Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Support for ready-to-use GPT3.5 #116

Closed
chaojian-zhang opened this issue Mar 2, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #117
Closed

[Feature Request] Support for ready-to-use GPT3.5 #116

chaojian-zhang opened this issue Mar 2, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #117

Comments

@chaojian-zhang
Copy link

chaojian-zhang commented Mar 2, 2023

Irrelevant Remarks

Great library by the way, and as someone who does not like to deal with REST APIs, having it exposed as native methods makes my code cleaner.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

According to official API doc and Engadget news, ChatGPT's model is officially available as of today (2023.03.01). It would be nice if this library can support the corresponding names for the completion API.

Describe the solution you'd like

I think there should be minimal API change - essentially adding an enumeration. This feature request only concerns the completion API.

Describe alternatives you've considered

I tried to make a fork but the ModelNameBuilder programming model is a bit confusing to me so I will leave this feature implementation to the original author😂

Additional context

image

@Frogley
Copy link

Frogley commented Mar 2, 2023

It's on the way

@kayhantolga kayhantolga linked a pull request Mar 2, 2023 that will close this issue
@kayhantolga
Copy link
Member

Sorry about ModelNameBuilder, it's a bit messy but It is really hard to follow OpenAI naming rules :D however, check version 6.7.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants