You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am trying to interpret the results of a Dunn's test with a BH correction but I'm confused with how the dunn_test() function applies the correction and determines significance. I have 4 groups of shark species, so 6 pairwise comparisons and the resulting table tells me that 5 of my groupings are significantly different (adj.p<0.05).
However, when I perform the step-up procedure myself, I only get 4 significant results. I am ranking the adj.p.values smallest to largest, and comparing them to (i/m)*Q, where i=ranking, m=total number of comparisons, and Q=0.05. Can someone explain the discrepancy here? My two theories are: I have to do the step up procedure myself and use those results, OR, the bh applied in the package is using a different formula to determine significance and I should follow this formula instead.
For reference, I am comparing the median depths and temperatures of 4 shark species in the Atlantic ocean, with species sample sizes ranging between 14 and 32.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am trying to interpret the results of a Dunn's test with a BH correction but I'm confused with how the dunn_test() function applies the correction and determines significance. I have 4 groups of shark species, so 6 pairwise comparisons and the resulting table tells me that 5 of my groupings are significantly different (adj.p<0.05).
However, when I perform the step-up procedure myself, I only get 4 significant results. I am ranking the adj.p.values smallest to largest, and comparing them to (i/m)*Q, where i=ranking, m=total number of comparisons, and Q=0.05. Can someone explain the discrepancy here? My two theories are: I have to do the step up procedure myself and use those results, OR, the bh applied in the package is using a different formula to determine significance and I should follow this formula instead.
For reference, I am comparing the median depths and temperatures of 4 shark species in the Atlantic ocean, with species sample sizes ranging between 14 and 32.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: