Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added "fax" and "modem" to acceptable protocols based on rfc2806. #255

Merged

Conversation

cjba7
Copy link
Contributor

@cjba7 cjba7 commented Jan 5, 2023

rfc2806 and its superseding standards state fax as an acceptable scheme.

@flavorjones
Copy link
Owner

Hi! Thanks for submitting this. Looking at the RFC, I also see the modem scheme. Is there any reason we shouldn't add that to the safelist while we're here?

@cjba7 cjba7 force-pushed the cjba7-add-fax-to-acceptable-protocols branch from 0fa21f4 to 64eadab Compare January 9, 2023 09:01
@cjba7
Copy link
Contributor Author

cjba7 commented Jan 9, 2023

@flavorjones makes sense. I have just added it.

@flavorjones
Copy link
Owner

Thank you! I've kicked off CI again, looks like the 2.5 failure is unrelated so ignore it. I'll merge when I get a block of time (later today?) and hopefully cut a release this week.

@cjba7
Copy link
Contributor Author

cjba7 commented Jan 10, 2023

Sounds good. Thanks for maintaining it!

@flavorjones flavorjones force-pushed the cjba7-add-fax-to-acceptable-protocols branch from 64eadab to ed2c917 Compare January 10, 2023 20:39
@flavorjones flavorjones merged commit 01305b6 into flavorjones:main Jan 10, 2023
@cjba7 cjba7 deleted the cjba7-add-fax-to-acceptable-protocols branch January 11, 2023 08:45
@cjba7 cjba7 changed the title Added "fax" to acceptable protocols based on rfc2806. Added "fax" and "modem" to acceptable protocols based on rfc2806. Jan 16, 2023
@flavorjones
Copy link
Owner

This has been released in Release 2.20.0 / 2023-04-01 · flavorjones/loofah.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants