Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unable to publish to crates.io due to naming conflict #222

Closed
Michael-F-Bryan opened this issue Jul 15, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #236
Closed

Unable to publish to crates.io due to naming conflict #222

Michael-F-Bryan opened this issue Jul 15, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #236

Comments

@Michael-F-Bryan
Copy link
Contributor

Michael-F-Bryan commented Jul 15, 2021

We can't publish the rune-XXX crates to crates.io because a Rune project already exists and it already has a bunch of rune-XXX crates.

I'm guessing the best solution would be to publish as hotg-rune-XXX, but for crates like hotg-rune-proc-block-macros the names are starting to get ridiculously long.

@akshr and @kthakore, can you think of a better solution?

This is blocking #210.

@kthakore
Copy link
Contributor

Could we do a private crates? Is hmr-* taken?

@Michael-F-Bryan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Michael-F-Bryan commented Jul 15, 2021

Could we do a private crates?

I don't think so. There's no such thing as a private crate on crates.io.. plus making it private probably doesn't line up with our open source plans, does it?

We could leave things as git dependencies, but that gives the feel of a project undergoing massive churn instead of something which has versioning guarantees.

Is hmr-* taken?

Nope, so we could always use hmr-rune-XXX as the prefix (e.g. hmr-rune-codegen or hmr-rune-cli). That said, Hammer is a different project to Rune, whereas hotg is the organisation behind Hammer and Rune.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants