Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Custom options for scrubber generation #4023

Open
stg-annon opened this issue Aug 12, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

[Feature] Custom options for scrubber generation #4023

stg-annon opened this issue Aug 12, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@stg-annon
Copy link
Collaborator

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

A user may want to use a custom interval for the scrubber sprite they want to use, similar to how they are currently able to customize the preview generation video.

This may be even more useful with auto tagging tools that utilize the scrubber sprite with image recognition like StashTag

potential options might look like:

  • resolution
  • exclude start
  • exclude end
  • image interval

Describe the solution you'd like

options within stash to customize how the scene sprite image is generated

Describe alternatives you've considered

plugin or script that might replace the sprite image with a custom one but this may present stash with an unexpected format and cause issues where if stash is aware of the possibility of custom formats this would not be an issue

@WeedLordVegeta420
Copy link

As someone with a lot of longer 2+ hour videos, having control over the interval would be nice. My assumption though is that if you have this customization, you would still have to always generate the default sprite since I believe it is used for the phash generation.

@DogmaDragon
Copy link
Collaborator

@WeedLordVegeta420 pHash and sprites generation are not related.

@WeedLordVegeta420
Copy link

@DogmaDragon Ah. I do see now looking at the code that it generates its own sheet for generating the phash.

@IAmKontrast
Copy link

Feature would be also useful for #4022

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants