlebars-->>UtilityJS: Returns rendered HTML string
sequenceDiagram
participant UtilityJS
participant EventHub
UtilityJS->>EventHub: emitEvent(eventName, data)
EventHub-->>UtilityJS: Event emitted to listeners
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 46
🔭 Outside diff range comments (10)
js/components/slider.js (1)
18-20:valueprop should beNumber, notString
Fliplet.UI.RangeSlideroperates on numbers and you later compare the prop with numeric values (this.slider.get()etc.). Keeping it asStringintroduces an unnecessary implicit cast and can break validation.- value: { - type: String - }, + value: { + type: Number + },js/components/title.js (1)
10-11: Declare a proper prop definition forlabelSetting
label: undefinedbypasses Vue’s prop validation and may emit a console warning. Consider:- label: undefined, + label: { + type: String, + default: undefined + },js/components/image.js (1)
64-68:datashould be a factory functionUsing an object literal will share state across component instances. Vue guidelines require a function that returns the object.
- data: { - boundingRect: undefined, - cameraSource: undefined, - forcedClick: false - }, + data: function () { + return { + boundingRect: undefined, + cameraSource: undefined, + forcedClick: false + }; + },js/components/geolocation.js (2)
91-99:thisinside promise callback refers towindow, breaking timeout logicInside
location.then(function(result) { … })thefunctionshadowes Vue instance context.this.timeOuttherefore creates a global. Use$vm.- this.timeOut = setTimeout(function() { + $vm.timeOut = setTimeout(function() {
115-124: Same context bug inupdateLocation
clearTimeout(this.timeOut);and subsequentthis.timeOut = …need to reference$vm.- clearTimeout(this.timeOut); + clearTimeout($vm.timeOut); - this.timeOut = setTimeout(function() { + $vm.timeOut = setTimeout(function() {js/components/matrix.js (1)
282-285: Incorrect comparisoncol.id === colbreaks validation
checkInvalidValue()mistakenly comparescol.idwithcol, not thekeybeing iterated, so the function always returnsfalsewhen IDs are used.- if (col.label === key || col.id === col) { + if (col.label === key || col.id === key) {js/components/file.js (1)
52-60:selectedFileNamedeclared as both prop and computed – Vue will warnA computed property shadows the prop with the same name causing unexpected behaviour. Rename one or remove the prop.
-props: { - ... - selectedFileName: { - type: String, - default: '' - }, - ... -}, -computed: { - selectedFileName: function() { - return _.map(this.value, 'name').join(', '); - }, +props: { + ... + /* renamed to avoid clash */ + initialSelectedFileName: { + type: String, + default: '' + }, + ... +}, +computed: { + selectedFileName: function() { + return _.map(this.value, 'name').join(', '); + },js/components/address.js (1)
78-80: Fix typo in prop namechoosenAddress
choosenAddress(lines 78-80) should be speltchosenAddressfor clarity and consistency.- choosenAddress: { + chosenAddress: {Renaming will require updating references elsewhere in this file.
js/libs/builder.js (2)
146-146: Suggest adding unit tests for critical functions.The file contains complex form building logic that would benefit from unit testing, particularly for functions like
generateFormDefaults,onFieldClick, and validation logic.Would you like me to generate a unit testing plan for the key functions in this file? The testing should focus on:
- Form field manipulation logic
- Data source integration
- Template rendering
- Email configuration workflows
1105-1105: Use your logging utility instead of console.errorPlease replace the direct console statement in production code with the project’s logging mechanism. For example:
• File: js/libs/builder.js, line 1105
– Current:
js console.error('Error processing widget:', widget.id, error);
– Suggested:
js import logger from '../logger'; logger.error(`Error processing widget: ${widget.id}`, error);This removes the pipeline failure and ensures errors are captured by your centralized log system.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (52)
README.md(1 hunks)js/components/address.js(1 hunks)js/components/buttons.js(1 hunks)js/components/checkbox.js(1 hunks)js/components/codeScanner.js(1 hunks)js/components/customButton.js(1 hunks)js/components/date.js(1 hunks)js/components/dateRange.js(1 hunks)js/components/email.js(1 hunks)js/components/file.js(1 hunks)js/components/geolocation.js(1 hunks)js/components/horizontalRule.js(1 hunks)js/components/image.js(1 hunks)js/components/input.js(1 hunks)js/components/map.js(1 hunks)js/components/matrix.js(1 hunks)js/components/number.js(1 hunks)js/components/paragraph.js(1 hunks)js/components/password.js(1 hunks)js/components/radio.js(1 hunks)js/components/reorderList.js(1 hunks)js/components/select.js(1 hunks)js/components/signature.js(1 hunks)js/components/slider.js(1 hunks)js/components/starRating.js(1 hunks)js/components/telephone.js(1 hunks)js/components/textarea.js(1 hunks)js/components/time.js(1 hunks)js/components/timeRange.js(1 hunks)js/components/timeStamp.js(1 hunks)js/components/timer.js(1 hunks)js/components/title.js(1 hunks)js/components/typeahead.js(1 hunks)js/components/url.js(1 hunks)js/components/wysiwyg.js(1 hunks)js/configurations/password.js(1 hunks)js/libs/builder.js(2 hunks)js/libs/core.js(2 hunks)js/libs/form.js(1 hunks)js/libs/templates.js(2 hunks)templates/components/address.build.hbs(1 hunks)templates/components/dateRange.build.hbs(1 hunks)templates/components/file.build.hbs(1 hunks)templates/components/geolocation.build.hbs(1 hunks)templates/components/image.build.hbs(1 hunks)templates/components/map.build.hbs(1 hunks)templates/components/matrix.build.hbs(1 hunks)templates/components/reorderList.build.hbs(1 hunks)templates/components/select.build.hbs(1 hunks)templates/components/signature.build.hbs(1 hunks)templates/components/timeRange.build.hbs(1 hunks)templates/components/typeahead.build.hbs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.js`: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide ...
**/*.js: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide and point out any mismatches. Ensure all code is fully documented. Suggest a testing plan to ensure code is adequately tested. Suggest unit tests. Avoid integration tests.
