You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not quite sure if it should actually search through archived repo's though?
It's useful but could be improved to have option to exclude them from search results. Also would be cool for archived repo results to show after normal repo results (using priority weights)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jpraet
added
type/feature
Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active.
type/proposal
The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.
and removed
type/feature
Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active.
labels
Nov 26, 2021
Another question is how the UI should look. I think we should not clutter the interface too much, so I imagine a cogwheel icon with a popup menu of options on the right side of the search bar, possibly also including the existing option for fuzzy search in there.
Perhaps another approach could be to allow repositories to opt themselves out of the indexer?
This way, by default, everything would work as it does now. But repo owners could opt out of indexing, whether the repo is archived or not, which in turn would hide them from code search results.
The added benefit of this would be that even live repos could opt out of search, which I personally would find very useful too.
Feature Description
It's useful but could be improved to have option to exclude them from search results. Also would be cool for archived repo results to show after normal repo results (using priority weights)
Originally posted by @lafriks in #17817 (comment)
Screenshots
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: