Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(planner_manager): limit iteration number by parameter #645

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2023

Conversation

satoshi-ota
Copy link
Contributor

@satoshi-ota satoshi-ota commented Oct 19, 2023

Description

This pull request adds a new parameter max_itration_num to the behavior path planner node and its components. The parameter controls the maximum number of iterations for the planner manager to run the behavior modules and select the best output. This improves the performance and stability of the path planning process.

Tests performed

Evaluator

Effects on system behavior

Nothing.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

Signed-off-by: satoshi-ota <satoshi.ota928@gmail.com>
@satoshi-ota satoshi-ota merged commit 681f5f7 into main Oct 19, 2023
10 of 11 checks passed
@satoshi-ota satoshi-ota deleted the feat/limit-iteration branch October 19, 2023 07:17
soblin pushed a commit to soblin/autoware_launch that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2023
…ion#645)

Signed-off-by: tomoya.kimura <tomoya.kimura@tier4.jp>
maxime-clem pushed a commit to maxime-clem/autoware_launch that referenced this pull request May 21, 2024
yuki-takagi-66 pushed a commit to tier4/autoware_launch that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants