You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However, I'm very confused about the Observation Encoder:
In your paper, you described that the observation embedding x_t is the concatenation of the image feature (after pooling to BEV), route map feature and speed feature: x_t = [x_t' , r_t, m_t].
That's to say, the order is : pooling to BEV → mapping to a 1D vector → concat route map feature and speed feature
But, in the code, it seems that the order is reversed: concat route map feature and speed feature → pooling to BEV → mapping to a 1D vector. Like the codes in Mile.mile.models.mile.py:
Very confused, or am I wrong? pls tell me...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,many thanks for your excellent work, Mile.
However, I'm very confused about the Observation Encoder:
In your paper, you described that the observation embedding x_t is the concatenation of the image feature (after pooling to BEV), route map feature and speed feature: x_t = [x_t' , r_t, m_t].
That's to say, the order is : pooling to BEV → mapping to a 1D vector → concat route map feature and speed feature
But, in the code, it seems that the order is reversed: concat route map feature and speed feature → pooling to BEV → mapping to a 1D vector. Like the codes in Mile.mile.models.mile.py:
Very confused, or am I wrong? pls tell me...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: