From 893474ea6d16497b23503582f5b85be2ea2bab0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: steveklabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 13:00:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Mention the name of ? in Result's docs

Fixes #42725

or at least, this is the best we can really do. #35946 is tracking
better errors already, so that should cover the other part of it.
---
 src/libcore/result.rs | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/libcore/result.rs b/src/libcore/result.rs
index db5bffced10cc..959935242dcc5 100644
--- a/src/libcore/result.rs
+++ b/src/libcore/result.rs
@@ -153,12 +153,12 @@
 //! }
 //! ```
 //!
-//! # The `?` syntax
+//! # The question mark operator, `?`
 //!
 //! When writing code that calls many functions that return the
-//! [`Result`] type, the error handling can be tedious. The [`?`]
-//! syntax hides some of the boilerplate of propagating errors up the
-//! call stack.
+//! [`Result`] type, the error handling can be tedious. The question mark
+//! operator, [`?`], hides some of the boilerplate of propagating errors
+//! up the call stack.
 //!
 //! It replaces this:
 //!