Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(autoware_ad_api_specs): define operation mode interface #1570

Conversation

isamu-takagi
Copy link
Contributor

@isamu-takagi isamu-takagi commented Aug 10, 2022

Signed-off-by: Takagi, Isamu isamu.takagi@tier4.jp

Description

The interface definition for #1535, #1569.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

Signed-off-by: Takagi, Isamu <isamu.takagi@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: Takagi, Isamu <isamu.takagi@tier4.jp>
@isamu-takagi isamu-takagi force-pushed the feature/ad-api/operation-mode-interface branch from 70ea68d to 3772e2c Compare August 10, 2022 14:57
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 10, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 10.48% // Head: 10.34% // Decreases project coverage by -0.14% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (012fe63) compared to base (b5d4e05).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1570      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   10.48%   10.34%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files        1162     1162              
  Lines       82807    82752      -55     
  Branches    19546    19275     -271     
==========================================
- Hits         8686     8559     -127     
- Misses      64617    64933     +316     
+ Partials     9504     9260     -244     
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
differential 9.15% <ø> (?)
total 10.32% <ø> (-0.15%) ⬇️ Carriedforward from a5d329e

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...erception_utils/test/src/test_perception_utils.cpp 53.75% <0.00%> (-3.81%) ⬇️
common/motion_utils/src/resample/resample.cpp 30.97% <0.00%> (-1.70%) ⬇️
perception/tensorrt_yolo/src/nodelet.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
perception/lidar_centerpoint/src/node.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
perception/tensorrt_yolo/lib/src/trt_yolo.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...erception/tensorrt_yolo/lib/include/calibrator.hpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...erception/tensorrt_yolo/lib/include/cuda_utils.hpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../rtc_manager_rviz_plugin/src/rtc_manager_panel.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...tion/traffic_light_classifier/utils/trt_common.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...on/lidar_apollo_instance_segmentation/src/node.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 50 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

isamu-takagi and others added 2 commits August 11, 2022 16:57
…ate.msg

Co-authored-by: Kenji Miyake <31987104+kenji-miyake@users.noreply.github.com>
…ate.msg

Co-authored-by: Kenji Miyake <31987104+kenji-miyake@users.noreply.github.com>
@isamu-takagi isamu-takagi changed the title feat(autoware_ad_api_msgs): define operation mode interface feat(autoware_ad_api_specs): define operation mode interface Aug 24, 2022
@isamu-takagi isamu-takagi merged commit a07358a into autowarefoundation:main Oct 6, 2022
@isamu-takagi isamu-takagi deleted the feature/ad-api/operation-mode-interface branch October 6, 2022 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants