<expected>: std::function returning expected<any, int> emits error C7608: atomic constraint should be a constant expression

[StephanTLavavej]

Originally reported by Jared Resch as https://godbolt.org/z/YTe7hYPrq . I've further reduced this to https://godbolt.org/z/Ebadxz43K which is accepted by libstdc++ and libc++, but rejected by VS 2022 17.8 Preview 1:

C:\Temp>type meow.cpp

#include <any>
#include <expected>
#include <functional>
using namespace std;

using X = expected<any, int>;

X meow() {
    return {};
}

int main() {
    function<X()> f{meow};
}

C:\Temp>cl /EHsc /nologo /W4 /std:c++latest meow.cpp
meow.cpp
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\expected(258): error C7608: atomic constraint should be a constant expression
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\expected(258): note: the template instantiation context (the oldest one first) is
meow.cpp(13): note: while processing the default template argument of 'std::function<X (void)>::function(_Fx &&)'
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\functional(1050): note: see reference to alias template instantiation 'std::_Func_class<_Ret>::_Enable_if_callable_t<X(__cdecl &)(void),std::function<X (void)>>' being compiled
        with
        [
            _Ret=X
        ]
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\functional(892): note: see reference to variable template 'const bool conjunction_v<std::negation<std::is_same<std::expected<std::any,int> __cdecl(void),std::function<std::expected<std::any,int> __cdecl(void)> > >,std::_Is_invocable_r<std::expected<std::any,int>,std::expected<std::any,int> (__cdecl*&)(void)> >' being compiled
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\functional(892): note: see reference to class template instantiation 'std::_Is_invocable_r<_Ret,X (__cdecl *&)(void)>' being compiled
        with
        [
            _Ret=X
        ]
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\type_traits(1889): note: see reference to alias template instantiation 'std::_Is_invocable_r_<_Rx,_Callable,>' being compiled
        with
        [
            _Rx=X,
            _Callable=X (__cdecl *&)(void)
        ]
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\type_traits(1886): note: see reference to alias template instantiation 'std::_Invoke_traits_common<std::expected<std::any,int>,false>::_Is_invocable_r<_Rx>' being compiled
        with
        [
            _Rx=X
        ]
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\type_traits(1810): note: see reference to variable template 'const bool disjunction_v<std::is_void<std::expected<std::any,int> >,std::_Invoke_convertible<std::expected<std::any,int>,std::expected<std::any,int>,void> >' being compiled
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\expected(271): note: see reference to variable template 'const bool std::expected<std::any,int>::_Allow_unwrapping<std::any,int>' being compiled
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\expected(242): note: see reference to variable template 'const bool disjunction_v<std::is_same<std::any,bool>,std::negation<std::disjunction<std::is_constructible<std::any,std::expected<std::any,int> &>,std::is_constructible<std::any,std::expected<std::any,int> >,std::is_constructible<std::any,std::expected<std::any,int> const &>,std::is_constructible<std::any,std::expected<std::any,int> const >,std::is_convertible<std::expected<std::any,int> &,std::any>,std::is_convertible<std::expected<std::any,int> &&,std::any>,std::is_convertible<std::expected<std::any,int> const &,std::any>,std::is_convertible<std::expected<std::any,int> const &&,std::any> > > >' being compiled
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\expected(250): note: see reference to class template instantiation 'std::is_constructible<_Ty,std::expected<_Ty,int> &>' being compiled
        with
        [
            _Ty=std::any
        ]
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\type_traits(755): note: while processing the default template argument of 'std::any::any(_ValueType &&)'
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\any(138): note: see reference to variable template 'const bool conjunction_v<std::negation<std::is_same<std::expected<std::any,int>,std::any> >,std::negation<std::_Is_specialization<std::expected<std::any,int>,std::in_place_type_t> >,std::is_copy_constructible<std::expected<std::any,int> > >' being compiled
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\expected(258): error C2131: expression did not evaluate to a constant
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\expected(258): note: failure was caused by a read of an uninitialized symbol
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Preview\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.38.32919\include\expected(258): note: see usage of 'std::expected<std::any,int>::_Allow_unwrapping<std::any,int>'

I haven't figured out the root cause yet (library bug? compiler bug? an LWG issue resolution we've implemented that the others haven't?).

[CaseyCarter]

My constraint recursion sense is tingling: I suspect expected<any, int> is (copy or move) constructible only if it's (copy or move) constructible. The any(T&&) constructor is a factory for constraint recursion.

EDIT: clang-cl accepts the program whereas MSVC rejects it.

EDIT 2: MSVC accepts with:

+    template <class _ValueType>
+        requires (!same_as<decay_t<_ValueType>, any> && !_Is_specialization<decay_t<_ValueType>, in_place_type_t>)
+              && copy_constructible<decay_t<_ValueType>>
-    template <class _ValueType, enable_if_t<conjunction_v<negation<is_same<decay_t<_ValueType>, any>>,
-                                                negation<_Is_specialization<decay_t<_ValueType>, in_place_type_t>>,
-                                                is_copy_constructible<decay_t<_ValueType>>>,
-                                    int> = 0>
     any(_ValueType&& _Value) { // initialize with _Value
         _Emplace<decay_t<_ValueType>>(_STD forward<_ValueType>(_Value));
     }

Maybe an MSVC bug? Nevermind, correcting _Is_specialization to _Is_specialization_v in the requires-clause produces the same error.

[achabense]

The test case will compile if expected(expected<_Uty, _UErr>&&/const&) reject expected<_Ty,_Err> (itself):

STL/stl/inc/expected

Lines 269 to 270 in 6c69a73

	template <class _Uty, class _UErr>
	requires is_constructible_v<_Ty, _Uty> && is_constructible_v<_Err, _UErr> && _Allow_unwrapping<_Uty, _UErr>

template <class _Uty, class _UErr>
    requires (!is_same_v<_Ty, _Uty> || !is_same_v<_Err, _UErr>) && other constraints)
...