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
js/components/buttons.jsjs/components/timeRange.jsjs/components/starRating.jsjs/components/telephone.jsjs/components/signature.jsjs/components/time.jsjs/components/email.jsjs/components/matrix.jsjs/components/input.jsjs/components/slider.jsjs/components/number.jsjs/components/url.jsjs/components/file.jsjs/configurations/password.jsjs/components/wysiwyg.jsjs/components/reorderList.jsjs/components/title.jsjs/components/radio.jsjs/components/date.jsjs/components/textarea.jsjs/components/checkbox.jsjs/components/map.jsjs/components/timer.jsjs/components/dateRange.jsjs/components/address.jsjs/components/geolocation.jsjs/components/timeStamp.jsjs/components/typeahead.jsjs/components/image.jsjs/components/select.jsjs/components/customButton.jsjs/components/password.jsjs/libs/form.jsjs/components/codeScanner.jsjs/components/horizontalRule.jsjs/components/paragraph.jsjs/libs/builder.jsjs/libs/core.jsjs/libs/templates.js
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
js/libs/builder.js (2)
js/libs/core.js (2)
parents(1114-1114)formSlideParent(489-491)js/libs/form.js (1)
formSlideParent(195-197)
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~87-~87: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...he CLI mounts the repo and bypasses CDN cache so you can edit files live. --- ## Te...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
README.md
5-5: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
13-13: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
14-14: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
15-15: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
21-21: Inline HTML
Element: br
(MD033, no-inline-html)
22-22: Inline HTML
Element: br
(MD033, no-inline-html)
23-23: Inline HTML
Element: br
(MD033, no-inline-html)
24-24: Inline HTML
Element: br
(MD033, no-inline-html)
120-120: Inline HTML
Element: br
(MD033, no-inline-html)
120-120: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
121-121: Inline HTML
Element: br
(MD033, no-inline-html)
121-121: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
122-122: Bare URL used
(MD034, no-bare-urls)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
js/libs/builder.js
[error] 11-11: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole module. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 11-11: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.
ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.
(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)
[error] 12-12: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole module. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 13-13: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole module. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 14-14: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole module. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'let' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run ESLint on Pull Requests
js/libs/builder.js
[warning] 1105-1105: ESLint: Unexpected console statement (no-console)
js/libs/core.js
[error] 22-22: ESLint: Missing JSDoc @returns for function (valid-jsdoc)
🪛 GitHub Check: Linting
js/libs/core.js
[failure] 27-27:
'emitEvent' is defined but never used
[failure] 22-22:
Missing JSDoc @returns for function
js/libs/templates.js
[failure] 86-86:
'renderTemplate' is defined but never used
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
- GitHub Check: Cursor BugBot
🔇 Additional comments (13)
templates/components/reorderList.build.hbs (1)
1-1: Excellent documentation addition.The comment clearly describes the component's purpose and key functionality. This enhances template clarity without affecting functionality.
templates/components/timeRange.build.hbs (1)
1-1: Good documentation enhancement.The comment effectively describes the time range field functionality. This improves template documentation consistency across the codebase.
templates/components/dateRange.build.hbs (1)
1-1: Well-crafted template documentation.The comment comprehensively describes both predefined ranges and custom date selection features, providing clear context for developers.
templates/components/file.build.hbs (1)
1-1: Comprehensive component description.The comment accurately captures all major file upload features, enhancing template documentation quality.
js/libs/core.js (1)
1-8: Excellent JSDoc header documentation.The file-level documentation clearly describes the module's purpose and functionality. This significantly improves code maintainability and aligns perfectly with the PR objectives.
templates/components/address.build.hbs (1)
1-1: Comment addition looks goodThe descriptive Handlebars comment is succinct and follows the correct
{{! … }}syntax.templates/components/typeahead.build.hbs (1)
1-1: Clear template description addedThe introductory comment improves maintainability and follows the correct Handlebars comment syntax.
templates/components/geolocation.build.hbs (1)
1-1: Documentation addition acknowledgedComment is precise and aids future maintainers without affecting render output.
js/libs/builder.js (3)
1-8: Excellent comprehensive file documentation.The JSDoc header provides clear context about the file's purpose and scope. This aligns well with the PR's documentation objectives.
17-31: Well-documented parent widget variables.The JSDoc comments clearly explain the purpose of these variables and their expected types. The logic for finding parent widgets is consistent with patterns used elsewhere in the codebase.
40-43: Clear documentation for cleanup logic.The comment effectively explains the purpose of the
_.compact()operation on the fields array.js/libs/templates.js (1)
1-7: Clear and concise file documentation.The JSDoc header appropriately describes the file's purpose as template helpers for Handlebars integration.
README.md (1)
1-129: Outstanding comprehensive developer documentation.This README transformation provides excellent guidance for developers, covering:
- Clear separation between end-user and developer docs
- Technology stack overview
- Repository structure explanation
- Step-by-step field creation workflow
- Local development instructions
- Troubleshooting guidance
The documentation significantly improves the developer experience and aligns perfectly with the PR's objectives.
|
@armine-fliplet I know we tried to document this component before but I think this PR is far better. Can you please review coderabbit's suggestions and let me know if you think I should apply any? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
js/components/address.js (1)
1-15: Consider adding usage example to complete the JSDoc documentation.The JSDoc documentation is comprehensive and well-structured. However, the previous review suggestion included adding an
@examplesection which would enhance the documentation further for developers using this component.Consider adding an example section to complete the JSDoc documentation:
* @prop {Object} selectedFieldOptions Mapping of address parts → field names + * @example + * <address-field :manualInput="false" :countryRestrictions="['GB']" /> */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
js/components/address.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.js`: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide ...
**/*.js: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide and point out any mismatches. Ensure all code is fully documented. Suggest a testing plan to ensure code is adequately tested. Suggest unit tests. Avoid integration tests.
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
js/components/address.js
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
js/components/address.js
[notice] 1-1: js/components/address.js#L1
Expected indentation of 0 spaces but found 1.
🪛 GitHub Check: Linting
js/components/address.js
[failure] 1-1:
Expected indentation of 0 spaces but found 1
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run ESLint on Pull Requests
js/components/address.js
[error] 1-1: ESLint: Expected indentation of 0 spaces but found 1 (indent)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (1)
js/components/address.js (1)
16-400: Component implementation looks solid.The address component implementation follows good practices with proper prop definitions, lifecycle management, and event handling. The Google Places API integration and address component extraction logic is well-structured.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
js/components/buttons.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.js`: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide ...
**/*.js: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide and point out any mismatches. Ensure all code is fully documented. Suggest a testing plan to ensure code is adequately tested. Suggest unit tests. Avoid integration tests.
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
js/components/buttons.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
js/components/buttons.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.js`: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide ...
**/*.js: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide and point out any mismatches. Ensure all code is fully documented. Suggest a testing plan to ensure code is adequately tested. Suggest unit tests. Avoid integration tests.
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
js/components/buttons.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (27)
js/components/matrix.js (1)
282-286: Logic bug: wrong variable referenced in comparison
col.id === colcompares the property to the object itself, guaranteeingfalseand silently skipping valid matches. Should compare againstkey.- if (col.label === key || col.id === col) { + if (col.label === key || col.id === key) {This affects
checkInvalidValue, causing legitimate column IDs to be treated as invalid and cleared. Unit tests covering mixedid/labelvalues would catch this.js/components/password.js (3)
121-137: Improve password generation method to avoid potential stack overflowThe recursive approach in
generateRandomPasswordcould potentially cause stack overflow if the random generation consistently fails validation. Consider using an iterative approach with a maximum attempt limit.generateRandomPassword: function(length) { var alphabet = 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz!#$%&*-ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOP1234567890'; - var password = ''; - var isValid = true; + var maxAttempts = 100; + var attempts = 0; - for (var x = 0; x < length; x++) { - password += alphabet.charAt(Math.floor(Math.random() * alphabet.length)); - } + while (attempts < maxAttempts) { + var password = ''; + var isValid = true; + + for (var x = 0; x < length; x++) { + password += alphabet.charAt(Math.floor(Math.random() * alphabet.length)); + } - _.forEach(this.rules, function(value) { - if (!value.test(password)) { - isValid = false; - } - }); + _.forEach(this.rules, function(value) { + if (!value.test(password)) { + isValid = false; + } + }); - return isValid ? password : this.generateRandomPassword(length); + if (isValid) { + return password; + } + + attempts++; + } + + // Fallback: return a password even if it doesn't meet all rules + return password; }
9-159: Suggest comprehensive unit testing strategyThe component handles sensitive password functionality and should have thorough unit tests covering validation rules, password generation, confirmation logic, and edge cases.
Consider implementing unit tests for:
- Password validation rules - Test each validation rule (uppercase, lowercase, number, special characters, minimum length)
- Password generation - Test auto-generation with various lengths and ensure generated passwords meet validation criteria
- Password confirmation - Test confirmation field validation and error states
- Component lifecycle - Test mounted hook behaviour with autogenerate enabled/disabled
- Edge cases - Test empty values, invalid inputs, and boundary conditions
- Props behaviour - Test different prop combinations (hash, autogenerate, confirm, etc.)
Example test structure:
describe('Password Component', function() { describe('Password Validation', function() { it('should validate uppercase requirement', function() { // Test validation logic }); it('should validate minimum length', function() { // Test length validation }); }); describe('Password Generation', function() { it('should generate password with correct length', function() { // Test generation logic }); it('should generate password meeting all validation rules', function() { // Test generated password validation }); }); });
70-75: Consider extracting password validation rules as constantsThe validation rules are defined inline within the data function. Consider extracting them as constants for better maintainability and reusability.
+var PASSWORD_VALIDATION_RULES = { + isUppercase: new RegExp('[A-Z]'), + isLowercase: new RegExp('[a-z]'), + isNumber: new RegExp('[0-9]'), + isSpecial: new RegExp('[^A-Za-z0-9]') +}; + Fliplet.FormBuilder.field('password', { name: 'Password input', category: 'Text inputs', // ... props data: function() { return { isFocused: false, passwordMinLength: 8, defaultClass: 'panel-default', invalidClass: 'panel-danger', - rules: { - isUppercase: new RegExp('[A-Z]'), - isLowercase: new RegExp('[a-z]'), - isNumber: new RegExp('[0-9]'), - isSpecial: new RegExp('[^A-Za-z0-9]') - } + rules: PASSWORD_VALIDATION_RULES }; },js/components/radio.js (3)
45-61: Add JSDoc documentation for methodsThe component methods lack proper documentation. Following Google style guide requirements, all public methods should be documented.
Add JSDoc documentation for the methods:
+ /** + * Handles click events on radio options and updates the selected value. + * @param {Object} option - The selected option object with label and optional id. + */ clickHandler: function(option) { this.value = option.id || option.label; this.updateValue(); }, + /** + * Handles focus navigation between radio options using keyboard. + * @param {number} index - The target index for focus, with wraparound support. + */ focusHandler: function(index) { var newIndex = index; if (index > this.options.length - 1) { newIndex = 0; } else if (index < 0) { newIndex = this.options.length - 1; } this.$refs.radioButton[newIndex].focus(); this.clickHandler(this.options[newIndex]); }
63-71: Improve code clarity and add documentationThe
createdlifecycle method contains complex logic that could benefit from documentation and slight refactoring for better readability.Apply this diff to improve clarity:
+ /** + * Initialises the component by validating the current value against available options. + * Clears the value if it doesn't match any option. + */ created: function() { var $vm = this; var selectedOption = _.find($vm.options, function(option) { - return (_.has(option, 'label') && _.has(option, 'id')) ? option.id === $vm.value : option.label === $vm.value; + return (_.has(option, 'label') && _.has(option, 'id')) + ? option.id === $vm.value + : option.label === $vm.value; }); this.value = selectedOption ? this.value : ''; }
13-72: Suggest comprehensive testing planThe component would benefit from unit tests to ensure reliability. Consider implementing tests for:
- Option selection and value updates
- Keyboard navigation functionality
- Validation rules (required field behaviour)
- Edge cases (empty options, invalid initial values)
- Read-only state handling
Here's a suggested unit test structure:
describe('Radio Field Component', function() { describe('Option Selection', function() { it('should update value when option is clicked'); it('should handle options with both id and label'); it('should fall back to label when id is missing'); }); describe('Keyboard Navigation', function() { it('should wrap to first option when navigating past last'); it('should wrap to last option when navigating before first'); it('should focus correct option and update value'); }); describe('Validation', function() { it('should require value when field is required'); it('should not validate when field is readonly'); }); describe('Initialisation', function() { it('should clear invalid initial values'); it('should preserve valid initial values'); }); });js/components/horizontalRule.js (1)
4-19: Suggest unit testing plan for the horizontalRule component.The component should be adequately tested to ensure its props and behaviour work correctly.
Suggested unit tests:
- Test component registration with correct name and category
- Test default prop values (showLabel: false, canHide: false)
- Test that submit is set to false
- Test that label prop can be undefined
- Test boolean prop validation for showLabel and canHide
- Test component rendering with different prop combinations
// Example unit test structure describe('horizontalRule component', () => { test('should register with correct configuration', () => { const component = Fliplet.FormBuilder.getField('horizontalRule'); expect(component.name).toBe('Line break'); expect(component.category).toBe('Formatting'); expect(component.submit).toBe(false); }); test('should have correct default prop values', () => { const component = Fliplet.FormBuilder.getField('horizontalRule'); expect(component.props.showLabel.default).toBe(false); expect(component.props.canHide.default).toBe(false); }); });js/components/file.js (11)
89-118: Add JSDoc documentation forloadFileDatamethodThis method handles complex file data loading logic and should be documented.
+ /** + * Loads file data from media API for file URLs that contain file IDs. + * Skips loading if file data is already present. + * @private + */ loadFileData: function() {
119-121: Add JSDoc documentation forshowLocalDateFormatmethodDocument this utility method for date formatting.
+ /** + * Formats a date using local date format. + * @param {Date|string} date - The date to format + * @return {string} Formatted date string + */ showLocalDateFormat: function(date) {
122-124: Add JSDoc documentation foronFileItemClickmethodDocument this event handler method.
+ /** + * Handles file item click events by navigating to the file URL. + * @param {string} url - The file URL to navigate to + */ onFileItemClick: function(url) {
125-129: Add JSDoc documentation forisFileImagemethodDocument this utility method for image type detection.
+ /** + * Checks if a file is an image based on its MIME type. + * @param {File} file - The file to check + * @return {boolean} True if file is an image, false otherwise + */ isFileImage: function(file) {
156-163: Add JSDoc documentation foronResetmethodDocument this event handler method.
+ /** + * Handles form reset events by clearing file values. + * @private + */ onReset: function() {
164-172: Add JSDoc documentation forvalidateValuemethodDocument this validation method.
+ /** + * Validates and normalises the value property to ensure it's an array. + * Converts strings to single-element arrays and non-arrays to empty arrays. + * @private + */ validateValue: function() {
173-191: Add JSDoc documentation forprocessImagemethodDocument this complex image processing method.
+ /** + * Processes an image file by parsing metadata and applying transformations. + * Optionally adds the processed image to the value array. + * @param {File} file - The image file to process + * @param {boolean} isAddElem - Whether to add the processed image to value array + * @private + */ processImage: function(file, isAddElem) {
192-209: Add JSDoc documentation forremoveFilemethodDocument this file removal method.
+ /** + * Removes a file from the value array by index and re-processes remaining images. + * @param {number} index - The index of the file to remove + */ removeFile: function(index) {
210-228: Add JSDoc documentation forupdateValuemethodDocument this file upload handling method.
+ /** + * Handles file input change events by processing selected files. + * Images are processed through processImage, other files are added directly. + * @param {Event} e - The change event from file input + */ updateValue: function(e) {
229-231: Add JSDoc documentation foropenFileDialogmethodDocument this utility method.
+ /** + * Opens the file selection dialog by triggering a click on the file input. + */ openFileDialog: function() {
7-233: Implement comprehensive unit testing strategyThe file upload component requires thorough testing to ensure reliability. Consider implementing unit tests for:
Core functionality tests:
- File selection and validation
- Image processing and resizing
- File removal and array manipulation
- Media folder integration
- Progress tracking
Edge cases and error handling:
- Invalid file types
- Large file handling
- Network failures during upload
- Empty file selections
- Malformed file data
User interaction tests:
- File dialog opening
- File item clicks
- Reset functionality
- Validation states
Mock dependencies:
loadImageglobal functionFliplet.Media.FilesAPIFliplet.Navigate.filemethodExample test structure:
describe('File Component', function() { beforeEach(function() { // Setup component instance and mocks }); describe('File Selection', function() { it('should handle single file selection', function() { // Test implementation }); it('should handle multiple file selection', function() { // Test implementation }); it('should validate file types against accept prop', function() { // Test implementation }); }); describe('Image Processing', function() { it('should process image files with metadata', function() { // Test implementation }); it('should apply size constraints to images', function() { // Test implementation }); }); describe('File Removal', function() { it('should remove files by index', function() { // Test implementation }); it('should reprocess remaining images after removal', function() { // Test implementation }); }); });js/components/date.js (3)
5-139: Add comprehensive JSDoc documentation for all methods and propertiesThe component lacks proper JSDoc documentation for its methods, computed properties, and data properties. According to the Google JavaScript style guide, all functions and significant properties should be documented.
Consider adding JSDoc comments such as:
props: { + /** @type {String} Placeholder text for the date input */ placeholder: { type: String }, + /** @type {String} Help text description */ description: { type: String }, // ... other props }, methods: { + /** + * Initialises the date picker component + * @private + */ initDatePicker: function() { // ... existing code }, + /** + * Handles form submission preparation + * @param {Object} data - Form submission data + * @private + */ onBeforeSubmit: function(data) { // ... existing code } }
81-81: Fix double space in conditionThere's an extra space between
&&and the array literal.- if (val === '' && ['default', 'always'].indexOf(this.autofill) > -1) { + if (val === '' && ['default', 'always'].indexOf(this.autofill) > -1) {
5-139: Implement comprehensive unit testingThe component lacks unit tests. According to the coding guidelines, ensure adequate testing coverage with unit tests.
Consider creating tests for:
- Component initialisation and props handling
- Date picker integration and value changes
- Validation logic for required fields
- Autofill behaviour (
always,default,custom,empty)- Form submission handling
- Default value source handling
Example test structure:
describe('Date Component', () => { it('should initialise with correct default values', () => { // Test default data values }); it('should handle autofill "always" setting', () => { // Test autofill behaviour }); it('should validate required fields', () => { // Test validation logic }); it('should emit correct events on value change', () => { // Test event emission }); });js/components/number.js (5)
33-55: Add JSDoc documentation to the validations functionThe validations function should be documented to explain its purpose and return value for better maintainability.
+ /** + * Builds validation rules based on component configuration. + * @returns {Object} Validation rules object for the form field + */ validations: function() {
57-70: Add JSDoc documentation to positiveValidator methodThe method should be documented to explain its purpose and parameters for better maintainability.
+ /** + * Creates a validator that ensures numeric values are positive (≥ 0). + * @returns {Function} Validation function that returns true for positive numbers + */ positiveValidator: function() {
71-105: Add JSDoc documentation to decimalValidator methodThe method should be documented to explain its purpose and parameters for better maintainability.
+ /** + * Creates a validator that enforces decimal precision constraints. + * @param {number} maxNumbersAfterPoint - Maximum allowed decimal places + * @returns {Function} Validation function that checks decimal precision + */ decimalValidator: function(maxNumbersAfterPoint) {
78-78: Consider making the decimal regex more restrictiveThe current regex allows up to 10 decimal places but should respect the
maxNumbersAfterPointparameter dynamically.- var decimal = /^(-?\d+((\.)\d{1,10})?)$/; + var decimal = new RegExp('^(-?\\d+((\\.)\\d{1,' + maxNumbersAfterPoint + '})?)$');
1-107: Suggested unit testing planBased on the component's functionality, here's a comprehensive testing plan:
describe('Number Field Component', () => { // Props testing describe('Props', () => { it('should accept placeholder prop', () => {}); it('should accept positiveOnly prop with default false', () => {}); it('should accept decimals prop with default 0', () => {}); it('should accept description prop', () => {}); }); // Validation testing describe('Validations', () => { it('should validate integer input when decimals is 0', () => {}); it('should validate decimal input when decimals > 0', () => {}); it('should enforce positive-only validation when enabled', () => {}); it('should enforce required validation when field is required', () => {}); it('should enforce max length of 15 characters', () => {}); }); // Validator methods testing describe('positiveValidator', () => { it('should return true for positive numbers', () => {}); it('should return true for zero', () => {}); it('should return false for negative numbers', () => {}); it('should return true for empty values', () => {}); }); describe('decimalValidator', () => { it('should validate correct decimal precision', () => {}); it('should reject excessive decimal places', () => {}); it('should handle negative decimals', () => {}); it('should return true for empty values', () => {}); it('should reject non-numeric input', () => {}); it('should reject NaN values', () => {}); }); });
♻️ Duplicate comments (7)
js/components/image.js (1)
3-6: JSDoc header still missing@componentand detailed@vue-proptagsThe previous feedback about enriching the header hasn’t been addressed. Adding these tags ensures automated doc generators list the component and all its props correctly.
/** * Image field component – renders an image capture and upload input in forms. * Supports camera capture, file upload. + * + * @component ImageField + * @vue-prop {String} accept - Allowed MIME types / extensions + * @vue-prop {Number} [customWidth=1024] - Target width for scaled images + * @vue-prop {Number} [customHeight=1024] - Target height for scaled images + * @vue-prop {Number} [jpegQuality=80] - JPEG compression quality (0-100) + * @vue-prop {Array<String>} [value=[]] - Current images (data-URLs / paths) + * @vue-prop {Boolean} [saveProgress=false] - Persist in-progress uploads + * @vue-prop {Number|null} [mediaFolderId=null] - Fliplet media folder ID + * @vue-prop {Object} [mediaFolderData={}] - Metadata for the media folder + * @vue-prop {Array} [mediaFolderNavStack=[]] - Folder navigation stack + * @vue-prop {Boolean} [hasCorruptedImage=false] - Flag corrupted images + * @vue-prop {Boolean} [canHide=false] - Whether the field can be hidden + * @vue-prop {String} [description] - Field description/help text + * @vue-prop {Boolean} [isImageSizeExceeded=false] - Flag oversized images */js/components/matrix.js (1)
1-4: Still missing@fileoverview– previous feedback not addressed
The file-level JSDoc header does not include the@fileoverviewtag required by the Google JS Style Guide.-/** - * Matrix field component – renders a grid-based selection interface in forms. - * Supports multiple rows and columns with radio selection mode. - */ +/** + * @fileoverview Matrix field component – renders a grid-based selection + * interface in forms. Supports multiple rows and columns with radio + * selection mode. + */js/components/password.js (1)
1-8: Enhance JSDoc with explicit security-related props documentationThe JSDoc provides a good overview but doesn't fully address the previous review feedback. Consider explicitly listing the security-related props with their defaults to improve clarity for contributors.
/** * This component provides a password input field with advanced features including: * - Password strength validation with customizable rules * - Password confirmation field * - Auto-generation of secure passwords * - Password hashing support * - Progress saving and population on update + * + * @prop {Boolean} hash - Enable password hashing (default: false) + * @prop {Boolean} autogenerate - Enable automatic password generation (default: false) + * @prop {Boolean} confirm - Enable password confirmation field (default: false) + * @prop {Boolean} saveProgress - Enable progress saving (default: false) + * @prop {Boolean} populateOnUpdate - Enable population on update (default: false) */js/components/radio.js (1)
1-12: Address JSDoc formatting issues and trailing spacesThe JSDoc header has improved from the past review but still has several issues:
- Trailing spaces on lines 3 and 11 (flagged by static analysis)
- Missing
@fileoverviewtag for Google style compliance- Property documentation format could be enhanced
Apply this diff to fix the trailing spaces and improve the JSDoc format:
/** - * A single-select radio button component that allows users to choose one option from a list. - * + * @fileoverview A single-select radio button component that allows users to choose one option from a list. + * * @property {string} [description] - Optional description text displayed above the radio buttons * @property {Array<Object>} options - Array of option objects with label and optional id properties * @property {string} options[].label - Display text for the radio option * @property {string} [options[].id] - Unique identifier for the option (optional, falls back to label) * @property {boolean} [required=false] - Whether the field is required for form submission * @property {boolean} [readonly=false] - Whether the field is read-only and cannot be modified * @property {string} value - The currently selected option value (id or label) - * + * */js/components/horizontalRule.js (1)
1-3: Enhance the JSDoc block with standard tags for Google JS style guide compliance.The JSDoc comment still lacks standard tags like @component, @prop, and @example. This was previously suggested and should be implemented to comply with the Google JavaScript style guide and improve automated documentation generation.
js/components/file.js (1)
3-6: Add@fileoverviewtag for header consistencyBring header in line with other files.
-/** - * File field component – renders a file upload input with progress tracking. - * Supports multiple file types and media folder integration. - */ +/** + * @fileoverview File field component – file upload input with progress + * tracking, multi-type support, image resizing and media-folder integration. + */js/components/date.js (1)
1-4: Add formal JSDoc tags for consistency with Google JS style guideThe header comment lacks standard JSDoc tags required by the Google JavaScript style guide. Adding
@module,@vueComponent, and related tags improves IDE support and documentation generation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
js/components/date.js(1 hunks)js/components/file.js(1 hunks)js/components/horizontalRule.js(1 hunks)js/components/image.js(1 hunks)js/components/matrix.js(1 hunks)js/components/number.js(1 hunks)js/components/password.js(1 hunks)js/components/radio.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.js`: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide ...
**/*.js: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide and point out any mismatches. Ensure all code is fully documented. Suggest a testing plan to ensure code is adequately tested. Suggest unit tests. Avoid integration tests.
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
js/components/file.jsjs/components/horizontalRule.jsjs/components/matrix.jsjs/components/radio.jsjs/components/password.jsjs/components/date.jsjs/components/number.jsjs/components/image.js
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
js/components/radio.js
[notice] 3-3: js/components/radio.js#L3
Trailing spaces not allowed.
🪛 GitHub Check: Linting
js/components/radio.js
[failure] 11-11:
Trailing spaces not allowed
[failure] 3-3:
Trailing spaces not allowed
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (1)
js/components/date.js (1)
58-62: Props are already declared in the core mixinThe properties
defaultValueSourceanddefaultValueKeyare defined as props injs/libs/core.js, so they’re available injs/components/date.jswithout further action:// js/libs/core.js defaultValueSource: { type: String, default: 'default' }, defaultValueKey: { type: String, default: '' },No changes needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (6)
js/components/textarea.js (3)
31-35: Add JSDoc documentation for thereplaceNewLinesmethodThe method lacks proper documentation explaining its purpose and parameters according to the Google JavaScript style guide.
Add comprehensive JSDoc documentation:
+ /** + * Replaces newline characters with HTML line breaks. + * @param {string} value - The text value containing newline characters + * @returns {string} The text with newlines replaced by <br> tags + */ replaceNewLines: function(value) { return value.replace(/(?:\r\n|\r|\n)/g, '<br>'); }
20-30: Add JSDoc documentation for thevalidationsmethodThe validation method should be documented to explain its purpose and return value according to the Google JavaScript style guide.
Add JSDoc documentation:
+ /** + * Defines validation rules for the textarea field. + * @returns {Object} Validation rules object with value property containing applicable validators + */ validations: function() { var rules = { value: {} };
5-36: Suggest comprehensive unit testing planThe component lacks testing coverage. Consider implementing unit tests to ensure reliability and maintainability.
Create unit tests covering:
Props validation tests:
- Test default
rowsvalue (should be 2)- Test
placeholderstring handling- Test
descriptionstring handlingValidation logic tests:
- Test required field validation when
required=trueandreadonly=false- Test no validation when
required=false- Test no validation when
readonly=trueMethod functionality tests:
- Test
replaceNewLineswith various newline characters (\n,\r\n,\r)- Test
replaceNewLineswith mixed content- Test
replaceNewLineswith empty stringComponent integration tests:
- Test component registration with Fliplet.FormBuilder
- Test component name and category properties
Would you like me to generate the specific test implementations?
js/components/telephone.js (3)
15-27: Add JSDoc documentation for the validations functionThe validations function lacks documentation explaining its purpose, parameters, and return value. This is required for comprehensive code documentation.
Apply this diff to add proper JSDoc documentation:
+ /** + * Defines validation rules for the telephone field. + * @returns {Object} Validation rules object with phone regex and optional required validation + */ validations: function() {
7-14: Document component props with JSDocThe props object should be documented with JSDoc comments to explain each property's purpose and usage.
Apply this diff to add JSDoc documentation for props:
+ /** + * Component properties + * @typedef {Object} TelephoneProps + * @property {string} placeholder - Placeholder text for the input field + * @property {string} description - Help text displayed below the input + */ props: {
4-28: Create unit tests for the telephone componentNo unit tests are present for this component. The Google JavaScript style guide emphasises proper testing coverage.
Create a test file
test/components/telephone.test.jswith the following test cases:describe('Telephone Component', function() { let component; beforeEach(function() { component = Fliplet.FormBuilder.field('telephone'); }); describe('validations', function() { it('should validate phone number format', function() { const validNumbers = ['+44 20 7946 0958', '020 7946 0958', '(020) 7946-0958']; const invalidNumbers = ['abc', '123abc', 'phone@email.com']; validNumbers.forEach(number => { expect(component.validations().value.phone(number)).toBe(true); }); invalidNumbers.forEach(number => { expect(component.validations().value.phone(number)).toBe(false); }); }); it('should require validation when field is required and not readonly', function() { component.required = true; component.readonly = false; expect(component.validations().value.required).toBeDefined(); }); it('should not require validation when field is not required', function() { component.required = false; expect(component.validations().value.required).toBeUndefined(); }); }); describe('props', function() { it('should accept placeholder and description props', function() { expect(component.props.placeholder.type).toBe(String); expect(component.props.description.type).toBe(String); }); }); });
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
js/components/textarea.js (1)
1-4: Add standard JSDoc tags for completenessThe JSDoc comment is a good start but should include standard tags for better documentation consistency and machine readability.
Consider adding these standard JSDoc tags as suggested in previous reviews:
/** * Textarea field component – renders a multi-line text input field in forms. * Supports configurable rows, character limits, and validation in case the field is required. + * + * @component + * @category Text inputs + * @description Multi-line text input supporting configurable rows, character limits, and validation. */js/components/telephone.js (1)
1-3: Apply the previously suggested JSDoc improvementsThe current JSDoc comment doesn't follow the Google JavaScript style guide recommendations. A previous review suggested using proper JSDoc tags for consistency and improved IDE support.
Apply this diff to implement the suggested JSDoc structure:
/** - * Telephone field component – renders a phone number input with validation in forms. + * Telephone field component. + * + * @component + * @description Phone number input with validation, international formats and country codes. + * @example <telephone v-model="user.phone"></telephone> */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
js/components/reorderList.js(1 hunks)js/components/telephone.js(1 hunks)js/components/textarea.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.js`: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide ...
**/*.js: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide and point out any mismatches. Ensure all code is fully documented. Suggest a testing plan to ensure code is adequately tested. Suggest unit tests. Avoid integration tests.
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
js/components/telephone.jsjs/components/textarea.jsjs/components/reorderList.js
🪛 GitHub Check: Linting
js/components/reorderList.js
[failure] 1-1:
Expected indentation of 0 spaces but found 1
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
js/components/reorderList.js
[notice] 1-1: js/components/reorderList.js#L1
Expected indentation of 0 spaces but found 1.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (15)
js/components/url.js (3)
18-19: Fix typo and improve regex documentation.There's a typo in the comment and the regex documentation could be clearer.
Apply this diff to correct the typo and improve clarity:
- // URL regex taken form https://www.regextester.com/94502 and added % sign - urlCase: new RegExp(/^(?:http(s)?:\/\/)?[\w.-]+(?:\.[\w\.-]+)+[\w\-\._~:/?#[\]@%!\$&'\*\+,;=.]+$/i) + // URL regex taken from https://www.regextester.com/94502 with % sign added for encoded characters + urlCase: new RegExp(/^(?:http(s)?:\/\/)?[\w.-]+(?:\.[\w\.-]+)+[\w\-\._~:/?#[\]@%!\$&'\*\+,;=.]+$/i)
27-28: Add JSDoc comments for complex validation logic.The Unicode normalisation logic needs better documentation to explain its purpose.
Add JSDoc comments to explain the normalisation process:
value: { url: function(value) { - // Normalize()ing to NFD Unicode normal form decomposes combined graphemes into the combination of simple ones using a regex character class to match the U+0300 → U+036F range + /** + * Normalise to NFD Unicode form to decompose combined graphemes into simple ones, + * then remove combining diacritical marks (U+0300 → U+036F range) for validation + */ value = value.normalize('NFD').replace(/[\u0300-\u036f]/g, '');
4-41: Suggest comprehensive unit testing plan.The component lacks unit tests. A comprehensive testing plan should cover validation logic, prop handling, and edge cases.
Here's a suggested unit testing plan for the URL component:
// Test file: js/components/url.test.js describe('URL Field Component', () => { // Test valid URLs test('should accept valid HTTP URLs', () => { // Test http://example.com, https://example.com }); test('should accept valid URLs without protocol', () => { // Test example.com, www.example.com }); test('should accept URLs with special characters', () => { // Test URLs with %, query params, fragments }); // Test invalid URLs test('should reject invalid URLs', () => { // Test malformed URLs, spaces, invalid characters }); test('should handle Unicode characters correctly', () => { // Test URLs with diacritical marks }); // Test props test('should render with placeholder prop', () => { // Test placeholder text display }); test('should render with description prop', () => { // Test helper text display }); // Test validation states test('should validate required field', () => { // Test required validation when field is empty }); test('should skip validation for readonly field', () => { // Test readonly state bypasses validation }); });Would you like me to generate the complete unit test implementation?
js/components/time.js (5)
36-44: Use const instead of var for better scoping.Following the Google JavaScript Style Guide, prefer
constfor variables that are not reassigned.Apply this diff:
- var rules = { + const rules = { value: {} };
58-58: Use const instead of var for better scoping.Following the Google JavaScript Style Guide, prefer
constfor variables that are not reassigned.Apply this diff:
- var $vm = this; + const $vm = this;
52-77: Add JSDoc documentation for methods.The component methods lack proper JSDoc documentation which would improve code maintainability and IDE support.
Apply this diff to add comprehensive JSDoc documentation:
methods: { + /** + * Initialises the time picker widget. + * @private + */ initTimePicker: function() { if (this.timePicker || !this.$refs.timePicker) { return; } - var $vm = this; + const $vm = this; this.timePicker = Fliplet.UI.TimePicker(this.$refs.timePicker, { required: this.required || this.autofill === 'always', forceRequire: false, value: this.value, readonly: this.readonly }); this.timePicker.change(function(value) { $vm.value = value; $vm.updateValue(); }); }, + /** + * Handles form submission by setting autofill values. + * @param {Object} data - The form data object + * @private + */ onBeforeSubmit: function(data) { if (this.autofill === 'always' && data[this.name] === '') { data[this.name] = this.defaultSource === 'submission' ? moment().format('HH:mm') : this.now; } } },
78-85: Add JSDoc documentation for computed properties.The computed properties would benefit from JSDoc documentation to clarify their purpose and return values.
Apply this diff:
computed: { + /** + * Determines if the current date field should be applied. + * @returns {boolean} True if autofill is 'always' or 'default' + */ isApplyCurrentDateField: function() { return this.autofill === 'always' || this.autofill === 'default'; }, + /** + * Determines if the default value field should be shown. + * @returns {boolean} True if autofill is 'custom' + */ isDefaultValueField: function() { return this.autofill === 'custom'; } },
4-137: Implement comprehensive unit testing strategy.The component lacks test coverage. Given the complexity of time handling, validation, and autofill logic, comprehensive unit tests are essential.
Suggested testing plan:
- Props validation testing - Test all prop types and defaults
- Data initialisation testing - Verify initial state setup
- Validation rules testing - Test required field validation
- Time picker initialisation - Mock Fliplet.UI.TimePicker and test setup
- Autofill logic testing - Test all autofill scenarios ('always', 'default', 'custom', 'empty')
- Form submission testing - Test onBeforeSubmit hook behaviour
- Time format conversion - Test HH:mm A to HH:mm conversion in beforeUpdate
- Computed properties testing - Test isApplyCurrentDateField and isDefaultValueField
- Watcher testing - Test value watcher logic and edge cases
Key test cases to include:
- Time format validation and conversion
- Required field validation
- Autofill with different sources ('load', 'submission')
- Edge cases for empty values and validation
- Time picker widget integration
Would you like me to generate specific unit test implementations for any of these areas?
js/components/wysiwyg.js (5)
10-24: Document component props with JSDocAdd JSDoc documentation for each prop to improve code maintainability and follow Google JavaScript style guide.
props: { + /** + * Placeholder text displayed in the editor when empty + * @type {String} + */ placeholder: { type: String }, + /** + * Number of rows to display in the editor + * @type {Number} + * @default 5 + */ rows: { type: Number, default: 5 }, + /** + * Description text for the field + * @type {String} + */ description: { type: String }, + /** + * Unique identifier for the TinyMCE instance + * @type {Number} + */ tinymceId: { type: Number } },
55-64: Improve error handling and add JSDoc documentationThe current error handling is too generic and lacks documentation.
+ /** + * Resets the editor content to the current value + * Called when the form is reset + */ onReset: function() { if (this.editor) { try { return this.editor.setContent(this.value); } catch (e) { - // nothing + console.warn('Failed to reset WYSIWYG editor content:', e); } } },
65-72: Add JSDoc documentation for keyboard shortcut methodsDocument the purpose and behaviour of these methods.
+ /** + * Adds Windows-specific keyboard shortcuts for bulleted lists + * Registers Ctrl+Shift+8 to insert unordered lists + */ addBulletedListShortcutsWindows: function() { var $vm = this; // For Windows this.editor.addShortcut('ctrl+shift+8', 'UnorderedList', function() { $vm.editor.execCommand('InsertUnorderedList'); }); }, + /** + * Handles Mac-specific keyboard shortcuts for bulleted lists + * @param {KeyboardEvent} event - The keyboard event + */ addBulletedListShortcutsMac: function(event) { if (event.metaKey && event.code === 'BracketLeft') { event.preventDefault(); this.editor.execCommand('InsertUnorderedList'); } }
82-84: Extract magic number to a named constantThe line height value should be a named constant for better maintainability.
mounted: function() { var $vm = this; - var lineHeight = 55; + var EDITOR_LINE_HEIGHT = 55; - this.tinymceId = _.kebabCase(this.name) + '-' + $(this.$refs.textarea).parents('[data-form-builder-id]').data('formBuilderId'); + this.tinymceId = _.kebabCase(this.name) + '-' + $(this.$refs.textarea).parents('[data-form-builder-id]').data('formBuilderId');And update the references:
- max_height: lineHeight * this.rows, - min_height: lineHeight * this.rows, + max_height: EDITOR_LINE_HEIGHT * this.rows, + min_height: EDITOR_LINE_HEIGHT * this.rows,
7-232: Implement comprehensive unit testingThe component lacks unit tests. Create a testing plan to ensure adequate coverage.
Suggested unit tests:
Props validation tests:
- Test default values for props
- Test prop type validation
Method tests:
onReset()- Test editor content resetaddBulletedListShortcutsWindows()- Test shortcut registrationaddBulletedListShortcutsMac()- Test Mac shortcut handlingComputed property tests:
isInterface- Test interface detectionWatcher tests:
- Test value watcher updates editor content correctly
- Test programmatic value updates
Validation tests:
- Test required field validation
- Test readonly field validation bypass
TinyMCE integration tests:
- Test editor initialisation
- Test configuration setup
- Test event handler registration
Create a test file
test/components/wysiwyg.spec.jswith these test cases using a testing framework like Jest or Mocha.Would you like me to generate the complete unit test file with these test cases?
js/components/title.js (1)
4-23: Add comprehensive unit testing planAccording to the coding guidelines, a testing plan should be suggested to ensure adequate test coverage. The title component should have unit tests covering its core functionality.
Recommended unit tests for the title component:
/** * Unit tests for title field component * Test file: test/components/title.test.js */ describe('Title Field Component', () => { describe('Component Registration', () => { it('should register title field with correct name and category', () => { // Test component registration }); it('should have submit property set to false', () => { // Test non-submittable field configuration }); }); describe('Props Validation', () => { it('should have correct default values for all props', () => { // Test: showLabel defaults to false // Test: value defaults to 'Title' // Test: canHide defaults to false }); it('should validate prop types correctly', () => { // Test: showLabel accepts boolean values // Test: value accepts string values // Test: canHide accepts boolean values }); }); describe('Rendering Behaviour', () => { it('should render with default title text', () => { // Test default rendering }); it('should render with custom title text', () => { // Test custom value prop }); it('should handle label visibility correctly', () => { // Test showLabel prop behaviour }); }); });js/libs/builder.js (1)
40-42: Bug: using.lengthon an object always yieldsundefined
formSlideParent/formSliderParentare single objects returned byArray.prototype.find.
Accessing.lengthwill therefore beundefined, so both assignments always result inundefined.-data.slideId = formSlideParent.length && formSlideParent.slideId; -data.sliderContainerId = formSliderParent.length && formSliderParent.sliderId; +data.slideId = formSlideParent && formSlideParent.slideId; +data.sliderContainerId = formSliderParent && formSliderParent.sliderId;This fixes the logic and keeps the booleans intact.
♻️ Duplicate comments (6)
js/components/typeahead.js (1)
1-4: Add param / prop tags to the JSDoc headerFor parity with the other components and better IDE support include structured tags such as
@component,@vue-prop {Array} value,@vue-prop {Number|null} maxItems, etc.js/components/timer.js (1)
1-4: Use an@fileoverviewJSDoc header to stay consistent with the project’s stylePrior reviews already flagged this; the header is still missing the
@fileoverviewdirective used elsewhere in the codebase.-/** - * This component renders a stopwatch or countdown timer input. - * It can start automatically, track elapsed or remaining time, and store the value persistently. - */ +/** + * @fileoverview Timer field component – renders a stopwatch or countdown + * timer input. Supports auto-start, elapsed/remaining time tracking, and + * persistent storage of the recorded value. + * @component + */js/components/url.js (1)
1-3: Enhance JSDoc documentation with detailed prop and validation information.The basic JSDoc comment should be expanded to include detailed prop documentation and validation information as suggested in the previous review.
Add the following comprehensive JSDoc tags:
/** * URL field component – renders a URL input field with validation in forms. + * @prop {String} [placeholder] Input placeholder text + * @prop {String} [description] Helper text displayed under the field + * @validation Custom URL regex validation defined in data() method */js/components/time.js (1)
1-3: Upgrade to formal JSDoc as previously suggested.The JSDoc comment is a good start, but as noted in the previous review, it should be upgraded to formal JSDoc with explicit tags for better IDE support and tooling integration.
Apply this diff to implement the previously suggested improvements:
/** - * Time field component – renders a time picker input for selecting hours and minutes. + * Time field component. + * + * @component + * @description Time picker that supports 12/24-hour formats and validation. + * @example <time-picker v-model="meeting.startTime"></time-picker> */js/components/wysiwyg.js (1)
1-6: Preface file comment with@fileoverviewAlign with project style as previously suggested.
-/** - * WYSIWYG field component - Renders a rich text editor powered by TinyMCE that allows users to create and edit - * formatted HTML content within forms. Supports text styling, links, tables, lists, - * and various formatting options with a comprehensive toolbar interface. - * - */ +/** + * @fileoverview WYSIWYG field component - Renders a rich text editor powered by TinyMCE that allows users to create and edit + * formatted HTML content within forms. Supports text styling, links, tables, lists, + * and various formatting options with a comprehensive toolbar interface. + */js/libs/builder.js (1)
17-21: Replacevarwithconst/let– unresolved feedback from previous reviewThe original refactor request (see past comments) is still outstanding. Using
varhere defeats block-scoping and triggers thenoVarrule.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
js/components/time.js(1 hunks)js/components/timer.js(1 hunks)js/components/title.js(1 hunks)js/components/typeahead.js(1 hunks)js/components/url.js(1 hunks)js/components/wysiwyg.js(1 hunks)js/libs/builder.js(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.js`: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide ...
**/*.js: Review the JavaScript code against the Google JavaScript style guide and point out any mismatches. Ensure all code is fully documented. Suggest a testing plan to ensure code is adequately tested. Suggest unit tests. Avoid integration tests.
⚙️ Source: CodeRabbit Configuration File
List of files the instruction was applied to:
js/components/title.jsjs/components/typeahead.jsjs/components/time.jsjs/components/url.jsjs/components/timer.jsjs/components/wysiwyg.jsjs/libs/builder.js
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
js/libs/builder.js (2)
js/libs/core.js (2)
parents(1114-1114)formSlideParent(489-491)js/libs/form.js (1)
formSlideParent(195-197)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
js/libs/builder.js
[error] 17-18: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole module. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 18-18: Use Number.parseInt instead of the equivalent global.
ES2015 moved some globals into the Number namespace for consistency.
Safe fix: Use Number.parseInt instead.
(lint/style/useNumberNamespace)
[error] 18-19: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole module. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 19-20: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole module. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'const' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
[error] 20-21: Use let or const instead of var.
A variable declared with var is accessible in the whole module. Thus, the variable can be accessed before its initialization and outside the block where it is declared.
See MDN web docs for more details.
Unsafe fix: Use 'let' instead.
(lint/style/noVar)
🪛 GitHub Check: Linting
js/libs/builder.js
[failure] 6-6:
Trailing spaces not allowed
[failure] 3-3:
Trailing spaces not allowed
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (1)
js/libs/builder.js (1)
48-51: Inline comment adds helpful context – looks goodThe new note succinctly explains why
_.compactis called. No action needed.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
New Features
Refactor