Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Tracking issue for RFC 2025: Enabled nested method calls #44100

Closed
2 of 4 tasks
aturon opened this issue Aug 26, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed
2 of 4 tasks

Tracking issue for RFC 2025: Enabled nested method calls #44100

aturon opened this issue Aug 26, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
A-NLL Area: Non Lexical Lifetimes (NLL) B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented. C-tracking-issue Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature. T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Aug 26, 2017 •
edited by jonas-schievink
Loading

This is a tracking issue for the RFC "Enable nested method calls" (rust-lang/rfcs#2025).

Steps:

Issues and questions to be resolved prior to stabilization:
@aturon aturon added B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented. T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 26, 2017
@aturon aturon mentioned this issue Aug 26, 2017
Merged
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum added the C-tracking-issue Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature. label Aug 26, 2017
@da-x da-x mentioned this issue Oct 14, 2017
Closed
@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis mentioned this issue Dec 20, 2017
Closed
@pnkfelix pnkfelix mentioned this issue Dec 21, 2017
Open
@pnkfelix pnkfelix added A-NLL Area: Non Lexical Lifetimes (NLL) WG-compiler-nll labels Dec 21, 2017
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

closing in favor of #43234

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

pnkfelix commented Nov 29, 2018 •
edited
Loading

(I'm a little worried that closing this in favor of #43234 is going to increase the chance that we either overlook or prepetually delay resolving #46901...)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
A-NLL Area: Non Lexical Lifetimes (NLL) B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented. C-tracking-issue Category: A tracking issue for an RFC or an unstable feature. T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@nikomatsakis @pnkfelix @aturon @Mark-Simulacrum