Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add params and literals methods to InsertBuilder, UpdateBuilder and DeleteBuilder #683

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 11, 2021

Conversation

lunch2000
Copy link
Contributor

#679

Please consider merging them if this request is not against doma's policy.

Add params and literals methods to InsertBuilder, UpdateBuilder and
DeleteBuilder
Copy link
Member

@nakamura-to nakamura-to left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your PR.
I think it it almost good.

But could you format your code?
To format code, just run ./gradlew build.


@Test
public void testParams() throws Exception {
UpdateBuilder builder = UpdateBuilder.newInstance(new MockConfig());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think DeleteBuilder is correct in this test class.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I apologize.
I just fixed now.

koichi.ko added 3 commits April 11, 2021 21:35
Correcting mistakes(UpdateBuilder -> DeleteBuilder)
format code
fix the unnecessary changes by code completion
@nakamura-to nakamura-to merged commit 1365cfc into domaframework:master Apr 11, 2021
@lunch2000
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for your review!

@lunch2000 lunch2000 deleted the builder-params-literals branch April 12, 2021 00:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants