-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
semantic_version version requirement too strong #360
Comments
After a quick test run, it looks like 2.3.1 should be sufficient. I'll have to put together a new release, though. Just curious but what is the restriction in Debian that prevents you from downloading newer versions of the package? |
Probably nothing; the maintainer just didn't update. I can ask him, but when it works with 2.3.1, I can immediately upload the new asdf version. |
Okay. I'm not sure how urgent this is so I'm not sure whether I should issue a 1.3.1 bugfix release today since I just released 1.3.0. |
It is not urgent at all -- I already have a patch which I can apply in the meantime. It was just nice to have your confirmation. |
Thanks for the heads up. This was the first version of |
The version of the "semantic_version" package is given as 2.6.0, which seems to be unnecessarily strong: There seems to be nothing in the
ChangeLog
of semantic_version.For the Debian build, we cannot just download newer versions of a package, and the semantic_version version in Debian is still 2.3.1. Building asdf with that version works however fine.
Could you consider reducing the version requirement for semantic_version?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: