Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

API: Expose more mirror related option. #24649

Open
buengese opened this issue May 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

API: Expose more mirror related option. #24649

buengese opened this issue May 10, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
topic/api Concerns mainly the API type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.

Comments

@buengese
Copy link

Feature Description

Please expose more of the mirror related configuration options via the API. Currently the only mirror related option that seems to be able to be updated via the API is mirror-interval. The following options should also be updatable via API in my opinion:

  • clone url (for pull mirors)
  • remote repository url (for push miror)
  • authorization options.
    In addition I especially want an option to convert a mirrored repository into a regular repository via the API.

Screenshots

No response

@buengese buengese added type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first. labels May 10, 2023
@lunny lunny removed the type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. label May 11, 2023
@Kovah
Copy link

Kovah commented Jan 15, 2024

I second this. The same endpoints that are available for push mirrors (#19796) would be great to have for pull mirrors. At the moment, there seems to be no way to get the remote mirror url of a repository via the API. 😕

@silverwind silverwind added the topic/api Concerns mainly the API label Mar 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic/api Concerns mainly the API type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants