Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add base E2E Tests for SDK v0.47 & IBC v7 #2622

Closed
sainoe opened this issue Jun 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Add base E2E Tests for SDK v0.47 & IBC v7 #2622

sainoe opened this issue Jun 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@sainoe
Labels
scope: testing Code review, testing, making sure the code is following the specification.

Comments

@sainoe
Copy link
Contributor

sainoe commented Jun 22, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Problem

As part of #2536, the "base" E2E tests needs to be refactored.

Background
In order to accommodate the upgrade to SDK v0.47 and IBC v7, a #2541 to upgrade Gaia so that only unit and liveness tests would pass. The Global Fee and ICS module are disabled and all E2E tests are currently commented out, in order to be reintroduced and/or refactored and to be consistent with the new libraries and corresponding API's.

Closing criteria

The base E2E tests refactored and passing.

Problem details
@sainoe sainoe added the scope: testing Code review, testing, making sure the code is following the specification. label Jun 22, 2023
@sainoe sainoe self-assigned this Jun 22, 2023
This was referenced Jun 22, 2023
Merged
Closed
Closed
@sainoe sainoe closed this as completed Jul 12, 2023
@sainoe sainoe reopened this Jul 12, 2023
@sainoe
Copy link
Contributor Author

sainoe commented Jul 12, 2023

Solved by #2587

@sainoe sainoe closed this as completed Jul 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@sainoe sainoe

Labels
scope: testing Code review, testing, making sure the code is following the specification.
Projects
Cosmos Hub
Status: ✅ Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@sainoe