Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add some clarifications around implementation requirements for MSCs #1718

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

uhoreg
Copy link
Member

@uhoreg uhoreg commented Jan 24, 2024

  • clarify that implementations don't need to be merged to be considered
  • implementations may be required on both client-side and server-side
  • explain labels, and how to tell us about implementations

Preview: https://pr1718--matrix-spec-previews.netlify.app

@uhoreg uhoreg changed the title Add some clarifications around implemenation requirements Add some clarifications around implemenation requirements for MSCs Jan 24, 2024
@uhoreg uhoreg marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2024 17:07
@uhoreg uhoreg requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2024 17:07
@uhoreg
Copy link
Member Author

uhoreg commented Jan 24, 2024

At some point, we may want to say some more things about what we want/expect from an implementation, but that's probably the topic of a future PR.

Copy link
Member

@richvdh richvdh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM otherwise

content/proposals.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/proposals.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@richvdh richvdh changed the title Add some clarifications around implemenation requirements for MSCs Add some clarifications around implementation requirements for MSCs Mar 12, 2024
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
@uhoreg uhoreg merged commit 0b43b5a into matrix-org:main Mar 13, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants