Skip to content

Added the logic to use genus level alignments #478

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

swatiebi
Copy link
Contributor

Requirements

When creating your Pull request, please fill out the template below:

PR details

Is this a fix/ update/ new feature?
new_feature

Include a short description
I have added a logic in the long read pipeline to use the genus level alignments when the species level is absent. It is worth testing this logic for some species for genus-level alignments. The added feature will look if the long_read_summary_file (Species-level) exists and is non-empty, use it. The long_read_summary_file_genus will not be used or downloaded. But If it's empty or missing, it exits with 42 and goes to branch 2 triggers the download using the genus file and runs the minimap alignments as usual.

Include links to JIRA tickets
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/panda/jira/browse/ENSGENEBUI-2370

Testing

Have you tested it?
Yes

Assign to the weekly GitHub reviewer

If you are a member of Ensembl, please check the Genebuild weekly Rotas and assign this week's GitHub reviewer to the PR

Copy link
Member

@leannehaggerty leannehaggerty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm thinking we might need some clade-level decision making for whether to use genus level data or not. What clade(s) has this been tested on so far?
I'd also like to understand where @ens-ftricomi investigation of the long-read consensus code got to, and how we could merge that here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants