Move common device/driver implementations to base tt_device class

[vtangTT]

std::uint64_t tt_SimulationDevice::get_pcie_base_addr_from_device()
virtual void set_device_l1_address_params(const tt_device_l1_address_params& l1_address_params_);
virtual void set_device_dram_address_params(const tt_device_dram_address_params& dram_address_params_);
virtual void set_driver_host_address_params(const tt_driver_host_address_params& host_address_params_);
virtual void set_driver_eth_interface_params(const tt_driver_eth_interface_params& eth_interface_params_);

These ones are common among tt_SiliconDevice, tt_SimulationDevice, tt_EmulationDevice. There might be more.

FYI: @joelsmithTT

[joelsmithTT]

There may be fields in the tt_..._params structures that are unused, so there's an opportunity for some cleanup/consolidation here.

Also related: the error messages from tt_SiliconDevice are bad if a code path expects set_driver_eth_interface_params to have been previously called.

I think there is an opportunity here to make tt_SiliconDevice more difficult to use incorrectly.

[broskoTT]

Let's wait a bit to get clarity from #57
The future design does address having a base Chip class with common implementation (In the design, tt_SiliconDevice = LocalChip + RemoteChip, tt_SimulationDevice = VersimChip)