Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Static Anycast Gateway HLD #837

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 11, 2024
Merged

Static Anycast Gateway HLD #837

merged 7 commits into from
Apr 11, 2024

Conversation

superchild
Copy link
Contributor

@superchild superchild commented Aug 13, 2021 •
edited
Loading

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 13, 2021 •
edited by ghost
Loading

CLA assistant check
All CLA requirements met.

hasan-brcm
hasan-brcm reviewed Aug 23, 2021
View reviewed changes
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
hasan-brcm
hasan-brcm reviewed Aug 23, 2021
View reviewed changes
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
hasan-brcm
hasan-brcm reviewed Aug 23, 2021
View reviewed changes
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
preetham-singh
preetham-singh reviewed Aug 24, 2021
View reviewed changes
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
liat-grozovik
liat-grozovik reviewed Aug 24, 2021
View reviewed changes
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
liat-grozovik
liat-grozovik requested changes Aug 24, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@liat-grozovik liat-grozovik left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

General comments:

  • The HLD is missing a high level description before even discussing the config db which should be followed by yang model.
    Please check the HLD Template guidelines (https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/master/doc/hld_template.md) it is very helpful to understand the feature and be able to review the code later on.
  • The CLI as described is very high level and the part of the interface does not define and of the checkers expected on the CLI level. The CLI itself IMO should be described in the same way we have in the command reference md file.
  • The flow is very high level and does to explain clearly (although there is a flow image). i don't see any reference to the SAI it self and the parameters used. Missing flow of vlan interface delete, not the sag part.
  • The default behaviour should be clearly mentioned. it is disabled by default.
  • It was mentioned it must go with VXLAN/EVPN. Is there any validation? what will happen if not? what tis the expected behaviour? ignored? error?

doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dgsudharsan
dgsudharsan suggested changes Aug 24, 2021
View reviewed changes
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
preetham-singh
preetham-singh reviewed Aug 24, 2021
View reviewed changes
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
kperumalbfn
kperumalbfn reviewed Aug 24, 2021
View reviewed changes
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
doc/sag/sag-HLD.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@superchild
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kperumalbfn @venkatmahalingam @preetham-singh @hasan-brcm @dgsudharsan @liat-grozovik
All comments are replied and the HLD is updated.
Please help to check again.

This was referenced Oct 20, 2021
Merged
Open
Closed
Open
@superchild
Copy link
Contributor Author

All related PR's are sent and updated tracking table in this PR.
Please help to review it.

@zhangyanzhao
Copy link
Collaborator

@superchild would you please add the test PR into the code PR list? Thanks.

@superchild
Copy link
Contributor Author

superchild commented Oct 27, 2021 •
edited
Loading

@superchild would you please add the test PR into the code PR list? Thanks.

@zhangyanzhao What is the test PR?
The unit test code is included in the following 3 PRs

sonic-swss-common#540 and sonic-utilities#1887 don't have reviewer yet, could you please assign someone help to review?

Thanks.

@superchild superchild mentioned this pull request Apr 8, 2022
Merged
5 tasks
@yxieca yxieca force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 8498931 to 8837dc2 Compare April 15, 2022 16:51
@zhangyanzhao
Copy link
Collaborator

Reviewers, can you please help to finish your review on this feature? Thanks.
@gord1306 @kperumalbfn @venkatmahalingam @preetham-singh @hasan-brcm

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Feb 1, 2023 •
edited
Loading

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@liat-grozovik
Copy link
Collaborator

@superchild could you please sign the easyCLA?

@superchild
Copy link
Contributor Author

@liat-grozovik thanks for your reminder, already signed.

@zhangyanzhao
Copy link
Collaborator

@liat-grozovik can you please let me know if we can merge this PR? Nvidia is the registered reviewer. Thanks.

@liat-grozovik
Copy link
Collaborator

It was reviewed by Nvidia and approved (@dgsudharsan and @Junchao-Mellanox ). please go a head and merge the HLD.
as for code PRs, need to see the review and feedback

@zhangyanzhao
Copy link
Collaborator

General comments:

  • The HLD is missing a high level description before even discussing the config db which should be followed by yang model.
    Please check the HLD Template guidelines (https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/master/doc/hld_template.md) it is very helpful to understand the feature and be able to review the code later on.
  • The CLI as described is very high level and the part of the interface does not define and of the checkers expected on the CLI level. The CLI itself IMO should be described in the same way we have in the command reference md file.
  • The flow is very high level and does to explain clearly (although there is a flow image). i don't see any reference to the SAI it self and the parameters used. Missing flow of vlan interface delete, not the sag part.
  • The default behaviour should be clearly mentioned. it is disabled by default.
  • It was mentioned it must go with VXLAN/EVPN. Is there any validation? what will happen if not? what tis the expected behaviour? ignored? error?

@superchild can you please address this comment? Thanks.

wangxin pushed a commit to sonic-net/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2023
@superchild
Add static-anycast-gateway(SAG) test plan (#5486)
5933c1f 
How did you do it?
Bases on the SAG HLD sonic-net/SONiC#837, design needed test cases to verify its functionality.

How did you verify/test it?
Executing all SAG sonic-mgmt test cases using edge-core devices

Any platform specific information?
N/A

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
ptf32, ptf64
@superchild superchild mentioned this pull request Jun 16, 2023
Open
mrkcmo pushed a commit to Azarack/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2023
@superchild @parmarkj
Add static-anycast-gateway(SAG) test plan (sonic-net#5486)
c78343f 
How did you do it?
Bases on the SAG HLD sonic-net/SONiC#837, design needed test cases to verify its functionality.

How did you verify/test it?
Executing all SAG sonic-mgmt test cases using edge-core devices

Any platform specific information?
N/A

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
ptf32, ptf64
@zhangyanzhao
Copy link
Collaborator

HLD has been reviewed in SONiC community on 8/24/2021

@zhangyanzhao
Copy link
Collaborator

HLD was reviewed and approved by reviewers, merge the HLD.

@zhangyanzhao
Copy link
Collaborator

@liat-grozovik NVIDIA is the reviewing company, can you please merge this PR? Thanks.

AharonMalkin pushed a commit to AharonMalkin/sonic-mgmt that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
@superchild @AharonMalkin
Add static-anycast-gateway(SAG) test plan (sonic-net#5486)
013aa67 
How did you do it?
Bases on the SAG HLD sonic-net/SONiC#837, design needed test cases to verify its functionality.

How did you verify/test it?
Executing all SAG sonic-mgmt test cases using edge-core devices

Any platform specific information?
N/A

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?
ptf32, ptf64
qiluo-msft pushed a commit to sonic-net/sonic-swss-common that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2024
@superchild
[schema] Add SAG table for static anycast gateway (#540)
e4db436 
Add SAG table definition for static anycast gateway.
Static anycast gateway HLD [#837](sonic-net/SONiC#837)
@liat-grozovik liat-grozovik merged commit 76cc52f into sonic-net:master Apr 11, 2024
@yanjundeng yanjundeng mentioned this pull request May 24, 2024
Open
@yanjundeng
Copy link

yanjundeng commented Jun 1, 2024 •
edited
Loading

New Updated PRs:
sonic-swss : sonic-net/sonic-swss#3167
sonic-utility: sonic-net/sonic-utilities#3339
sonic-buildimage: sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#19069

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@gord1306 gord1306 gord1306 left review comments

@kperumalbfn kperumalbfn kperumalbfn left review comments

@preetham-singh preetham-singh preetham-singh left review comments

@hasan-brcm hasan-brcm hasan-brcm left review comments

@dgsudharsan dgsudharsan dgsudharsan approved these changes

@venkatmahalingam venkatmahalingam venkatmahalingam approved these changes

@liat-grozovik liat-grozovik liat-grozovik approved these changes

@Junchao-Mellanox Junchao-Mellanox Junchao-Mellanox approved these changes

Assignees

@superchild superchild

Labels
None yet
Projects
SONiC 202305 Release
Status: ✅ Done
SONiC 202405 Release
Status: 🆕 Backlog (not in plan yet)
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.