Should this repo be archived?

[dblodgett-usgs]

If this notification makes it to anyone that objects -- please object. Otherwise, I will archive next time I decide to clean up github stuff.

[MTG-Formats]

Are the CF-2 issuse now discussed under cf-convention/cf-conventions? Some of the issues here are still open and still relevant to the CF convention evolution - like the use of the new user types. Should these be moved or re-opened as cf-conventions issues?

[dblodgett-usgs]

I think that would make sense. The one I'm responsible for is done. Maybe we just comment on each one @thepersonwhostartedit and tell them to move it to cf-conventions if it's still relevant?

[MTG-Formats]

How can the issue be moved to cf-conventions? Is there an option to do this or shall I just open it again under cf-conventions with a link back here for the previous discussion?

[ghost]

How can the issue be moved to cf-conventions? Is there an option to do this

Seems like it is possible: https://help.github.com/en/articles/transferring-an-issue-to-another-repository.

or shall I just open it again under cf-conventions with a link back here for the previous discussion?

That's how I'd do it because it is guaranteed to work regardless of the user's permissions in the source and target repositories.

[dblodgett-usgs]

I see the "Transfer Issue" button. How about I transfer the ones that seem to still be relevant and comment at the person who started the ones that aren't obvious?

[MTG-Formats]

Sounds like a good idea.