Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Align properties #1817

Open
11 tasks
markostreich opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
11 tasks

Align properties #1817

markostreich opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@markostreich
Copy link
Contributor

markostreich commented Jul 2, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

As an administrator of DigiWF, I gain better clarity when properties are named consistently. The following properties should be renamed so that they no longer contain package names but instead begin with digiwf.

Describe the solution you'd like

Properties that start with io.muenchendigital.digiwf or de.muenchen.oss.digiwf should be renamed to start with digiwf only.

Findings are:
io.muenchendigital.digiwf.mail.*
de.muenchen.oss.digiwf.address. service.url
de.muenchen.oss.digiwf.connector.core.integrations.*
io.muenchendigital.digiwf.alw.personeninfo.*
io.muenchendigital.digiwf.cosys.*
io.muenchendigital.digiwf.message.*
de.muenchen.oss.digiwf.dms.supported-file-extensions.*
io.muenchendigital.digiwf.mail.*
de.muenchen.oss.digiwf.okewo.*
de.muenchen.oss.digiwf.ticketing.supported-file-extensions.*
io.muenchendigital.digiwf.streaming.typeMappings.correlatemessagev01

Describe alternatives you've considered

Properties remain as they are.

Acceptance Criteria

Properties are aligned in the following components within the application*.yaml files, in the properties and configuration classes both in the production code and in the test code, as well as in the ops repository:

  • engine
  • connector
  • address-integration
  • cosys-integration
  • dms-integration
  • email-integration
  • example-integration
  • okewo-integration
  • openai-integration
  • ticket-integration
  • s3-integration-client-example

Additional context

@markostreich markostreich self-assigned this Jul 2, 2024
@markostreich markostreich removed their assignment Jul 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant